Visual assessment of Camouflaged targets with different background similarities

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 527-541

  Chang, Chi Chan ^a   Lee, Yung Hui ^a   Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe ^a   Liu, Bor Shong ^b   Shih, Yuh Chuan ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OCULOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861351816     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: 1558688X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/24.PMS.114.2.527-541     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bennett, P. J., & Banks, M. S. (1987) Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms underlies phase anomalies in peripheral vision. Nature, 326, 873-876.
2. Copeland, A. C., & Trivedi, M. M. (2001) Computational models for search and discrimination. Optical Engineering, 40, 1885-1895.
3. Guilan, S., & Shunqing, T. (1997) Method for spectral pattern recognition of color camouflage. Optical Engineering, 36, 1779-1781.
4. Hess, R. F., & Dakin, S. C. (1997) Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision. Nature, 390, 602-604.
5. Hogervorst, M. A., Toet, A., & Jacobs, P. (2010) Design and evaluation of (urban) camouflage. SPIE, 7662, 1-11.
6. Huimin, L., Xiuchun, W., Shouzhong, L., Meide, S., & Aike, G. (1999) The possible mechanism underlying visual anti-camouflage: a model and its real-time simulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 29, 314-318.
7. Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, T. (1975) Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 255-260.
8. Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. L. (2001) Psychophysics of reading: XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41, 725-734.
9. Leibowitz, H. W., & Appelle, S. (1969) The effect of a central task on luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli. Human Factors, 11, 387-392.
10. Lindqvist, S., Vik, T., Indredavik, M. S., & Brubakk, A. M. (2007) Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, peripheral vision and refraction in low birthweight teenagers. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 85, 157-164.
11. Ludmer, R., Dudai, Y., & Rubin, N. (2011) Uncovering camouflage: amygdala activation predicts long-term memory of induced perceptual insight. Neuron, 69, 1002-1014.
12. Müller, T., & Müller, M. (2008) CACAMO: computer-aided camouflage assessment of moving objects. SPIE, 6941, 1-12.
13. Rentschler, I., & Treutwein, B. (1985) Loss of spatial phase relationships in extra foveal vision. Nature, 313, 308-310.
14. Tankus, A., & Yeshurun, Y. (2009) Computer vision, camouflage breaking, and counter shading. Philosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciences, 364, 529-536.
15. Thorpe, S. J., Gegenfurtner K. R., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001) Detection of animals in natural images using far peripheral vision. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 869-876.
16. Toet, A., Kooi, F. L., Bijl, P., & Valeton, J. M. (1998) Visual conspicuity determines human target acquisition performance. Optical Engineering, 37, 1969-1975.
17. Troscianko, T., Benton, C. P., Lovell, P. G., Tolhurst, D. J., & Pizlo, Z. (2009) Camouflage and visual perception. Philosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciences, 364, 449-461.
18. Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2002) A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9, 81-84.
19. Webster, R. B., & Haslerud, G. M. (1964) Influence of extreme peripheral vision of attention to a visual or auditory task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 269-272.
20. Werner, E. B., & Rossi, C. (1991) Manual of visual fields. New York: Churchill Livingstone.