Nasal bone shape is under complex epistatic genetic control in mouse interspecific recombinant congenic strains

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Burgio, Gaétan ^a,b,c   Baylac, Michel ^d   Heyer, Evelyne ^b   Montagutelli, Xavier ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Université Paris Diderot   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^d MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME ISOLATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSING OVER; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC REGULATION; INTERSPECIFIC RECOMBINANT CONGENIC STRAIN; MALE; MOUSE; NASAL BONE; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; RECOMBINANT CONGENIC STRAIN; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; STRAIN IDENTIFICATION;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; MALE; MICE; MICE, CONGENIC; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NASAL BONE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

MUS; MUS SPRETUS;

EID: 84861471706     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037721     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Langlade NB, Feng X, Dransfield T, Copsey L, Hanna AI, et al. (2005) Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 10221-10226.
2. Albertson RC, Streelman JT, Kocher TD, Yelick PC, (2005) Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 16287-16292.
3. Sherwood RJ, Duren DL, Havill LM, Rogers J, Cox LA, et al. (2008) A Genomewide Linkage Scan for Quantitative Trait Loci Influencing the Craniofacial Complex in Baboons (Papio hamadryas spp.). Genetics 180: 619-628.
4. Leamy LJ, Routman EJ, Cheverud JM, (1999) Quantitative trait loci for early- and late-developing skull characters in mice: A test of the genetic independence model of morphological integration. American Naturalist 153: 201-214.
5. Dohmoto A, Shimizu K, Asada Y, Maeda T, (2002) Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 10 and 11 influencing mandible size of SMXA RI mouse strains. J Dent Res 81: 501-504.
6. Cheverud JM, Routman EJ, Irschick DJ, (1997) Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51: 2006-2016.
7. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ, Routman EJ, Cheverud JM, (2001) Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157: 785-802.
8. Klingenberg CP, Leamy LJ, Cheverud JM, (2004) Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166: 1909-1921.
9. Demant P, Hart AAM, (1986) Recombinant Congenic Strains- a New Tool for Analyzing Genetic-Traits Determined by More Than One Gene. Immunogenetics 24: 416-422.
10. Moen CJ, van der Valk MA, Snoek M, van Zutphen BF, von Deimling O, et al. (1991) The recombinant congenic strains-a novel genetic tool applied to the study of colon tumor development in the mouse. Mamm Genome 1: 217-227.
11. Rogner UC, Boitard C, Morin J, Melanitou E, Avner P, (2001) Three loci on mouse chromosome 6 influence onset and final incidence of type 1 diabetes in NOD.C3H congenic strains. Genomics 74: 163-171.
12. Morel L, Mohan C, Yu Y, Croker BP, Tian N, et al. (1997) Functional dissection of systemic lupus erythematosus using congenic mouse strains. Journal of Immunology 158: 6019-6028.
13. Morel L, Croker BP, Blenman KR, Mohan C, Huang G, et al. (2000) Genetic reconstitution of systemic lupus erythematosus immunopathology with polycongenic murine strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 6670-6675.
14. Burgio G, Szatanik M, Guenet JL, Arnau MR, Panthier JJ, et al. (2007) Interspecific Recombinant Congenic Strains Between C57BL/6 and Mice of the Mus spretus Species: A Powerful Tool to Dissect Genetic Control of Complex Traits. Genetics 177: 2321-2333.
15. Wolf JB, Leamy LJ, Routman EJ, Cheverud JM, (2005) Epistatic pleiotropy and the genetic architecture of covariation within early and late-developing skull trait complexes in mice. Genetics 171: 683-694.
16. Willmore KE, Zelditch ML, Young N, Ah-Seng A, Lozanoff S, et al. (2006) Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse. J Anat 208: 361-372.
17. Kawakami M, Yamamura K, (2008) Cranial bone morphometric study among mouse strains. BMC Evol Biol 8: 73.
18. Burgio G, Baylac M, Heyer E, Montagutelli X, (2009) Genetic analysis of skull shape variation and morphological integration in the mouse using interspecific recombinant congenic strains between C57BL/6 and mice of the mus spretus species. Evolution 63: 2668-2686.
19. L'Hote D, Serres C, Laissue P, Oulmouden A, Rogel-Gaillard C, et al. (2007) Centimorgan-range one-step mapping of fertility traits using interspecific recombinant congenic mice. Genetics 176: 1907-1921.
20. Laissue P, Burgio G, l'Hote D, Renault G, Marchiol-Fournigault C, et al. (2009) Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci responsible for embryonic lethality in mice assessed by ultrasonography. Int J Dev Biol 53: 623-629.
21. Friess M, Baylac M, (2003) Exploring artificial cranial deformation using elliptic Fourier analysis of Procrustes aligned outlines. Am J Phys Anthropol 122: 11-22.
22. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR, (1982) Elliptic Fourier Features of a Closed Contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18: 236-258.
23. Rohlf FJ, Archie JW, (1984) A Comparison of Fourier Methods for the Description of Wing Shape in Mosquitos (Diptera, Culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33: 302-317.
24. Bookstein FL, (1996) Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Lov A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, editors. Advances in Morphometrics pp. 131-151.
25. Dryden IL, Mardia KV, (1998) Statistical shape analysis. NY J. Wiley. xvii, 347 p.
26. Monti L, Baylac M, Lalanne-Cassou B, (2001) Elliptic Fourier analysis of the form of genitalia in two Spodoptera species and their hybrids (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 391-400.
27. Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A, (2002) Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 1909-1920.
28. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA, (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19: 889-890.
29. Lachenbruch PA, Michey MR, (1968) Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis. Technometrics 10: 1-10.
30. Rao CR, Suryawanshi S, (1998) Statistical analysis of shape through triangulation of landmarks: A study of sexual dimorphism in hominids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 4121-4125.
31. Kelsey J, Whittemore A, Evans A, Thompson W, (1996) Methods in Observational Epidemiology. NY Oxford University Press.