Systemic user experience

Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 337-359

  Borsci, S ^a,b   Kurosu, M ^c   Mele, M L ^d   Federici, S ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF JAPAN   (Japan)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861362575     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Amedi, A., Stern, W. M., Camprodon, J. A., Bermpohl, F., Merabet, L., Rotman, S., et al. (2007). Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nature Neuroscience, 10(6), 687-689. doi:10.1038/nn1912
2. Annett, J. (2002). Subjective rating scales in ergonomics: A reply. Ergonomics, 45(14), 1042-1046. doi:10.1080/00140130210166762
3. Avraamides, M. N., Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., and Golledge, R. G. (2004). Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: Evidence from allocentric judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 801-814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.804
4. Barfield, W., Rosenberg, C., and Levasseur, G. (1991). The use of icons, earcons, and commands in the design of an online hierarchical menu. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 34(2), 8. doi:10.1109/47.87619
5. Benjamin, J. M. J. (1973). The New C-5 Laser Cane for the Blind. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1973 Carnahan Conference on Electronic Prosthetics, New York.
6. Benjamin, J. M. J. (1974). The laser cane. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, 11(2), 443-450.
7. Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., and Üstün, T. B. (1999). Models of disablement, univer-salism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine, 48(9), 1173-1187. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00441-9
8. Blattner, M. M., Sumikawa, D. A., and Greenberg, R. M. (1989). Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(1), 11-44. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0401_1
9. Brewster, S. A. (1997). Using non-speech sound to overcome information overload. Displays, 17(3-4), 179-189. doi:10.1016/S0141-9382(96)01034-7
10. Brewster, S. A. (1998). Using nonspeech sounds to provide navigation cues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 5(3), 224-259. doi:10.1145/292834.292839
11. Brunetti, M., Belardinelli, P., Caulo, M., Del Gratta, C., Della Penna, S., Ferretti, A., et al. (2005). Human brain activation during passive listening to sounds from different locations: An fMRI and MEG study. Human Brain Mapping, 26(4), 251-261. doi:10.1002/hbm.20164
12. Brunetti, M., Della Penna, S., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., Cianflone, F., Belardinelli, P., et al. (2008). A frontoparietal network for spatial attention reorienting in the auditory domain: A human fMRI/MEG study of functional and temporal dynamics. Cerebral Cortex, 18(5), 1139-1147. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm145
13. Bryant, D. J. (1992). A spatial representation system in humans. Psycoloquy, 3(16). Retrieved from http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/psummary?3.16
14. Bryant, D. J. (1997). Representing space in language and perception. Mind and Language, 12(3-4), 239-264. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1997.tb00073.x
15. Craik, K. (1943). The Nature of Exploration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Decety, J., and Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. doi:10.1177/1534582304267187
17. Delogu, F., Palmiero, M., Federici, S., Zhao, H., Plaisant, C., and Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2010). Nonvisual exploration of geographic maps: Does sonification help? Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5(3), 164-174. doi:10.3109/17483100903100277
18. Di Blas, N., Paolini, P., and Speroni, M. (2004). "Usable Accessibility" to the Web for blind Users. Paper presented at the 8th ERCIM Workshop: User Interfaces for All, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi = 10.1.1.110.8239. doi:10.1.1.110.8239
19. Di Giacomo, E., Didimo, W., Grilli, L., and Liotta, G. (2007). Graph visualization techniques for web clustering engines. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(2), 294-304. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2007.40
20. Farmer, L. W., and Smith, D. L. (1998). Adaptive technology. In B. B. Blasch, W. R. Wiener, and R. Welsh (Eds.), Foundations of Orientation and Mobility (2nd ed., pp. 231-259). New York: American Foundation for the Blind Press.
