The effect of contact line dynamics and drop formation on measured values of receding contact angle at very low capillary numbers

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Volumn 404, Issue , 2012, Pages 63-69

  Moraila Martínez, Carmen L ^a   Montes Ruiz Cabello, Francisco J ^b   Cabrerizo Vílchez, Miguel A ^a   Rodríguez Valverde, Miguel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Drop formation; Moving contact lines; Receding contact angle; Sessile drop; Steady motion

Indexed keywords

DROP FORMATION; ELECTRIC CONTACTS; FLOW RATE; HYSTERESIS; METALLIC COMPOUNDS; TITANIUM;

CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; CONTACT LINES; CONTACT-LINE DYNAMICS; DISTILLED WATER; DYNAMIC CONTACT ANGLE; LOW CAPILLARY NUMBERS; MEASURING METHOD; METAL OXIDES; MOVING CONTACT LINES; POLYMER SURFACES; QUADRATIC FLOW; RECEDING CONTACT; SESSILE DROPS; STATIC CONTACT ANGLE; STEADY MOTION; VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE; WILHELMY BALANCE;

CONTACT ANGLE;

POLITEF; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYCARBONATE; POLYMER; POLYSTYRENE; POLYVINYLCHLORIDE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTACT ANGLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYNAMICS; FLOW RATE; GRAVITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYSTERESIS; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SESSILE SPECIES; STEADY STATE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURFACE TENSION;

EID: 84861229001     PISSN: 09277757     EISSN: 18734359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adamson A.W. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces 1990, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 5th edition.
2. Handbook of Surface and Colloid Chemistry 1997, CRC Press, LLC 2000 Corporate Blvd, N.W., Boca Raton, Florida, 33431. K. Birdi (Ed.).
3. Cwikel D., Zhao Q., Liu C., Su X., Marmur A. Comparing contact angle measurements and surface tension assessments of solid surfaces. Langmuir 2010, 26:15289-15294.
4. Erbil H.Y., McHale G., Rowan S.M., Newton M.I. Determination of the receding contact angle of sessile drops on polymer surfaces by evaporation. Langmuir 1999, 15:7378-7385.
5. Mognetti B.M., Yeomans J.M. Modeling receding contact lines on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 2010, 26:18162-18168.
6. Chibowski E. Apparent surface free energy of superhydrophobic surfaces. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25:1323-1336.
7. Meuler A.J., Smith J.D., Varanasi K.K., Mabry J.M., McKinley G.H., Cohen R.E. Relationships between water wettability and ice adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2:3100-3110.
8. Brugnara M., Degasperi E., Della-Volpe C., Maniglio D., Penati A., Siboni S., Toniolo L., Poli T., Invernizzi S., Castelvetro V. The application of the contact angle in monument protection: new materials and methods. Colloids Surf. A 2004, 241:299-312.
9. Decker E.L., Frank B., Suo Y., Garoff S. Physics of contact angle measurement. Colloids Surf. A 1999, 156:177-189.
10. Krishnan A., Liu Y.H., Cha P., Woodward R., Allara D., Vogler E.A. An evaluation of methods for contact angle measurement. Colloids Surf. B 2005, 43:95-98.
11. Strobel M., Lyons C.S. An essay on contact angle measurements. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8:8-13.
12. Erbil H.Y. Surface Chemistry of Solid and Liquid Interfaces 2006, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 308-337.
13. Kietzig A.-M. Comments on an essay on contact angle measurements - an illustration of the respective influence of droplet deposition and measurement parameters. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8:1003-1009.
14. Pierce E., Carmona F., Amirfazli A. Understanding of sliding and contact angle results in tilted plate experiments. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2008, 323:73-82.
15. Brutin D., Zhu Z., Rahli O., Xie J., Liu Q., Tadrist L. Sessile drop in microgravity: Creation, contact angle and interface. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 2009, 21:67-76.
16. Bormashenko E., Bormashenko Y., Whyman G., Pogreb R., Musin A., Jager R., Barkay Z. Contact angle hysteresis on polymer substrates established with various experimental techniques, its interpretation, and quantitative characterization. Langmuir 2008, 24:4020-4025.
17. Blake T.D. The physics of moving wetting lines. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 299:1-13.
18. Kwok D., Lin R., Mui M., Neumann A. Low-rate dynamic and static contact angles and the determination of solid surface tensions. Colloids Surf. A 1996, 116:63-77.
19. Long J., Chen P. On the role of energy barriers in determining contact angle hysteresis. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 127:55-66.
20. Tavana H., Neumann A. On the question of rate-dependence of contact angles. Colloids Surf. A 2006, 282:256-262.
21. Ruiz-Cabello F.J.M., Rodríguez-Valverde M.A., Cabrerizo-Vílchez M.A. Contact angle hysteresis on polymer surfaces: an experimental study. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25:2039-2049.
22. Kwok D., Gietzelt T., Grundke K., Jacobasch H., Neumann A. Contact angle measurements and contact angle interpretation.1. contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a goniometer sessile drop technique. Langmuir 1997, 13:2880-2894.
23. Amirfazli A., Neumann A. Status of the three-phase line tension: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 3:110.
24. Lam C.N.C., Wu R., Li D., Hair M.L., Neumann A.W. Study of the advancing and receding contact angles: liquid sorption as a cause of contact angle hysteresis. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 96:169-191.
25. Lam C.N.C., Kim N., Hui D., Kwok D.Y., Hair M.L., Neumann A.W. The effect of liquid properties to contact angle hysteresis. Colloids Surf. A 2001, 189:265-278.
26. Dussan E.B. On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1979, 11:371-400.
27. Blake T.D., Ruschak K.J. A maximum speed of wetting. Nature 1979, 282:489-491.
28. Marmur A. Soft contact: measurement and interpretation of contact angles. Soft Matter 2006, 2:12-17.