Future monitoring and research needs for forest ecosystems in a changing environment: An introduction

IForest

Volumn 2, Issue JANUARY, 2009, Pages 54-55

  Schaub, M ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Atmospheric depositions; Climate change; Critical loads; Ozone

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861460567     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0488-002     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Augustin S (2009). Linking critical thresholds for acidity to forest condition by using element contents in tree rings: consequences for the development of an integrated ecosystem assessment. iForest 2: 51-53.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0487-002
2. Beck W (2009). Growth patterns of forest stands-the response towards pollutants and climatic impact. iForest 2: 4-6.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0472-002
3. Bytnerowicz A, Omasa K, Paoletti E (2007). Integrated effects of air pollution and climate change on forests: A northern hemisphere perspective. Environmental Pollution 147: 438-445.-doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.028
4. Feest A, Spanos K (2009). An approach to measuring biodiversity and its use in analysing the effect of nitrogen deposition on woodland butterfly populations in the Netherlands. iForest 2: 46-48.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0487-002
5. Granke O, Kenter B, Kriebitzsch WU, Köhl M, Köhler R, Olschofsky K (2009). Biodiversity assessment in forests-from genetic diversity to landscape diversity. iForest 2: 1-3.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0474-002
6. IPCC (2007). Summary for policymakers. In: "Climate change 2007: mitigation". Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York (USA).
7. Jochheim H, Puhlmann M, Beese F, Berthold D, Einert P, Kallweit R, Konopatzky A, Meesenburg H, Meiwes K-J, Raspe S, Schulte-Bisping H, Schulz C (2009). Modelling the carbon budget of intensive forest monitoring sites in Germany using the simulation model BIOME-BGC. iForest 2: 7-10.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0475-002
8. Johannessen T (2009). Clean air policy under the UNECE Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution: how are monitoring results "translated" to policy action. iForest 2: 49-50.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0476-002
9. Lamarque J-F, Kiehl JT, Brasseur GP, Butler T, Cameron-Smith P, Collins WD, Collins WJ, Granier C, Hauglustaine D, Hess PG, Holland EA, Horowitz L, Lawrence MG, McKenna D, Merilees P, Prather MJ, Rasch PJ, Rotman D, Shindell D, Thornton P (2005). Assessing future nitrogen deposition and carbon cycle feedback using a multimodel approach: Analysis of nitrogen deposition, J. Geophys. Res. 110: D19303-doi: 10.1029/2005JD005825
10. Logan JA, Macfarlane WW, Willcox L (2009). Effective monitoring as a basis for adaptive management: a case history of mountain pine beetle in Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem whitebark pine. iForest 2: 19-22.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0477-002
11. Lorenz M, Granke O (2009). Deposition measurements and critical loads calculations: monitoring data, results and perspective. iForest 2: 11-14.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0478-002
12. Lundin L (2009). Hydrology, element budgets, acidification, nutrient N in a climate change perspective for the northern forest region. iForest 2: 23-25.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0479-002
13. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Global Assessment Reports. Web Site. [online] URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Global.aspx
14. Novak K, Cherubini P, Saurer M, Fuhrer J, Skelly JM, Kräuchi N, Schaub M (2007). Ozone air pollution effects on tree-ring growth, delta(13)C, visible foliar injury and leaf gas exchange in three ozone-sensitive woody plant species. Tree Physiology 27: 941-949. [online] URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17403646
15. Requardt A, Schuck A, Köhl M (2009). Means of combating forest dieback-EU support for maintaining forest health and vitality. iForest 2: 38-42.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0480-002
16. stcentury: future trends, impacts and policy implications. RS Policy document 15/08. The Royal Society, London, UK.
17. Sase H, Nakayama S, Leong CP, Kamisako M, Luangjame J, Garivait H, Visaratana T, Kietvuttinon B, Ueda H (2009). QA/QC activities and ecological monitoring in the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET). iForest 2: 26-29.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0481-002
18. Schaub M, Paoletti E (2007). Introductory remarks to the special section for the 2005 IUFRO World Congress, Brisbane, Australia. In: “Air pollution and climate change: a global overview of the effects on forest vegetation (Schaub M, Paoletti E eds). Environmental Pollution 147: 429.-doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.040
19. Serafinaviciute B, Stakenas V (2009). Ozone fumigation effects on the morphology and biomass of Norway spruce (Picea abiesL.) saplings. iForest 2: 15-18.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0483-002
20. Staelens J, Neirynck J, Genouw G, Roskams P (2009). Dynamic modelling of target loads of acidifying deposition for forest ecosystems in Flanders (Belgium). iForest 2: 30-33.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0484-002
21. Tuovinen J-P (2009). Ozone flux modelling for risk assessment: status and research needs. iForest 2: 34-37.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0485-002
22. Wuyts K, De Schrijver A, Verheyen K (2009). The importance of forest type when incorporating forest edge deposition in the evaluation of critical load exceedance. iForest 2: 43-45.-doi: 10.3832/ifor0486-002