The effect of adhesive strength of hydroxyapatite coating on the stability of hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses in vivo at the early stage of implantation

Archives of Medical Science

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 199-208

  Duan, Yonghong ^a,b   Zhu, Shu ^c   Guo, Fei ^d   Zhu, Jinyu ^a   Li, Mao ^a   Ma, Jie ^e   Zhu, Qingsheng ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b 451 Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army   (China)

^c FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NONE   (China)

^e FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adhesive strength; Artificial joints; Biomechanical; Hydroxyapatite coating; Stability

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR CONDYLE; HYDROXYAPATITE COATED PROSTHESIS; IMPLANTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 84861471792     PISSN: 17341922     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2012.28545     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Goller G, Oktar FN, Ozyegin LS, Kayali ES, Demirkesen E. Plasma-sprayed human bone-derived hydroxyapatite coatings: effective and reliable. Mater Lett 2004; 582: 599-604.
2. Kusakabe H, Sakamaki T, Nihei K, et al. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem. Biomaterials 2004; 2529: 57-69.
3. NCapello W, D'Antonio JA, Geesink RG, Feinberg JR, Naughton M. Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 4671: 55-65.
4. Dorairajan A, Reddy RM, Krikler S. Outcome of acetabular revision using an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated component. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 209-18. (Pubitemid 40342708)
5. Chambers B, Clair SFS, Froimson MI. Hydroxyapatite-coated tapered cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (4 Suppl 1): 71-4. (Pubitemid 47001307)
6. Cao N, Dong J, Wang Q, Ma Q, Xue C, Li M. An experimental bone defect healing with hydroxyapatite coating plasma sprayed on carbon/carbon composite implants. Surf Coat Technol 2010; doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.05.0081-7.
7. Søballe K, Overgaard S. The current status of hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1996; 78-B: 689-91.
8. Morscher EW, Hefti A, Aebi U. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coating. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-B: 267-72.
9. Gross KA, Walsh W, Swarts E. Analysis of retrieved hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses. J Therm Spray Technol 2004; 13: 190-9.
10. Murty AN, Scott G, Freeman MAR. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 844-51. (Pubitemid 37259685)
11. Wang F, Chen DY, Qiu XS, et al. Clinical analysis and prevention from coating shedding of uncemented hip prosthesis. China J Orthop Trauma 2009; 22: 413-6.
12. Nimb L, Gotfredsen K, Jensen JS. Mechanical failure of hydroxyapatite coated titanium and cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy implants: An animal study. Acta Orthop Belg 1993; 59: 333-8.
13. Faig-Martía J, Gil-Murb FJ. Hydroxyapatite coatings in prosthetic joints. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2008; 52: 113-20.
14. Morscher EW. Hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73: 705-6.
15. Røkkum M, Reigstad A, Johansson CB. HA particles can be released from well-fixed HA-coated stems. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 298-306.
16. Xie Y, Hawthorne HM. A model for compressive coating stresses in the scratch adhesion test. Surf Coat Technol 2001; 14: 115-25.
17. Bull SJ, Berasetegui EG. An overview of the potential of quantitative coating adhesion measurement by scratch testing. Tribol Int 2006; 39: 99-114. (Pubitemid 41635815)
18. Valli J, Mäkelä U. Applications of the scratch test method for coating adhesion assessment. Wear 1987; 115: 215-22.
19. Chang Y, Kobayashi M, Li Z, Oka M, Nakamura T. Significance of peak value and duration of the interfacial shear loadin evaluation of the bone-implant interface. Clin Biomech 2003; 187: 73-9.
20. Castellani C, Lindtner RA, Hausbrandt P, et al. Bone-implant interface strength and osseointegration: Biodegra dable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 432-40.