Dynamic assessment of information acquisition effort during interactive search

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 48, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Cole, Michael J ^a   Gwizdka, Jacek ^a   Liu, Chang ^a   Belkin, Nicholas J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive effort; Eye tracking; Methodology; Search task difficulty; User study

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861421323     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801149     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Aula, A., Khan, R. and Guan, Z. (2010). How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? Proceedings of CHI'10, 35-44.
2. Bierig, R., Gwizdka, J., and Cole, M. J. (2009). A usercentered experiment and logging framework for interactive information retrieval. In Belkin, N. J., et al. editors, Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on Understanding the User: Logging and interpreting user interactions in information search and retrieval., pages 8-11, Boston, MA. CEUR.
3. Byström, K. (2002). Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53(7), 581-591.
4. Byström, K., and Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31, 191-213.
5. Boland, J. E. (2004). Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading and listening, pages 51-76. Taylor & Francis.
6. Carpenter, R. and McDonald, S. A. (2007). LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading. Experimental Brain Research, 177(2):176-183.
7. Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Bierig, R., Belkin, N. J., Liu, J., Liu, C., Zhang, J., and Zhang, X. (2010). Linking search tasks with low-level eye movement patterns. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Delf, The Netherlands.
8. Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N. J., Bierig, R., and Zhang, X. (2011). Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search. Interacting with Computers. 23(4), 346-362.
9. Drieghe, D., Desmet, T., and Brysbaert, M. (2007). How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading? British Journal of Psychology, 98:157-171.
10. Drieghe, D., Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B., and Rayner, K. (2010). Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary. Cognition, 116(1):136-142.
11. Gwizdka, J., and Spence, I. (2006). What can searching behavior tell us about the difficulty of information tasks? A study of Web navigation. Proceedings of ASIST'06.
12. Gwizdka, J. (2008). Revisiting search task difficulty: Behavioral and individual difference measures. Proceedings of ASIST'08.
13. Gwizdka, J. (2010), Distribution of cognitive load in Web search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61:2167-2187.
14. Hornof, A. J. and Halverson, T. (2002). Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(4):592-604.
15. Inhoff, A. W. and Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(1):20-34.
16. Juhasz, B., White, S., Liversedge, S. P., and Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
17. Kim, J. (2006). Task difficulty as a predictor and indicator of web searching interaction. Proceedings of CHI'06, 959-964.
18. Kim, Y. M. and Rieh, S. Y. (2005). Dual-Task Performance as a Measure for Mental Effort in Library Searching and Web Searching. Proceedings of the 68th ASIS&T.
19. Kim, S. and Soergel, D. (2005), Selecting and measuring task characteristics as independent variables. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42: n/a. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504201111
20. Li, y (2008) Relationships among work tasks, search tasks, and interactive information searching behavior. Ph. D. Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Retrieved from http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.2/ rucore10001600001. ETD.17150
21. Li, Y. and Belkin, N. J. (2008) A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 44(6):1822-1837
22. Liu, J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N. (2010). Predicting task difficulty for different task types. In Proceedings of ASIST 2010. Pittsburgh, PA. October 22-27, 2010.
23. Morris, R. (1994). Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20(1):92.
24. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., and Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(2):123-130.
25. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124:372-422.
26. Rayner, K. and Duffy, S. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3):191-201.
27. Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
28. Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., and Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3):241-255.
29. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. (2004). The EZ Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(04):445-476.
30. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., and Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(1):4-22.
31. Reingold, E. and Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the EZ Reader model. Psychological Science, 17(9):742-746.
32. Sereno, S., O'Donnell, P., and Rayner, K. (2006). Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Investigating the subordinate-bias effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2):335.
33. Toms, E., MacKenzie, T., Jordan, C., O'Brien, H., Freund, L., Toze, S. et al. (2007). How task affects information search. Workshop Pre-proceedings of in Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX), 337-341.
34. Tsai, C. and McConkie, G. (1995). The perceptual span in reading Chinese text: A moving window study. In 7th International Conference on the Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Other Asian Languages, Hong Kong.
35. Tungare, M. & Pérez-Quinones, M. (2009). Mental workload in multi-device personal information management. In Proceedings of CHI'09
36. White, R. W. and Kelly, D. (2006). A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, (CIKM'06).
37. Williams, R. and Morris, R. (2004). Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1):312-339.