The triple helix of Plantago lanceolata: Genetics and the environment interact to determine population dynamics

Ecology

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 793-802

  Shefferson, Richard P ^a   Roach, Deborah A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohort effect; Demography; Life table response experiment (LTRE); Phenotypic plasticity; Plantago lanceolata; Population dynamics; Population projection matrix model; Stochastic growth rate

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GROWTH RATE; LIFE TABLE; NATURAL SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION ECOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION MODELING; STOCHASTICITY; WILD POPULATION;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTAGO; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BREEDING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GENOTYPE; PLANTAGO; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS;

PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA;

EID: 84861350368     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/11-0742.1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barfield, M., R. D. Holt, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2011. Evolution in stage-structured populations. American Naturalist 177:397-409.
2. Beissinger, S. R. 2002. Population viability analysis: past, present, future. Pages 5-17 in S. R. Beissinger and D. R. McCullough, editors. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
3. Beissinger, S. R., and M. I. Westphal. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:821-841. (Pubitemid 28348855)
4. Beissinger, S. R., J. M. Wunderle, J. M. Meyers, B.-E. Sæther, and S. Engen. 2008. Anatomy of a bottleneck: diagnosing factors limiting population growth in the Puerto Rican parrot. Ecological Monographs 78:185-203.
5. Bennington, C. C., and J. B. McGraw. 1995a. Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecological Monographs 65:303-324.
6. Bennington, C. C., and J. B. McGraw. 1995b. Phenotypic selection in an artificial population of Impatiens pallida: the importance of the invisible fraction. Evolution 49:317-324.
7. Benton, T. G., and A. Grant. 1999. Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:467-471. (Pubitemid 29513221)
8. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Second edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
9. Darwin, C. 1859. The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London, UK.
10. de Kroon, H., A. Plaisier, J. van Groenendael, and H. Caswell. 1986. Elasticity: the relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67:1427-1431.
11. Doak, D. F., D. Thomson, and E. S. Jules. 2002. Population viability analysis for plants: understanding the demographic consequences of seed banks for population health. Pages 312-337 in S. R. Beissinger and D. R. McCullough, editors. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
12. Franco, M., and J. Silvertown. 2004. A comparative demography of plants based upon elasticities of vital rates. Ecology 85:531-538. (Pubitemid 38319119)
13. Glinka, S., L. Ometto, S. Mousset, W. Stephan, and D. de Lorenzo. 2003. Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multilocus approach. Genetics 165:1269-1278. (Pubitemid 38020248)
14. Goodman, S. J., H. B. Tamate, R. Wilson, J. Nagata, S. Tatsuzawa, G. M. Swanson, J. M. Pemberton, and D. R. McCullough. 2001. Bottlenecks, drift and differentiation: the population structure and demographic history of sika deer (Cervus nippon) in the Japanese archipelago. Molecular Ecology 10:1357-1370. (Pubitemid 32526112)
15. Gros, A., H. J. Poethke, and T. Hovestadt. 2006. Evolution of local adaptations in dispersal strategies. Oikos 114:544-552. (Pubitemid 44944219)
16. Gross, K., G. Pasinelli, and H. P. Kunc. 2010. Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment. American Naturalist 176:456-464.
17. Hairston, N. G., S. P. Ellner, M. A. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J. A. Fox. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters 8:1114-1127. (Pubitemid 41345842)
18. Holford, T. R. 1983. The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates. Biometrics 39:311-324.
19. Kalisz, S., and M. A. McPeek. 1992. Demography of an agestructured annual: resampled projection matrices, elasticity analyses, and seed bank effects. Ecology 73:1082-1093.
20. Kerkhoff, A. J., and F. Ballantyne. 2003. The scaling of reproductive variability in trees. Ecology Letters 6:850-856. (Pubitemid 37105916)
21. Knudsen, E. I. 1998. Capacity for plasticity in the adult owl auditory system expanded by juvenile experience. Science 279:1531-1533. (Pubitemid 28217076)
22. Kokko, H., and A. López-Sepulcre. 2007. The ecogenetic link between demography and evolution: can we bridge the gap between theory and data? Ecology Letters 10:773-782. (Pubitemid 47174414)
23. Lindström, J., and H. Kokko. 2002. Cohort effects and population dynamics. Ecology Letters 5:338-344. (Pubitemid 34523100)
24. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
25. May, R. 1973. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
26. Menges, E. S. 2000. Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:51-56. (Pubitemid 30349802)
27. Metcalf, C. J. E., and S. Pavard. 2007. Why evolutionary biologists should be demographers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:205-212. (Pubitemid 46427951)
28. Metcalfe, N. B., and P. Monaghan. 2001. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:254-260. (Pubitemid 32288153)
29. Nagata, J., R. Masuda, K. Kaji, M. Kaneko, and M. C. Yoshida. 1998. Genetic variation and population structure of the Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) in Hokkaido Island, based on mitochondrial D-loop sequences. Molecular Ecology 7:871-877. (Pubitemid 28348678)
30. Nussey, D. H., L. E. B. Kruuk, A. Donald, M. Fowlie, and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 2006. The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. Ecology Letters 9:1342-1350. (Pubitemid 44789726)
31. Nussey, D. H., L. E. B. Kruuk, A. Morris, and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 2007. Environmental conditions in early life influence ageing rates in a wild population of red deer. Current Biology 17:R1000-R1001. (Pubitemid 350180458)
32. Pfister, C. A. 1998. Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:213-218. (Pubitemid 28103933)
33. Pfister, C. A., and F. R. Stevens. 2003. Individual variation and environmental stochasticity: implications for matrix model predictions. Ecology 84:496-510. (Pubitemid 36893086)
34. Pfister, C. A., and M. Wang. 2005. Beyond size: matrix projection models for populations where size is an incomplete descriptor. Ecology 86:2673-2683. (Pubitemid 41408063)
35. Philippi, T., and J. Seger. 1989. Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4:41-44.
36. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
37. Reznick, D. N., F. H. Shaw, F. H. Rodd, and R. G. Shaw. 1997. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934-1937.
38. Roach, D. A. 1986. Life history variation in Geranium carolinianum. 1. Covariation between characters at different stages of the life cycle. American Naturalist 128:47-57.
39. Roach, D. A. 1993. Evolutionary senescence in plants. Genetica 91:53-64. (Pubitemid 2033393)
40. Roach, D. A. 2003. Age-specific demography in Plantago: variation among cohorts in a natural plant population. Ecology 84:749-756. (Pubitemid 36893061)
41. Roach, D. A., and J. Gampe. 2004. Age-specific demography in Plantago: uncovering age-dependent mortality in a natural population. American Naturalist 164:60-69. (Pubitemid 38991832)
42. Roach, D. A., C. E. Ridley, and J. L. Dudycha. 2009. Longitudinal analysis of Plantago: age by environment interactions reveal aging. Ecology 90:1427-1433.
43. Sæther, B.-E., and Ø. Bakke. 2000. Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642-653. (Pubitemid 30437990)
44. Salguero-Gomez, R., and J. B. Plotkin. 2010. Matrix dimensions bias demographic inferences: implications for comparative plant demography. American Naturalist 176:710-722.
45. Schoener, T. W. 2011. The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331:426-429.
46. Shefferson, R. P., and D. A. Roach. 2010. Longitudinal analysis of Plantago: adaptive benefits of iteroparity in a short-lived, herbaceous perennial. Ecology 91:441-447.
47. SPSS. 2010. SPSS PASW Statistics 18.0. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
48. Stubben, C. J., and B. G. Milligan. 2007. Estimating and analyzing demographic models using the popbio package in R. Journal of Statistical Software 22:11.
49. Thompson, J. D. 1991. Phenotypic plasticity as a component of evolutionary change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:246-249. (Pubitemid 121002985)
50. Tuljapurkar, S., U. K. Steiner, and S. H. Orzack. 2009. Dynamic heterogeneity in life histories. Ecology Letters 12:93-106.
51. van der Aart, P. J. M., and J. C. Aulto. 1992. Biogeography and human effects. Pages 5-6 in P. J. C. Kuiper and M. Bos, editors. Plantago: a multidisciplinary study. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
52. van Groenendael, J. M., and P. Slim. 1988. The contrasting dynamics of two populations of Plantago lanceolata classified by age and size. Journal of Ecology 76:585-599. (Pubitemid 19321963)
53. van Tienderen, P. H., and J. van der Toorn. 1991. Genetic differentiation between populations of Plantago lanceolata. I. Local adaptation in three contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 79:27-42.
54. Vekemans, X., and O. J. Hardy. 2004. New insights from finescale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Molecular Ecology 13:921-935. (Pubitemid 38390597)
55. Via, S., R. Gomulkiewicz, G. de Jong, S. M. Scheiner, C. D. Schlichting, and P. H. van Tienderen. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:212-217.