Improving aviation safety with information visualization: A flight simulation study

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 441-450

  Aragon, Cecilia E ^a   Hearst, Marti A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Airflow hazards; Augmented reality; Flight deck displays; Helicopters; Human factors in aviation; Information visualization; Presentation of safety critical information

Indexed keywords

AVIATION; HELICOPTERS; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AIRFLOW HAZARDS; FLIGHT-DECK DISPLAYS; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

EID: 84861292441     PISSN: 02749696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Advanced Rotorcraft Technology, Inc., 1685 Plymouth St., Suite 250, Mountain View, CA, USA 94043, http://www.flightlab.com.
2. Alter, K.W., Barrows, A.K., Jennings, C., Powell, J.D. 3-D Perspective Primary Flight Displays for Aircraft. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, (2000).
3. Aragon, C. Usability Evaluation of a Flight-Deck Airflow Hazard Visualization System. 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (2004).
4. Bailey, R.E., Parrish, R.V., Kramer, L J., Harrah, S.D., Arthur, J.J. III. Technical Challenges In the Development of a NASA Synthetic Vision System Concept. NATO RTA (2003).
5. Brita, C. L., Kelly, C. W. User's Guide for an Airborne Doppler Weather Radar Simulation (ADWRS), NASA TPAWS (2002).
6. Buning, P. Numerical algorithms in CFD post-processing, Computer Graphics and Flow Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series 1989-07.
7. Chambers, J. Concept to Reality, NASA SP-2003-4529, http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Concept2Reality/wind_shear.html.
8. Endsley, M.R. Designing for Situation Awareness in Complex Systems, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on symbiosis of humans, artifacts and environment, Kyoto, Japan (2001).
9. FAA National Aviation Safety Analysis Center, https://www.nasdac.faa.gov/.
10. Furmanski, C., Azuma, R. and Daily, M., Augmented-reality visualizations guided by cognition: Perceptual heuristics for combining visible and obscured information. Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2002), 2002, 215-224.
11. He, C. and Goericke, J., Army ART TR 2011 - DAAH10-03-C-0001, FLIGHTLAB UH-60L Simulation Model Validation, 2004.
12. Holforty, W. Flight-Deck Display of Neighboring Aircraft Wake Vortices, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University (2003).
13. Julier, S., Lanzagorta, M., Baillot, Y. and Brown, D. Information Filtering for Mobile Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22 (5), 2002, 12-15.
14. Kao, C.-Y. J., Cooper, D.I., Reisner, J.M., Eichinger, W.E., and Ghil, M. Probing Atmospheric Turbulence with High-Resolution Lidar and Models, J. Geophys. Res. (2002) 107(D9): 7 1-7.10.
15. Lane, D.A. Visualizing Time-Varying Phenomena in Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Flows, NASA NAS Technical Report NAS-96-001 (1996).
16. Latorella, K., Chamberlain, J. Graphical Weather Information System Evaluation: Usability, Perceived Utility, and Preferences from General Aviation Pilots, NASA AWIN technical report (2002).
17. Lee, A.T. Aircrew Decision-Making Behavior in Hazardous Weather Avoidance, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (1991).
18. Max, N., Becker, B., Crawfis, R. Flow Volumes for Interactive Vector Field Visualization, Proceedings of Visualization 93, IEEE Computer Society Press (1993), 19-23.
19. McCann, R.S., Foyle, D.C. Superimposed symbology: Attentional problems and design solutions, SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 103 (1994), 2009-2016.
20. Mewhinney, M. Flow over helicopter carriers, NASA Ames Astrogram, October 30, 1998.
21. Milgram, P. and Kishino, F. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D (12), 1994.
22. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Lidar Tutorial, http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/sparcle/sparcle_tutorial.html.
23. Naval Safety Center Aviation Data Analysis Division, http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/aviation/aviationdata/default.htm.
24. Orlady, H.W. The professional airline pilot of today: All the old skills-and more. International Airline Pilot Training Seminar, Caracas, Venezuela (1989).
25. Particle Image Velocimetry at NASA Glenn, http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/OptInstr/piv/background.htm.
26. Post, F., van Wijk, J. Visual representation of vector fields: recent developments and research directions, Scientific Visualization Advances and Challenges, Academic Press (1993), 367-390.
27. Prinzel, L. Head-Up Displays and Attention Capture, NASA Technical Memorandum 2004-213000.
28. Roscoe, S.N. Airborne displays for flight and navigation, Human Factors, 10 (1968), 321-322.
29. Shaw, C.D., Jiang, F.T., Parry, R.M., Plale, B., Wasilewski, A., Ribarsky, W., Faust, N.L. Real-Time Weather Data on Terrain, NASA AWIN, SPIE Vol. #4368, Radar Sensor Technology and Data Visualization (2001).
30. Spence, R. Information Visualization, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press (2001).
31. Spirkovska, L., Lodha, S.K. AWE: Aviation weather data visualization environment, Computers and Graphics, 26 (2002), 169.
32. Spitzer, C. R., Parrish, R.V., Baize, D.G., Lewis, M.S. The Avionics Handbook: Synthetic Vision, NASA Aviation Safety Program (2001).
33. Strid, T., Rizzi, A., Oppelstrup, J. Development and use of some flow visualization algorithms, Computer Graphics and Flow Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series 1989-07 (1989).
34. Strope, K., Borden, C. and Harding, J., Verification and Validation of a UH-60 FLIGHTLAB model in support of the UH-60M Limited User Test. American Helicopter Society 60th Annual Forum (2004).
35. Sujudi, D., Haimes, R. Identification of Swirling Flow in 3D Vector Fields, AIAA Paper 95-1715, San Diego, CA, USA (1995).
36. Switzer, G., Britt, C. Performance of the NASA Airborne Radar with the Windshear Database for Forward-Looking Systems, NASA CR 201607 (1996).
37. Turner, B., Leclerc, M.Y., Gauthier, M., Moore, K., and Fitzjarrald, D. Identification of Turbulence Structures above a Forest Canopy using the Wavelet Transform, J. Geophys. Res. 99 D1 (1994), 1919-1926.
38. Uenking, M.D., Hughes, M.F. The Efficacy of Using Synthetic Vision Terrain-Textured Images to Improve Pilot Situation Awareness, SAE World Aviation Congress (2002).
39. United States Department of Commerce, 1986, The Crash of Delta Flight 191 at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport on 2 August 1985: Multiscale Analysis of Weather Conditions, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA.
40. United States Navy, A1-H60BB-NFM-000, NATOPS Flight Manual - Navy Model SH-60B Aircraft (2004).
41. Wallace, L. Airborne Trailblazer, NASA Langley Wind Shear Program (1993), http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/trailblazer/SP-4216/.
42. Wickens, C.D., Carbonari, R., Merwin, D., Morphew, E., O'Brien, J. Cockpit Displays to Support Hazard Awareness in Free Flight. NASA Technical Report ARL-97-7/NASA-97-4 (1997).
43. Wilkinson, C.H., Zan, S.J., Gilbert, N.E., Funk, J.D. Modelling and Simulation of Ship Air Wakes for Helicopter Operations. Fluid Dynamics Problems of Vehicles Operating Near or in the Air-Sea Interface RTO-MP-15 (1999).
44. Williams, S.L., Long, K.R. Dynamic Interface Flight Tests and the Pilot Rating Scale. American Helicopter Soc. 53rd Annual Forum (1997).