Using fMRI to study conceptual change: Why and how?;Manyetik rezonans görüntülemeyi (MRG) kullanarak kavramsal gelişimi inceleme: Neden ve nasıl?

International Journal of Environmental and Science Education

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 19-35

  Masson, Steve ^a   Potvin, Patrice ^a   Riopel, Martin ^a   Foisy, Lorie Marlène Brault ^a   Lafortune, Stéphanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brain imaging; Conceptual change; Educational neuroscience; Neuroeducation; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861388319     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13063065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Amaro, E., & Barker, G. J. (2006). Study design in fMRI: Basics principles. Brain and Cognition, 60, 220-232.
2. Ansari, D. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 278-291.
3. Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2005). Unified segmentation. NeuroImage, 26(3), 839-851.
4. Bandettini, P. A., & Cox, R. W. (2000). Event-related fMRI contrast when using constant interstimulus interval: Theory and experiment. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 43(4), 540-548.
5. Beaulieu, C., Plewes, C., Paulson, L. A., Roy, D., Snook, L., Concha, L., et al. (2005). Imaging brain connectivity in children with diverse reading ability. NeuroImage, 25(4), 1266-1271.
6. Berger, H. (1929). Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 87(1), 527-570.
7. Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavior Neuroscience, 7(4), 356-366.
8. Buckner, R. L. (1998). Event-related fMRI and the hemodynamic response. Human Brain Mapping, 6(5-6), 373-377.
9. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis, MN.: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Cohen, D. (1972). Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science, 175(4022), 664-666.
11. Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 16, pp. 3-56). Washington, NW: American Educational Research Association.
12. Dehaene, S. (2007). Les neurones de la lecture. Paris: Odile Jacob.
13. Desmond, J. E., & Glover, G. H. (2002). Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 118(2), 115-128.
14. Di Sessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.
15. Di Sessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 265-281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Di Sessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191.
17. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography on students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Retrieved March 17th, 2011, from http://ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
18. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
19. Dunbar, K. N., Fugelsang, J. A., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with Data: 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 193-206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Fischer, K. W., Daniel, D. B., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Stern, E., Battro, A., & Koizumi, H. (2007). Why Mind, Brain, and Education? Why Now? Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 1-2.
21. Friston, K., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R., & Turner, R. (1996). Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 35(3), 346-355.
22. Fugelsang, J. A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2005). Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1204-1213.
23. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2004). Cognitive neurosciences III. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Geake, J., & Cooper, P. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: Implications for education. Westminster Studies in Education, 26(1), 7-20.
25. Geake, J. G. (2003). Adapting middle level educational practices to current research on brain functioning. Journal of the New England League of Middle Schools, 15(2), 6-12.
26. Geake, J. G. (2004). Cognitive neuroscience and education: Two-way traffic or one-way street? Westminster Studies in Education, 27(1), 87-98.
27. Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87(1), 11-22.
28. Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 1-14.
29. Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Review Neuroscience, 7, 406-413.
30. Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2009). To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 604-608.
31. Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Reishofer, G., Stern, E., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2007). Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation. NeuroImage, 38(2), 346-356.
32. Houdé, O. (2006). Neuropédagogie? Entretien avec Olivier Houde ́ réalisé par Gilles Marchand. Le Monde de l'intelligence, 4, 18-19.
33. Houdé, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Cerveau et psychologie: Introduction à l'imagerie cérébrale anatomique et fonctionnelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
34. Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
35. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., et al. (1992). Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89, 5675-5679.
37. Legendre, M.-F. (2002). Le rôle du raisonnement qualitatif dans les processus de changement conceptuel et ses implications pour l'enseignement. In R. M. J. Toussaint (Ed.), Changement conceptuel et apprentissage des sciences, recherches et pratiques (pp. 177-203). Montréal: Les Éditions Logiques.
38. Maki, A., Yamashita, Y., Ito, Y., Watanabe, E., Mayanagi, Y., & Koizumi, H. (1995). Spatial and temporal analysis of human motor activity using noninvasive NIR topography. Medical Physics, 22(12), 1997-2005.
39. Masson, S. (2007). Enseigner les sciences en s'appuyant sur la neurodidactique des sciences. In P. Potvin, M. Riopel & S. Masson (Eds.), Enseigner les sciences: regards multiples (pp. 308-321). Québec: Éditions MultiMondes.
40. Mazoyer, B. (2001). L'imagerie par résonance magnétique fonctionnelle (IRMf). In O. Houdé, B. Mazoyer & N. Tzourio-Mazoyer (Eds.), Cerveau et psychologie: introduction à l'imagerie cérébrale anatomique et fonctionnelle (pp. 231-256). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
41. Mazoyer, P., Wicker, B., & Fonlupt, P. (2002). A neural network elicited by parametric manipulation of the attention load. NeuroReport, 13(17), 2331.
42. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive Physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 122-130.
43. Murphy, K., & Garavan, H. (2004). An empirical investigation into the number of subjects required for an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 22(2), 879-885.
44. Nelson, J. K., Lizcano, R. A., Atkins, L., & Dunbar, K. (2007, November 17). Conceptuel judgments of expert vs. novice chemistry students: An fRMI study. Paper presented at the 48th Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Hyatt Regency Hotel Long Beach, California.
45. O'Boyle, M. W., & Gill, H. S. (1998). On the relevance of research findings in cognitive neuroscience to educational practice. Educational Psychology Review, 10(4), 397-409.
46. OCDE. (2007). Comprendre le cerveau: Naissance d'une nouvelle science de l'apprentissage. Paris: Éditions de l'OCDE.
47. Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R., & Tank, D. W. (1990). Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87(24), 9868-9872.
48. Ogawa, S., Tank, D. W., Menon, R. S., Ellermann, J. M., Kim, S.-G., Merkle, H., et al. (1992). Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: Functional brain mapping using MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89(5951-5955).
49. Periago, M. C., & Bohigas, X. (2005). A study of second-year engineering students' alternative conceptions about electric potential, current intensity and Ohm's law. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 71-80.
50. Petitto, L.-A., & Dunbar, K. (2004). New findings from educational neuroscience on bilingual brains, scientific brains, and the educated mind. Paper presented at the Conference on Building Usable Knowledge in Mind, Brain, & Education, Havard Graduate School, Cambridge.
51. Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance. Paris: Gallimard.
52. Pintrich, P. R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
53. Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Creso Moyano, J., Myers, C., et al. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature, 414(6863), 546-550.
54. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
55. Reivich, M., Kuhl, D., Wolf, A., Greenberg, J., Phelps, M., Ido, T., et al. (1979). The [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization in man. Circulation Research, 44(1), 127-137.
56. Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York: Teachers College Press.
57. The Royal Society. (2011). Neuroscience: Implications for education and lifelong learning. London: The Royal Society.
58. Thouin, M. (1996). Les conceptions des élèves et les activités d'apprentissage en sciences de la nature au primaire. Montréal: Faculté des sciences de l'éducation de l'Université de Montréal.
59. Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 205-221.
60. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.
61. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
62. Ward, J. (2010). The imaged brain. In J. Ward (Ed.), The Student's Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 48-77). New York: Psychology Press.
63. Worsley, K. J., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Vandal, A. C., Friston, K. J., & Evans, A. C. (1995). A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Imaging, 4, 58-73.
64. Yoncheva, Y. N., Blau, V. C., Maurer, U., & McCandliss, B. D. (2010). Attentional focus during learning impacts N170 ERP responses to an artificial script. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 423-445.