The EQ-5D health states value set for Slovenia

Zdravstveno Varstvo

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 128-140

  Rupel, Valentina Prevolnik ^a   Ogorevc, Marko ^b  

^a Ministrstvo za Zdravje   (Slovenia)

^b In titut za Ekonomska Raziskovanja   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Health technology assessment; Slovenia; Spatial error model; Value set; VAS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861430252     PISSN: 03510026     EISSN: 18542476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10152-012-0015-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Drummond M. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press 1997.
2. Nord E. Cost-value analysis in health care: making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
3. Parkin D, Devlin N. In defence of the visual analogue scale? In: Prevolnik Rupel V, editor. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion Papers, Bled: Ministry of Health, 2003: 11-22.
4. EuroQol Group. Accesed on 11.01.2010 from. http://www.euroqol.org.
5. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337-343. (Pubitemid 32675374)
6. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal: England, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008.
7. Devlin N, Williams A. Valuing quality of life: results for New Zealand health professionals. N Z Med J 1999; 112: 369-370.
8. Dolan P. et al. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population study. Discussion paper no. 138, The University of York, Centre for Health Economics, 1995.
9. Wittrup-Jensen KU, Lauridsen JT, Gudex C, Brooks R, Pedersen KM. Estimating Danish EQ-5D tariffs using the time trade-off (TTO) and visual analogue scale (VAS) methods. In: Norinder LA, Pedersen KM, Roos P, editors. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion Papers, Copenhagen: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, 2001: 257-292.
10. Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Kind P, Williams AH. The health state preferences and logical inconsistencies of New Zealanders: a tale of two tariffs. In: Cabases MJ, Gaminde I, editors. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion papers, Pamplona: Universidad Publica de Navarra, 2000: 61-86.
11. Lovell MC. A simple proof of the FWL theorem. J Econ Educ 2008; 39: 88-91.
12. Fukuda T. et al. Estimating a EuroQol value set: the case of Japan. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Roset M, editors. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion Papers, Sitges: Institut Universitari de salut publica de Catalunya, 1999: 241-270.
13. Kerim-Sade C, Wasem J. An external control of validity of the German EuroQol-5D questionnaire. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Roset M, editors. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion Papers, Sitges: Institut Universitari de salut publica de Catalunya, 1999: 189-203.
14. Prevolnik Rupel V, Ogorevc M. The reliability and stability of Slovenian population preferences for EQ-5D health states in time. Zdrav Vestn 2009; 78: 633-640.
15. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 39: 806-820.
16. Krabbe PFM, Stalmeier PFM, Lamers LM, Van Busschbach JJ. An experimental study of three principal biases on the visual analogue scale. In: Pickard S, editor. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion Papers, Chicago: University of Illinois, 2004: 193-204.
17. Bleichrodt H, Johannesson M. An experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations. Med Decis Making 2000; 17: 208-216. (Pubitemid 27157037)
18. Torrance GW, Furlong WJ. Visual analog scale: do they have a role in measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 329-334. (Pubitemid 32652496)
19. King JT, Styn MA, Tsevat J, Roberts MS. «Perfect health» versus «disease free»: the impact of anchor point choice on the measurement of preferences and calculation of disease-specific disutiliies. Med Decis Making 2003; 23: 212-225. (Pubitemid 36618062)
20. Robinson A, Loomes G, Jones-Lee M. Visual analogue scales, standard gambles and relative risk aversion. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 17-27. (Pubitemid 32245027)