Resource coordination in wireless sensor networks by cooperative reinforcement learning

2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, PERCOM Workshops 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 895-900

  Khan, Muhidul Islam ^a   Rinner, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cooperative reinforcement learning; Resource Coordination; Tasks scheduling; Wireless sensor networks

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; OBJECT TRACKING; ONLINE SCHEDULING; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING APPROACH; RESOURCE CONSUMPTION; RESOURCE COORDINATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SCHEMES; SENSING NODES; SIMULATION STUDIES; STATIC SCHEDULING; TASK-BASED; TASK-SCHEDULING; TASKS SCHEDULING; TIME STEP;

ALGORITHMS; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING; SCHEDULING; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

SENSOR NODES;

EID: 84861533345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PerComW.2012.6197639     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. K.Shah and M. Kumar, "Distributed Independent Reinforcement Learning (DIRL) Approach to Resource Management in Wireless Sensor Networks," Proc. IEEE Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (Mass 07), IEEE Press,2007, pp.1-9, doi: 10.1109/MOBHOC.2007.4428658.
2. R. Sutton and A. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Itroduction, MIT Press, ISBN 9-262-19398-1.
3. Y.Shoham, R.Powers, and T.Grenager, "Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning: A critical Survey," Computer Science Dept., Stanford University,California, US, Tech. Rep., 16 May 2003.
4. K. Tuyls and A. Nowe, "Evolutionary Game Theory and Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning," The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.20, no.1, pp. 63-90,2005.
5. G. Chalkiadakis, Multiagent reinforcement learning: Stochastic games with multiple learning players, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada, Tech. Rep., 25 March 2003, URL: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/.gehalk/ DepthReport/DepthReport.ps.
6. M. Bowling, Multiagent learning in the presence of agents with limitations, Ph.D. dissertation, Computer Science Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US, May 2003.
7. L. Panait and S. Luke, Cooperative multi-agent learning: The state of the art, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 387-434, November 2005.
8. P.Levis and D.Culler, Mate: A Tiny virtual Machine for Sensor Networks. In proc of the 10th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming languages and Operating Systems, Oct 2002.
9. Tin Liu, Margaret Martonosi, Impala: A Middleware system for managing autonomic, parallel sensor systems. In ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, 2003.
10. V. Lesser, C. Ortiz and M. tambe, Distributed Sensor Networks: A Multi Agent Perspective, Kluwer Publishers, 2003.
11. A. Lopes and L. Botelho, Improving Multi Agrnt Based Resource Coordination in Peer to Peer Networks, Journal of Networks, vol. 3, no. 2, February 2008.