Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 178-183

  Mclemore, Elisabeth C ^a   Cullen, John ^a   Horgan, Santiago ^a   Talamini, Mark A ^a   Ramamoorthy, Sonia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis; Inflammatory bowel disease; J pouch; Proctectomy; Robotic surgery; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; URANIUM COMPOUNDS;

FECAL INCONTINENCE; ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSE; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; J-POUCH; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; NOVEL APPLICATIONS; PROCTECTOMY; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS SURGERY; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ERGONOMICS;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

ADULT; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ANUS SURGERY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CASE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIARRHEA; DISEASE SEVERITY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEAL J POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ILEOSTOMY; ILEUS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NOCTURNAL ENURESIS; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; RECTUM RESECTION; ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROCTECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL ABDOMINAL COLECTOMY; TOTAL COLON RESECTION; TOXIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

EID: 84861580566     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.445     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Wu XJ, He XS, Zhou XY, et al. The role of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(8): 949-957.
2. Telem DA, Vine AJ, Swain G, et al. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis: the time has come. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(7): 1616-1620.
3. Indar AA, Efron JE, Young-Fadok TM. Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(1): 174-177.
4. Koopmann MC, Heise CP. Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88(5): 1047-1072.
5. Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, et al. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(2): 438-443.
6. Roukos DH. The era of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(1): 338-339.
7. Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51(11): 1627-1632.
8. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16(5): 1274-1278.
9. Prasad LM, de Souza AL, Marecik SJ, et al. Robotic purse-string technique in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53(2): 230-234.
10. Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, et al. Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251(5): 882-886.
11. Pedraza R, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis Minim Invasive. Ther Allied Technol 2011; 20(4): 234-239.
12. Baik SH. Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49(6): 891-896.
13. Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorect Dis 2010; 12(11): 1084-1093.
14. Charron P, Campbell R, Dejesus S, et al. The gap in laparoscopic colorectal experience between colon and rectal and general surgery residency training programs. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(12): 2023-2031; discussion, 2031.
15. Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(4): 839-846.
16. Li JC, Hon SS, Ng SS, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in a university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(7): 1603-1608.
17. Young-Fadok TM, Hall Long K, McConnell EJ, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 2001; 15(5): 450-454.
18. Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Piotrowicz K, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(10): 1845-1850.
19. Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, et al. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210(3): 306-313.
20. Sari V, Nieboer TE, Vierhout ME, et al. The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 2010; 19(2): 105-109.
21. Nezhat F. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111(2): S29-S32.
22. Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Böhm B, et al. Laparoscopically assisted ileocolectomy in Crohn's disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3(2): 77-80.
23. Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 1993; 80(12): 1602-1605.
24. Ng KH, Lim YK, Ho KS, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Singapore Med J 2009; 50(8): 763-767.