Determinants of willingness-to-pay for water pollution abatement: A point and interval data payment card application

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 108, Issue , 2012, Pages 49-53

  Mahieu, Pierre Alexandre ^a   Riera, Pere ^b   Giergiczny, Marek ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Fish conservation; Interval data model; Payment card; Point and interval data model; Valuation function

Indexed keywords

RESOURCE VALUATION; WATER POLLUTION;

CENSORED DATA; CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; FISH CONSERVATION; INTERVAL DATA; INTERVAL DATA MODEL; PAYMENT CARD; POINT AND INTERVAL DATA MODEL; POINT DATA; VALUATION FUNCTION;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; DATA INTERPRETATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FISH; MODEL VALIDATION; NATURE CONSERVATION; POLLUTION CONTROL; SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY; WATER POLLUTION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ARTICLE; CONTINGENT VALUATION; LAKE; STATISTICAL MODEL; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 84861474043     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.036     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barton D.N., Navrud S., Bjorkeslett H., Lilleby I. Economic benefits of large-scale remediation of contaminated marine sediments-a literature review and an application to the Grenland fjords in Norway. J. Soils Sediments 2010, 10:186-201.
2. Bateman I., Cooper P., Georgiou S., Navrud S., Poe G., Ready R., Riera P., Ryan M., Vossler C. Economic valuation of policies for managing acidity in remote mountain lakes: examining validity through scope sensitivity testing. Aquat. Sci. 2005, 67:274-291.
3. Calia P., Strazzera E. A sample selection model for protest responses in contingent valuation analyses. Statistica 2001, 61:473-485.
4. Cameron T.A., Huppert D.D. OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1989, 17:230-246.
5. Cameron A.C., Trivedi P.K. Microeconometrics Using Stata 2010, Stata Press, College Station.
6. Carson R.T., Mitchell R.C., Hanemann M., Kopp R.J., Presser S., Ruud P.A. Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2003, 25:257-286.
7. Cooper J.C. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1993, 24:1-100.
8. Daniels, R.C., Rospabe, S., 2005. Estimating an earnings function from coarsened data by an interval censored regression procedure. Working Paper, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch.
9. Gibson, J., 2004. Firm size, wages, and unmeasured skills: Evidence from an international database. Working Paper, Williams College, Williamstown.
10. Haab T.C., McConnell K.E. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
11. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1984, 66:332-341.
12. Huhtala A., Pouta E. User fees, equity and the benefits of public outdoor recreation services. J. Forest Econ. 2008, 14:117-132.
13. Lienhoop N., MacMillan D. Valuing wilderness in Iceland: estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:289-295.
14. Lindhjem H., Navrud S. Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1628-1637.
15. Moore C.C., Holmes T.P., Kathleen P.B. An attribute-based approach to contingent valuation of forest protection programs. J. Forest Econ. 2011, 17:35-52.
16. Morey, E.R., Rossmann, K., Chestnut, L., Ragland, S., 1997. National acid precipitation assessment program. Working Paper, University of Colorado, Boulder.
17. O'Shea E., Gannon B., Kennelly B. Eliciting preferences for resource allocation in mental health care in Ireland. Health Policy 2008, 88:359-370.
18. O'Shea E., Stewart J.M., Donaldson C., Shackley P. Eliciting preferences for resource allocation in health care. Econ. Soc. Rev. 2001, 32:217-238.
19. Rosenberger R.S., Walsh R.G. Nonmarket value of western valley ranchland using contingent valuation. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 1997, 22:296-309.
20. Rowe R.D., Schulze W.D., Breffle W.S. A test for payment card biases. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1996, 31:178-185.
21. Serneels P., Montalvo J.M., Pettersson G., Lievens T., Butera J.D., Kidanu A. Who wants to work in a rural health post? The role of intrinsic motivation, rural background and faith-based institutions in Ethiopia and Rwanda. B. World Health Organ 2010, 88:342-349.
22. Solomon B.D., Johnson N.H. Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2137-2144.
23. Stewart J.M., O'Shea E., Donaldson C., Shackley P. Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care?. J. Health Econ. 2002, 21:585-599.