|
Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 734-739
|
Methodologists and context experts disagreed regarding managing conflicts of interest of clinical practice guidelines panels
|
Author keywords
Conflicts of interest; Content expert; Interview; Methodologist; Practice guidelines; Quality
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE;
AUTHORITY;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
EDITOR;
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE;
FINANCE;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HUMAN;
INTELLECT;
METHODOLOGY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;
SOCIETY;
WRITING;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
|
EID: 84861592518
PISSN: 08954356
EISSN: 18785921
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.013 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (16)
|
References (10)
|