Comparative performance of different grafting techniques in grape cv. Pusa Urvashi

Indian Journal of Horticulture

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 13-19

  Verma, S K ^a   Singh, S K ^a   Krishna, Hare ^a,b   Patel, V B ^a  

^a INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b ICAR Central Institute for Arid Horticulture   (India)

Author keywords

Grafting technique; Grape; Rootstocks; Season

Indexed keywords

PUSA; VITACEAE;

EID: 84861568347     PISSN: 09728538     EISSN: 09740112     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anon. 2001. Annual Report, National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, 16 p.
2. Anon. 2004. Annual Report, National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, 13 p.
3. Blanco, A. 1989. First results on growth and cropping of pear trees budded at different heights. Acta Hort. 256: 93-96.
4. Chandel, J.S. 1989. Effects of different rootstocks and moisture levels on growth, water relations and nutrient uptake of container grown apple plants. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan.
5. Click, H. 1998. The effect of grafting time and types on the success of grafted grapevine production by grafting under nursery conditions. Turkish J. Agric. Forest. 22: 281-90.
6. Click, H. 2000. The effects of different grafting methods applied by manual grafting units on grafting success in grapevines. Turkish J. Agric. Forest. 24: 499-504.
7. Corino, L., Sansone, L. and Sandri, P. 2002. Growth of trunk and evaluation of vegetative and productive behaviour of Pinot Noir clonal selections grafted onto 41 B and SO4. Observations in hilly environment of Langa and Monferrato (Piedmont). Rivista di viticoltura e di Enologia, 55: 3-24.
8. Fouad, M.M., Mohamed, S.M., Khalilli, M.A. and Hussein, A.M. 1995. Effects of rootstocks MM 111, MM 106 and M 9 on tree growth of apple. Acta Hort. 409: 223-25.
9. Gangwar, D., Arora, R.L. and Gaur, G.S. 2005. Compatability behaviour of plum rootstocks with peach scions. Acta Hort. 696: 177-80. (Pubitemid 43413582)
10. Harish Kumar, Vij, V.K., Mehrotra, N.K. and Aulakh, P.S. 2001. Pre-bearing performance of Lahore Local and Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) on different rootstocks under arid-irrigated conditions of Punjab. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 38: 178-80.
11. Hartmann, H.T., Kester, D.E., Davis, J.F.T. and Robert, L.G. 2002. Techniques of grafting. In: Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices (6th Edn.), Prentice Hall Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 772-80.
12. Khilli, D.B., Boubals, D. and Grenan, S. 1996. Study of grafting incompatibility in grapevine. Bulletin-de-IOIV, 69: 787-88.
13. Kumar, S., Ram, S. and Singh, C.P. 2000. Success of veneer and cleft grafting at different grafting height of seedling rootstock in Dashehari mango. Indian J. Hort. 57: 212-14.
14. Nisar, M., Muhammad, J., Sher, M. and Noor, R. 2002. Performance of different stone fruits (peach, plum, apricot and almond) budded on peach rootstock under the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar. Sharad J. Agric. 18: 379-81.
15. Prakash, G.S. and Reddy, N.N. 1990. Effect of different rootstocks on bud break in grape cv. Anab-e-Shahi. Crop Res. Hisar, 3: 51-55.
16. Reddy, B.M.C. 1987. Investigations on the effect of rootstocks in Anab-e-Shahi grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Ph.D. thesis submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
17. Selenznyova, A.N., Thorp, P.G., White, M., Tustin, S. and Costes, F. 2003. Application of architectural analysis and AMAPMOD methodology to study dwarfing and non-dwarfing rootstock/inter-stock combination. Ann. Bot. 91: 665-72.
18. Sharma, D.D. 1989. Effects of different rootstocks and training systems on growth, cropping, nutrient status and water relation of apple trees. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan.
19. Singh, M. and Chaudhary, A.S. 1984. A note on propagation of grapes by bench grafting. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 13: 127-28.
20. Tamble, T.B. and Ganwade, M.H. 2004. Influence of rootstocks on vine vigour, yield and quality of grapes. Acta Hort. 662: 259-63.