Procedural justice in carbon capture and storage

Energy and Environment

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 345-365

  McLaren, Duncan P ^a,b  

^a McLaren Environmental   (Sweden)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COAL MINES; ENERGY POLICY;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; COAL MINING; DEPLOYMENT PROCESS; ENERGY MARKETS; HUMAN RIGHTS; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; PUBLIC AUTHORITIES; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; RESEARCH PROGRAMMES;

CARBON CAPTURE;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY STRATEGY; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESEARCH PROGRAM;

EID: 84861554214     PISSN: 0958305X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.23.2-3.345     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Rawls, J., A theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1971.
2. Sen, A., The idea of justice, Allen Lane, London, 2009.
3. Wolfe, A.K., Bjornstad, D.J., Russell, M. and Kerchner, N.D., A framework for analyzing dialogues over the acceptability of controversial technologies, Science, Technology and Human Values, 2002, 27(1), 134-159.
4. Flynn, R., Bellaby P. and Ricci, M., Risk Perception of an Emergent Technology, The Case of Hydrogen Energy Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2006, 7(1). Online at http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/ viewArticle/58.
5. Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R., See-Through science, Demos, London, 2004. Online at http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/paddlingupstream.
6. Abels, G., Citizen Involvement in Public Policy-making: Does it Improve Democratic Legitimacy and Accountability?, The Case of pTA, Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 2007, 13(1), 103-116.
7. Lake, R.W., Volunteers, NIMBYs, and environmental justice: Dilemmas of democratic practice, Antipode 1996, 28(2), 160-174.
8. Hansson, A., Colonizing the future: The case of CCS, 2011, Review draft. 9. Bryngelsson, M. and Hansson, A., Energy policy on shaky ground? A study of CCSscenarios, Energy Procedia, 2009, 1, 4673-4680.
9. 2: Where should humanity aim?, Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2008, 2, 217-231.
10. Cass, N.F., Ethics, Equity and Justice in the Life-Cycle of Nuclear Power, InCluESEV Literature Review, 2010. Updated and edited Dec 2011 by Dr Catherine Butler, Cardiff University.
11. 2 storage: Deliverable N° D8.1 Qualitative and quantitative social site characterisations, 2011, http://www.sitecharco2. eu/SciPublicationsData.aspx? IdPublication=295&IdType=557.
12. McLaren, D., Negatonnes: An initial assessment of the potential for negative emission techniques to contribute safely and fairly to meeting carbon budgets in the 21st century, Friends of the Earth, London, 2011, http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/negatonnes.pdf.
13. 2 capture process emissions, Doosan Power Systems for Ayrshire Power Ltd., PP-11-014, 2011.
14. 2 Mitigation via Capture and Chemical Conversion in Seawater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 5(3), 1088-1092.
15. Joss, S and Brownlea, A., Considering the concept of procedural justice for public policyand decision-making in science and technology, Science and Public Policy, 1999, 26(5) 321-330.
16. Solum, L.B., Procedural Justice, bepress Legal Series Working Paper 141, 2004, http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/141.
17. Maiese, M., Procedural Justice, in Beyond Intractability, eds., Burgess, G. and Burgess, H., Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder, 2004. http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/procedural-justice/.
18. Gaffney, J., Due process in the World Trade Organisation: The need for procedural justice in the dispute settlement system, American University International Law Review, 1999, 14, 1173-1221.
19. Kumar, N., The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships, Harvard Business Review, 1996, Nov-Dec.
20. Fearne, A, Duffy, R. and Hornibrook, S., Measuring distributive and procedural justice in buyer/supplier relationships: An empirical study of UK supermarket supply chains, 88th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economics, 2004, Retailing and Producer-Retailer Relationships in Food Chains Paris (France), May 5-6.
21. Leventhal, G., What should be done with equity theory?, New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships, in: Gergen, K.J., Greenberg, M.S. and Willis, R.H., eds., Social Exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27-55, New York: Plenum1980.
22. Århus Compliance Committee, Findings and recommendations of the Compliance Committee with regard to Communication ACCC/C/2008/32 (part i) concerning compliance by the European Union, 2011. http://www.clientearth.org/ reports/aarhusconvention- compliance-committee-c32-findings.pdf.
23. Church, M., Tipping the scales: Complying with the Århus Convention on access to justice. Friends of the Earth Scotland, Edinburgh, 2011. http://www.foescotland. org.uk/sites/files/TippingtheScales-Web%20Version.pdf.
24. Bradbury, J., Ray, I., Peterson, T., Wade, S., Wong-Parodi, G. and Feldpausch, A., The Role of Social Factors in Shaping Public Perceptions of CCS: Results of Multi-State Focus Group Interviews in the US, Energy Procedia, 2009, 1, 4665-4672.
25. Hammond, J. and Shackley, S., Towards a public communication and engagement strategy for carbon dioxide capture and storage projects in Scotland, Scottish Centre for Carbon Capture Working Paper 2010-08, SCCS, Edinburgh, 2010.
26. Malone, E.L., Dooley, J.J. and Bradbury, J.A., Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4, 419-425.
27. 2 capture and storage technologies, well-informed and well-considered opinions versus uninformed pseudo-opinions of the Dutch public, Centre for Energy and Environmental Studies Leiden University, for NWO/SenterNovem Project: "Transition to sustainable use of fossil fuels", 2006.
28. Brunsting, S, Desbarats, J., de Best-Waldhober, M., Duetschke, E., Oltra, C., Upham, P. and Riesch, H., The Public and CCS: The Importance of Communication and Participation in the Context of Local Realities, Energy Procedia 2010, 4, 6241-6247.
29. 2 WP1, Institute for European Environmental Policy, 2010.
30. McLaren, D.P., Justice and low carbon energy transitions, A review and synthesis of work undertaken by InCluESEV, 2012 http://incluesev.kcl.ac.uk/- media/downloads/2012/03/incluesev-Theme2-synthesisfull. pdf.
31. Whitmarsh, L, Upham, P., Poortinga, W., McLachlan, C., Darnton, A., Devine-Wright, P., Demski, C. and Sherry Brennan, F., Public Attitudes, Understanding, and Engagement in relation to Low- Carbon Energy: A selective review of academic and non academic literatures, Report for RCUK Energy Programme, 2011.
32. Forbes, S.M., Almendra, F. and Ziegler, M.S., CCS and Community Engagement. Guidelines for Community Engagement in Carbon Dioxide Capture, Transport, and Storage Projects, World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 2010.
33. Bielicki, J.M. and Stephens, J.C., Public Perception of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology: Workshop Report, Energy Technology Innovation Policy research group of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge MA, 2008.
34. Fricker, M., Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.
35. Mikunda, T. and Feenstra, Y., Effective communication strategies to engage the public and stakeholders around CCS projects: A review of country experiences, 2009, Workshop report. ECN-O-10-039, The Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands.
36. 2 project report (WP2), Judge Business School, Cambridge, 2011, http://www.communicationnearco2.eu/fileadmin/communicationnearco2/user/docs/W2. 1-Report-Final.pdf.
37. Clinch, J.P., Third Party Rights of Appeal: Enhancing Democracy or Hindering Progress?, Planning Theory & Practice, 2006, 7(3) 327-350.
38. Ruggie,J., Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework. http://www.businesshumanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding- principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.
39. Hertz, N., Goodbye Gucci. It's the age of co-op capitalism, The Times, February 25, 2009. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest- contributors/article5798645.ece
40. The New Climate Litigation, Wall Street Journal. Dec 28, 2009. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703478704574612150621257422.html.