21. Federici, S., and Borsci, S. (2010). Usability evaluation: Models, methods, and applications. In J. Stone and M. Blouin (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation (pp. 1-17). Buffalo, NY: Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE). Retrieved from http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/article.php?id = 277&language = en
22. Federici, S., Borsci, S., and Mele, M. L. (2010a). Usability evaluation with screen reader users: A video presentation of the PCTA's experimental setting and rules. Cognitive Processing, 11(3), 285-288. doi:10.1007/s10339-010-0365-9
23. Federici, S., Borsci, S., Mele, M. L., and Stamerra, G. (2008). Global Rank: Tra popolarità e qualità dei siti Web. [Global Rank: Between popularity and quality of web sites]. Psicotech, 6(1), 7-23. doi:10.1400/113633
24. Federici, S., Borsci, S., Mele, M. L., and Stamerra, G. (2010b). Web popularity: An illusory perception of a qualitative order in information. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9(4), 375-386. doi:10.1007/s10209-009-0179-7
25. Federici, S., Borsci, S., and Stamerra, G. (2010c). Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique. Cognitive Processing, 11(3), 263-272. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0347-y
26. Federici, S., Micangeli, A., Ruspantini, I., Borgianni, S., Corradi, F., Pasqualotto, E., et al. (2005). Checking an integrated model of web accessibility and usability evaluation for disabled people. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(13), 781-790. doi:10.1080/09638280400014766
27. Garrett, J. J. (2003). The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web. New York: New Riders Press.
28. Gaver, W. W. (1986). Auditory icons: Using sound in computer interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 167. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0202_3
29. Golledge, R. G., Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Flury, A., and Yang, X. L. (1991). Designing a personal guidance system to aid navigation without sight: progress on the GIS component. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(4), 373-395. doi:10.1080/02693799108927864
30. GSA's IT Accessibility and Workforce (ITAW). (2010). Resources for understanding and implementing Section 508. Retrieved from http://www.section508.gov
31. Hassenzahl, M., and Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91-97. doi:10.1080/01449290500330331
32. Heyes, A. D. (1984). Sonic Pathfinder: A programmable guidance aid for the blind. Electronics & Wireless World, 90(1579), 26-29 and 62.
33. Horton, S. (2005). Access by Design: A Guide to Universal Usability for Web Designers. New York: New Riders Press.
34. International Standards Organization (ISO). (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
35. International Standards Organization (ISO). (1999). ISO 13407: Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
36. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2000). ISO/TR 18529: Ergonomics-Ergonomics of HumanSystem Interaction-Human-Centred Lifecycle Process Descriptions. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
37. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2001). ISO/IEC Guide 71: Guidelines for Standards Developers to Address the Needs of Older Persons and Persons with Disabilities. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
38. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2002). ISO/TR 16982: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction-Usability Methods Supporting Human-Centred Design. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
39. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2003). ISO/PAS 18152: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Specification for the Process Assessment of Human-System Issues. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
40. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2006a). ISO 20282-1: Ease of Operation of Everyday Products-Part 1: Design Requirements for Context of Use and User Characteristics. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
41. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2006b). ISO 20282-2: Ease of Operation of Everyday Products-Part 2: Test Method for Walk-Up-and-Use Products. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
42. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2006c). ISO/IEC 25062: Software Engineering-Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)-Common Industry Format (CIF) for Usability Test Reports. Geneva, Switerland: ISO.
43. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2007a). ISO/PAS 20282-3: Ease of Operation of Everyday Products-Part 3: Test Methods for Consumer Products. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
44. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2007b). ISO/PAS 20282-4: Ease of Operation of Everyday Products-Part 4: Test Method for the Installation of Consumer Products. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
45. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2008). ISO 9241-171: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction-Part 171: Guidance on Software Accessibility. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
46. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2009). ISO 9241-20: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction-Part 20: Accessibility Guidelines for Information/Communication Technology (ICT) Equipment and Services. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
47. International Standards Organization (ISO). (2010). ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction-Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
48. Japanese Standards Association (JSA). (2006). JIS X 8341-5. Tokyo: JSA.
49. Kay, L. (1964). An ultrasonic sensing probe as a mobility aid for the blind. Ultrasonics, 2(2), 53-59. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(64)90382-8
50. Kay, L. (1974). A sonar aid to enhance spatial perception of the blind: Engineering design and evaluation. Radio and Electronic Engineer, 44(11), 605-627. doi:10.1049/ree.1974.0148
51. Kay, L. (2000). Auditory perception of objects by blind persons, using a bioacoustic high resolution sonar. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(6), 3266-3275.
