Effects of the resident assessment instrument in home care settings. results of a cluster randomized controlled trial;Effekte des resident assessment instrument in der ambulanten pflege. ergebnisse einer clusterrandomisierten kontrollierten studie

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 315-322

  Stolle, C ^a   Wolter, A ^a   Roth, G ^a   Rothgang, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Health care quality assurance; Home care services; Hospitalization; Long term care; Outcome assessment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSIA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLUSIA; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84861527253     PISSN: 09486704     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00391-011-0221-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Roth G (2001) Qualitätsmängel der Dienstleistung ambulante Altenpflege. Nationale und internationale Forschungsergebnisse [Quality deficits in geriatric home care. National and international results], Stuttgart
2. Roth G (2002) Qualität in Pflegeheimen. Expertise im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend [Quality in nursing homes. Expertise on behalf of the Federal Ministery of Family, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth], Dortmund
3. Garms-Homolová V, Roth G (2004) Vorkommen, Ursachen und Vermeidung von Pflegemängeln. Forschungsbericht im Auftrag der Enquetekommission "Situation und Zukunft der Pflege in Nordrhein- Westfalen" des Landtag von Nordrhein Westfalen. Forschungsbericht [Appearance, reason and avoidance of deficits in care. Research report on behalf of the committee of enquiry "Situation and future of care in North Rhine-Westphalia" of the state parliament of North Rhine-Westphalia], Berlin, Göttingen
4. Donabedian A (1966) Evaluation the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44:166-203
5. Kane RL (1998) Assuring quality in nursing home care. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:232-237
6. Görres S, Reif K, Biedermann H et al (2008) Optimierung des Pflegeprozesses durch neue Steuerungsinstrumente. Der Pflegeforschungsverbund Nord [Optimizing the nursing process by new management instruments. The Northern Germany Nursing Research Network]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 39:159-164
7. Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE et al (1990) Designing the national Resident Assessment Instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist 30:293-307
8. Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD et al (1997) Development of the nursing home Resident Assessment Instrument in the USA. Age Ageing 26:19-25
9. Hawes C, Mor V, Phillips CD et al (1997) The OBRA-87 nursing home regulations and implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: effect on process quality. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:977-985
10. Hirdes J, Fries BE, Morris JN et al (2004) Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) based on the MDS-HC. Gerontologist 44:665-679
11. Achterberg WP, Campen C van, Margriet A et al (1999) Effects of the Resident Assessment Instrument on the care process and health outcomes in nursing homes. A review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med 31:131-137
12. Morris JN, Fries BE, Steel K et al (1997) Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:1017-1024
13. Morris SA, Carpenter GI, Berg K, Jones R (2000) Outcome measures for use with home care clients. Can J Aging 19:87-105
14. Landi F, Onder G, Russo A et al (2001) A new model of integrated home care for the elderly: impact on hospital use. J Clin Epidemiol 54:968-970
15. Landi F, Onder G, Tua E et al (2001) Impact of a new assessment system, the MDS-HC, on function and hospitalization of homebound older people: a controlled clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1288-1293
16. Landi F, Cesari M, Onder G et al (2004) Physical activity and mortality in frail, community-living eldery patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59A:833-837
17. June KJ, Lee JY, Yoon JL (2009) Effects of case mangement using Resident Assessment Instrument - Home Care in home health services for older people. J Korean Acad Nurs 39:366-375
18. Phillips CD, Morris JN, Hawes C et al (1997) Association of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) with changes in function, cognition, and psychosocial status. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:986-993
19. Holtkamp CCM, Kerkstra A, Ooms ME et al (2001) Effects of the implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument on gaps between perceived needs and nursing care supply for nursing home residents in the Netherlands. Int J Nurs Stud 38:619-628
20. Chi I, Law B, Leung AC et al (2010) Residential Assessment Instrument 2.0 in care planning for residents in nursing homes. Hong Kong Med J 16:29-33
21. Mor V, Intrator O, Fries BE et al (1997) Changes in hospitalization associated with introducing the Resident Assessment Instrument. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:1002-1010
22. Dellefield ME (2006) Interdisciplinary care planning and the written care plan in nursing homes: a critical review. Gerontologist 46:128-133
23. Feuerstein I, Kendlbacher E, Fritz E (2008) Evaluierung der Praktikabilität des RAI-HC 2.0 in der Steiermark [Evaluation of the feasibility of RAI-HC 2.0 in Styria]. Pro Care:11-16
24. Kuß O, Jahn P, Renz P, Landenberger M (2009) Cluster-randomisierte Studien in der Pflegewissenschaft [Cluster randomized trials in nursing research]. Hallesche Beiträge zu den Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaften 8:1-12
25. Cosby RH, Howard M, Kaczorowski J et al (2002) Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis. Fam Pract 20:77-82
26. Hastert B (2008) Cluster-randomisierte Studien. Methodische Besonderheiten [Cluster randomized trials. methodically characteristics]. Universität Bremen, Bremen
27. Nübling M (2005) Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen: Erprobung eines Messinstrumentes (COPSOQ) [Measuring psychological stress and strain at work: evaluation of the COPSOQ Questionnaire in Germany]. Wirtschaftsverl. NW Verl. Für Neue Wiss, Bremerhaven
28. Morris JN, Fries BE, Morris SA (1999) Scaling ADLs within the MDS. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54A:M546-M553
29. Carpenter GI, Hastie Cl, Morris JN et al (2006) Measuring change in Activities of Daily Living in nursing home residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 6:7
30. Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189-198
31. Rabin R, Charro F de (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337-343
32. Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJ et al (2005) Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ 6:124-130
33. Noll H (2000) Konzepte der Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Lebensqualität und "neue" Wohlfahrtskonzepte [Concepts of the development of social services: quality of life and "new" concepts of social services]. WZB-Discussions papers P00-505. Querschnittsgruppe Arbeit und Ökologie, Berlin
34. Chi-tat Leung A, Pun Liu C, Lee Tsui L et al (2001) The use of the Minimum Data Set. Home care in a case management project in Hong Kong. Care Manag J 3:8-13
35. Dellefield ME (2007) Implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument/Minimum Data Set in the nursing home as organization: implications for quality improvement in RN clinical assessment. Geriatr Nurs 28:377-386