Modeling and visualization of symmetric and asymmetric plant competition

Natural Phenomena

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 83-88

  Alsweis, M ^a   Deussen, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION; COMPLEX PLANTS; DISCRETE SIMULATIONS; PLANT COMMUNITIES; PLANT COMPETITION; SYMMETRIC COMPETITION; VISUAL SIMULATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84861406837     PISSN: 18160867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. [Aik04] AIKIO S.: Competitive asymmetry, foraging area size and coexistence of annuals. Oikos 104 (2004), 51- 58.
2. [AP03] AIKIO S., PAKKASMAA: Relatedness and competitive asymmetry - implication for growth and population dynamics. Oikos 100 (2003), 51-58.
3. [BBHG02] BAUER S., BERGER U., HILDENBRANDT H., GRIMM V.: Cyclic dynamics in simulated plant populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 269, 1508 (2002), 2443-2450.
4. [BE01] BENES B., ESPINOSA. E.: Using particles for 3d texture sculpting. The Journal of visualization and Computer Animation 5 (2001), 3-15.
5. [BHG02] BERGER U., HILDENBRANDT H., GRIMM V.: Towards a standard for the individual-based modeling of plant opulations: self-Thinning and the field of neighbourhood approach. Nat. Ressource Model 15 (2002), 3954.
6. [BT96] BEGON M. H. J., TOWNSEND C.: Ecology individuals, populations and communities. Black-well Science (1996).
7. [CDN02] C. DAMGAARD J. W., NAGASHIMA H.: Modelling individual growth and competition in plant populationms: growth curves of chenopodium album at twodensities. Journal of Ecology 90 (2002), 666-671.
8. [Dam99] DAMGAARD C.: A test of asymmetric competition in plant monocultures using the maximum likelihood function of a simple growth model. Ecological Modelling 116 (1999), 285-292.
9. [Dam01] DAMGAARD C.: Quantifying the invasion probability of genetically modified. Online Journal - URL:http://www.bioline.org.br/by. 7 (2001).
10. [DHP-] DEUSSEN O., HANRAHAN P., PHARR M., LINTERMANN B., M̌E CH R., PRUSINKIEWICZ P.: Realistic modeling and rendering of plant ecosystems. In SIGGRAPH 98 Conf. Proc., ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 275-286.
11. [DL97] DEUSSEN O., LINTERMANN B.: A modelling method and user interface for creating plants. In Proc. Graphics Interface 97 (May 1997), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 189-198.
12. [DL04] DEUSSEN O., LINTERMANN B.: Digital design of nature computer generated plants and organics. Springer Verlag, 2004.
13. [Jon02] JONES. H.: Modelling of Growing Natural Forms. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
14. [LGBFP01] L. GARCIA-BARRIOS, D. MAYER-FOULKES, M. F. G. U.-V., FRANCO-PEREZ. J.: Development and validation of a spatial explicit individual-based mixed crop growth model. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 63 (2001), 507-526.
15. [LP02] LANE B., PRUSINKIEWICZ P.: Generating spatial distributions for multilevel models of plant communities. Graphics Interface (2002), 69-80.
16. [MP96] MECH R., P.PRUSINKIEWICZ.: Visual model of plant interacting with their environment. Computer Graphics(Siggraph t'S96 Conference Proceedings) 30, 4 (1996), 397-410.
17. [Ric59] RICHARDS F.: A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Botany 10 (1959), 290-300.
18. [SF95] SCHWINNING S., FOX. G. A.: Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants. Oikos 72 (1995), 422-432.
19. [UH00] U. B., H. H.: A new approach to spatially explicity modelling of forest dynamics, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees. Ecological Modelling 132 (2000), 287-302.
20. [Van89] VANDERMEER J.: The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (1989).
21. [Wei90] WEINER J.: Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol. 5 (1990).
22. [WWJ99] WYSZOMIRSKI T., WYSZOMIRSKA I., JARZYNA. I.: Simple mechanisms of size distributions dynamics in crowded and uncrowded virtual monocultures. Ecolugical Modelling 115: (1999), 253-273.