52. Kay, L. (2001). Bioacoustic spatial perception by humans: A controlled laboratory measurement of spatial resolution without distal cues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 803-808. doi:10.1121/1.1336138
53. Kirakowski, J. (2002). Is ergonomics empirical? Ergonomics, 45(14-15), 995-997. doi:10.1080/00140130210166889
54. Kramer, G., Walker, B., Bonebright, T., Cook, P., Flowers, J., Miner, N., et al. (1997). Sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda. Retrieved from http://sonify.psych.gatech.edu/publications/pdfs/1999-NSF-Report.pdf
55. Kurosu, M. (2010). Concept Structure of UX (User Experience) and Its Measurement. Paper presented at the APCHI & Ergofuture 2010: Joint International Conference of APCHI (Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction) 2010 and Ergofuture 2010, Bali, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://iea.cc/ upload/Ergofuture%202010%20Brochure.pdf
56. Kurosu, M., and Ando, M. (2008). The Psychology of Non-Selection and Waste: A Tentative Approach for Constructing the User Behavior Theory Based on the Artifact Development Analysis. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Convention of Japanese Psychological Association, Osaka University, Japan. Retrieved from http://www.wdc-jp.biz/jpa/conf2010/
57. Lakatos, S. (1993). Recognition of complex auditory-spatial patterns. Perception, 22(3), 363-374.
58. Law, E. L.-C., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Hassenzahl, M., and Blythe, M. (2007, September 3-7). Towards a UX Manifesto. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI '07, University of Lancaster, UK.
59. Lazar, J. (Ed.). (2007). Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse User Populations. West Sussex, UK: Wiley and Sons.
60. Mast, F., Jäncke, L., Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Avraamides, M., Lippa, Y., et al. (2007). Functional Equivalence of Spatial Images Produced by Perception and Spatial Language. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_3
61. Meijer, P. B. L. (1992). An experimental system for auditory image representations. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 39(2), 112-121. doi:10.1109/10.121642
62. Mele, M. L., Borsci, S., Rugo, A., Federici, S., Liotta, G., Trotta, F., et al. (2009). An accessible web searching: An on-going research project. In P. L. Emiliani, L. Burzagli, A. Como, F. Gabbanini and A.-L. Salminen (Eds.), Assistive Technology from Adapted Equipment to Inclusive Environments: AAATE '09 (Vol. 25, p. 854). Florence, Italy: IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-042-1-854
63. Mele, M. L., Federici, S., Borsci, S., and Liotta, G. (2010). Beyond a visuocentric way of a visual web search clustering engine: The sonification of WhatsOnWeb. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler and A. Karshmer (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Vol. 1, pp. 351-357). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_56
64. Meltzoff, A. N., and Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 491-500. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1261
65. Merabet, L., Pogge, D., Stern, W. M., Bhatt, E., Hemond, C., Maguire, S., et al. (2008). Activation of Visual Cortex Using Crossmodal Retinotopic Mapping. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM): HBM '08, Melburne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.seeingwithsound.com/hbm2008.html
66. Millar, S. (1994). Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children. New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Morrissette, D. L., Goodrich, G. L., and Hennessey, J. J. (1981). A follow-up study of the Mowat Sensor's applications, frequency of use, and maintenance reliability. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 75(6), 244-247.
68. Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. L. Steven (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 7-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
69. Norman, D. A. (1998). The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer is So Complex, and Information Appliances are the Solution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Norman, D. A., Miller, J., and Henderson, A. (1995, May 7-11). What You See, Some of What's in the Future, and How We Go about Doing It: HI at Apple Computer. Paper presented at the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI '95, Denver, CO. doi:10.1145/ 223355.223477
71. Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Federici, S., Delogu, F., and Palmiero, M. (2009). Sonification of spatial information: Audio-tactile exploration strategies by normal and blind subjects. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2009, LNCS 5615 (pp. 557-563). Berlin: SpringerVerlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_62
72. Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Santangelo, V., Botta, F., and Federici, S. (2007). Are vertical meridian effects due to audio-visual interference? A new confirmation with deaf subjects. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(10), 797-804. doi:10.1080/ 09638280600919780
73. Petrie, H., and Bevan, N. (2009). The evaluation of accessibility, usability, and user experience. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), The Universal Access Handbook (pp. 299-314). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
74. Petrie, H., and Kheir, O. (2007). The Relationship between Accessibility and Usability of Websites. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240688. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240688
75. Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., and Hoonhout, J. (2011). User Experience White Paper. Result from Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, September 15-18, 2010. Retrieved from http:// www.allaboutux.org/files/UX-WhitePaper.pdf
76. Roulstone, A. (2010). Access and accessibility. In J. Stone and M. Blouin (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation (pp. 1-12). Buffalo, NY: Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE). Retrieved from http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/ency-clopedia/article.php?id = 153&language = en
77. Rugo, A., Mele, M. L., Liotta, G., Trotta, F., Di Giacomo, E., Borsci, S., et al. (2009). A visual son-ificated web search clustering engine. Cognitive Processing, 10(Suppl 2), 286-289. doi:10.1007/ s10339-009-0317-4
78. Scherer, M. J., and DiCowden, M. A. (2008). Organizing future research and intervention efforts on the impact and effects of gender differences on disability and rehabilitation: The usefulness of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(3), 161-165. doi:10.1080/09638280701532292
79. Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Zurek, P. M., Stutman, E. R., and Berkovitz, R. (1996). Perception of Azimuth for Sources Simulated Using Two Loudspeakers in Natural Listening Environments. Paper presented at the 19th Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
80. Shneiderman, B. (2003). Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Sumikawa, K. A., Blattner, M. M., Joy, K. I., and Greenberg, R. M. (1985). Guidelines for the Syntactic Design of Audio Cues in Computer Interfaces. (UCRL-93464).
82. Thinus-Blanc, C., and Gaunet, F. (1997). Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense? Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 20-42. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.20
83. Ungar, S., Blades, M., and Spencer, C. (1997). Strategies for knowledge acquisition from cartographic maps by blind and visually impaired adults. Cartographic Journal, 34(2), 93-110.
84. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). (2006). Introduction to Web Accessibility. Retrieved from http:// www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php
85. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
86. World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
87. Zhao, H., Plaisant, C., and Shneiderman, B. (2005). "I Hear the Pattern": Interactive Sonification of Geographical Data Patterns. Paper presented at the CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, OR. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?doid = 1056808.1057052
88. Zhao, H., Plaisant, C., Shneiderman, B., and Duraiswami, R. (2004, July 6-9). Sonification of Geo-Referenced Data for Auditory Information Seeking: Design Principle and Pilot Study. Paper presented at the 10th Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display: ICAD '04, Sydney, Austrailia. doi:10.1.1.140.8467-1
89. Zhao, H., Plaisant, C., Shneiderman, B., and Lazar, J. (2008). Data sonification for users with visual Impairment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(1), 1-28. doi:10.1145/ 1352782.1352786
90. Zimmer, H. D. (2001). The interface between language and visuo-spatial representations. In M. Denis, R. Logie, C. Cornoldo, M. de Vega and J. EngelKamp (Eds.), Imagery, Language and Visuo-Spatial Thinking (pp. 109-136). London: Psychology Press.
91. Zola, I. K. (1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Quarterly, 67(Suppl 2 Pt. 2), 401-428. doi:10.2307/3350151