Using semantics to facilitate data integration of offshore wind farms

Proceedings of the Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference - MELECON

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 430-433

  Nguyen, Trinh Hoang ^a   Prinz, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA INTEGRATION; INFORMATION AVAILABILITY; KNOWLEDGE-SHARING; OFF-SHORE WIND ENERGY; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; OFFSHORE WINDS; OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE; SEMANTIC MODEL; WEATHER CONDITIONS; WIND FARM;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; OFFSHORE POWER PLANTS; WIND POWER;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84861522838     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/MELCON.2012.6196465     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. EWEA. (2011, March) Eu energy policy to 2050.
2. T. Berners-Lee, Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor. Harper San Francisco, 1999.
3. R. Studer, V. Benjamins, and D. Fensel, "Knowledge engineering: principles and methods," Data & knowledge engineering, vol. 25, no. 1-2, pp. 161-197, 1998.
4. T. Nguyen, A. Prinz, T. Friisø, and R. Nossum, "A semantic model for data integration of offshore wind farms," in Norst Informasjonssikkerhetkonferanse (NISK), 2011.
5. IEC 61850 Communication networks and systems in substations - Part 7: Basic communication structure for substation and feeder equipment, IEC Std., Rev. 1st Ed., 7 2003.
6. IEC 61400 Wind turbines - Part 25: Communications for monitoring and control of wind power plants, IEC Std., Rev. 1st Ed., 12 2006.
7. M. Uslar, "The common information model for utilities: An introduction and outlook on future applications," in Proceedings of the XML-Days, 2006, pp. 135-148.
8. M. Uslar, F. Grüning, and S. Rohjans, "A use case for ontology evolution and interoperability: The iec utility standards reference framework 62357," Cases on Semantic Interoperability for Information Systems Integration: Practices and Applications, pp. 39-46.
9. G. Antoniou and F. Harmelen, Web ontology language: OWL. Handbook on Ontologies. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
10. A. Gomez-Perez, M. Fern'andez-L'opez, and O. Corcho, Ontological engineering. Springer, 2004, vol. 82.
11. M. Uschold and M. Gruninger, "Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications," Knowledge engineering review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 93-136, 1996.
12. S. Khan and M. Qadir, "A genaric framework for evaluation of ontology to relational database transformation process," in Information and Emerging Technologies (ICIET), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 1-5.
13. Z. Hameed, J. Vatn, and J. Heggset, "Challenges in the reliability and maintainability data collection for offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 2154-2165, 2011.
14. I. Astrova, N. Korda, and A. Kalja, "Storing owl ontologies in sql relational databases," International Journal of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, 2007.
15. A. Gali, C. Chen, K. Claypool, and R. Uceda-Sosa, "From ontology to relational databases," Conceptual Modeling for Advanced Application Domains, pp. 278-289, 2004.