Comparison of chemical cleaning reagents and characterization of foulants of nanofiltration membranes used in surface water treatment

Desalination

Volumn 296, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-6

  Espinasse, Benjamin P ^a   Chae, So Ryong ^b   Marconnet, Cyril ^c   Coulombel, Claire ^d   Mizutani, Claire ^a   Djafer, Malik ^c   Heim, Véronique ^d   Wiesner, Mark R ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Veolia Eau Compagnie Generale des Eaux   (France)

^d Syndicat des Eaux d'Ile de France (SEDIF)   (France)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Contact angle; Filtration plant; Membrane cleaning; Nanofiltration membrane; Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL AGENT; FILTRATION PLANTS; FOULANTS; IN-LINE; MEMBRANE CLEANING; MEMBRANE REJECTION; MEMBRANE SURFACE; SPECIFIC ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBANCE; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CLEANING; CONTACT ANGLE; METAL CLEANING; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

MICROFILTRATION;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; FILTRATION; FOULING; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE WATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84861343885     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sarkar B., Venkateswralu N., Rao R.N., Bhattacharjee C., Kale V. Treatment of pesticide contaminated surface water for production of potable water by a coagulation-adsorption-nanofiltration approach. Desalination Jun 25 2007, 212(1-3):129-140.
2. Liu S.B., LePuil M., Taylor J.S., Randall A.A. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis biostability relative to alternative methods of water treatment. J. Water Supply Res. Technol.-Aqua Feb 2007, 56(1):25-40.
3. Kim H.A., Choi J.H., Takizawa S. Comparison of initial filtration resistance by pretreatment processes in the nanofiltration for drinking water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. Sep 15 2007, 56(3):354-362.
4. Costa A.R., de Pinho M.N. Comparison of the performance of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration in surface water treatment. Desalination Nov 20 2006, 199(1-3):73-75.
5. Costa A.R., de Pinho M.N. Performance and cost estimation of nanofiltration for surface water treatment in drinking water production. Desalination Sep 5 2006, 196(1-3):55-65.
6. Wang Z., Zhao Y.Y., Wang J.X., Wang S.C. Studies on nanofiltration membrane fouling in the treatment of water solutions containing humic acids. Desalination Jul 2005, 178(1-3):171-178. [Article; Proceedings Paper].
7. Horsch P., Gorenflo A., Fuder C., Deleage A., Frimmel F.H. Biofouling of ultra- and nanofiltration membranes for drinking water treatment characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Desalination Feb 1 2005, 172(1):41-52.
8. Orecki A., Tomaszewska M., Karakulski K., Morawski A.W. Surface water treatment by the nanofiltration method. Desalination Mar 10 2004, 162(1-3):47-54.
9. Thanuttamavong M., Yamamoto K., Oh J.I., Choo K.H., Choi S.J. Rejection characteristics of organic and inorganic pollutants by ultra low-pressure nanofiltration of surface water for drinking water treatment. Desalination Sep 10 2002, 145(1-3):257-264.
10. Reiss C.R., Taylor J.S., Robert C. Surface water treatment using nanofiltration-pilot testing results and design considerations. Desalination Nov 1 1999, 125(1-3):97-112.
11. van Paassen J.A.M., Kruithof J.C., Bakker S.M., Kegel F.S. Integrated multi-objective membrane systems for surface water treatment: pre-treatment of nanofiltration by riverbank filtration and conventional ground water treatment. Desalination Sep 20 1998, 118(1-3):239-248.
12. Ventresque C., Bablon G. The integrated nanofiltration system of the Mery-sur-Oise surface water treatment plant (37 mgd). Desalination Nov 30 1997, 113(2-3):263-266.
13. Meireles M., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Effects of protein fouling on the apparent pore-size distribution of sieving membranes. J. Membr. Sci. Feb 1991, 56(1):13-28. [Article].
14. Luis P., Saquib M., Vinckier C., Van der Bruggen B. Effect of membrane filtration on ozonation efficiency for removal of atrazine from surface water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Jul 2011, 50(14):8686-8692. [Article].
15. Goncharuk V.V., Kavitskaya A.A., Skil'skaya M.D. Nanofiltration in drinking water supply. J. Water Chem. Tech. Feb 2011, 33(1):37-54. [Article].
16. Huang H., Schwab K., Jacangelo J.G. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review. Environ. Sci. Technol. May 2009, 43(9):3011-3019. [Review].
17. Methatham T., Ratanatamskul C. Effect of a longer cleaning-frequency period on nanofiltration membrane fouling for long-term water supply production. Desalin. Water Treat. Aug 2011, 32(1-3):256-261. [Article; Proceedings Paper].
18. Li Q.L., Elimelech M. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. Sep 2004, 38(17):4683-4693. [Article].
19. Liikanen R., Yli-Kuivila J., Laukkanen R. Efficiency of various chemical cleanings for nanofiltration membrane fouled by conventionally-treated surface water. J. Membr. Sci. Jan 2002, 195(2):265-276. [Article].
20. Gaudichet-Maurin E., Thominette F. Ageing of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes in contact with bleach solutions. J. Membr. Sci. Oct 5 2006, 282(1-2):198-204.
21. Rouaix S., Causserand C., Aimar P. Experimental study of the effects of hypochlorite on polysulfone membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. Jun 1 2006, 277(1-2):137-147.
22. Sohrabi M.R., Madaeni S.S., Khosravi M., Ghaedi A.M. Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes fouled by licorice aqueous solutions. Desalination Feb 2011, 267(1):93-100. [Article].