A method for estimating security of electricity supply from intermittent sources: Scenarios for Germany until 2030 11The paper is based on a study of the Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWI) which assessed German electricity supply security in the short- and mid-term. We thank two anonymous re

Energy Policy

Volumn 46, Issue , 2012, Pages 193-202

  Grave, Katharina ^a   Paulus, Moritz ^a   Lindenberger, Dietmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Integration of renewable energy sources; Power generation; Supply adequacy

Indexed keywords

BACKUP CAPACITY; CONVENTIONAL POWER PLANTS; ELECTRICITY IMPORTS; ELECTRICITY SECTOR; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY ECONOMICS; EUROPEAN MARKETS; GENERATION CAPACITY; GERMANY; INVESTMENT MODELS; MARKET ANALYSIS; POWER SECTOR; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; RENEWABLES; SHORT TERM; SUPPLY ADEQUACY; SUPPLY SECURITY;

ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; NATURAL RESOURCES; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; POWER GENERATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ECONOMICS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY RESOURCE; ESTIMATION METHOD; PLANNING METHOD; POWER PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; STOCHASTICITY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84861223486     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.050     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bartels, M., Cost efficient expansion of district heat networks in Germany, PhD Thesis, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, 2009.
2. Batlle C., Rodilla P. A critical assessment of the different approaches aimed to secure electricity generation supply. Energy Policy 2010, 38. 7269-7179.
3. BDEW: Im Bau oder in Planung befindliche Kraftwerke, 2010.
4. BfS, 2011. Elektrizitötsmengen der deutschen Kernkraftwerke. Available at http://www.bfs.de/.
5. BMWI, Monitoring-Bericht des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie nach § 51 EnWG zur Versorgungssicherheit im Bereich der leitungsgebundenen Versorgung mit Elektrizität, BMWI (German Federal Ministry of Economics), Berlin, 2011.
6. Boccard N. Economic properties of wind power: a European assessment. Energy Policy 2008, 38:3232-3244.
7. Bouillon H., Machate R.-D., Tetzlaff G. Leistungseffekt von Windkraftanlagen. Elektrizitätswirtschaft Heft 1989, 24:1752-1759. S.
8. Brückl O. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretische Bestimmung des Regel- und Reserveleistungsbedarfs in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft. München 2006.
9. Dany G., Haubrich H.-J., Luther M., Berger F., von Sengbusch K. Auswirkungen der zunehmenden Windenergieeinspeisung auf die Übertragungsnetzbetreiber. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen Heft 2003, 9:562-566. S.
10. Dena Planning of the grid integration of wind energy in German onshore and offshore up to the year 2020 (Dena grid study). German Energy Agency (Dena) 2008.
11. Dena Integration of Renewable Energie Sources into the German Power Supply System in the 2015-2020 period with Outlook to 2025 (Dena grid study II). German Energy Agency (Dena) 2010.
12. EIA International Energy Outlook 2010 2010, DOE/EIA, Washington D.C.
13. ENTSO-E, System Adequacy Forecast 2009-2030, ENTSO-E, 2009.
14. ENTSO-E, Statistical Yearbooks, ENTSO-E, 2004-2009.
15. EURELECTRIC, Statistics and prospects for the european electricity sector - 36th edn. EURPROG 2008. EURELECTRIC, 2008.
16. Consentec et al., 2011. Analyse und Bewertung der Versorgungssicherheit in der Elektrizitätsversorgung, Report for the German Federal Ministry of Economics, 2011.
17. Finon D., Pignon V. Electricity and long-term capacity adequacy: the quest for regulatory mechanism compatible with electricity market. Utilities Policy 2008, 16:143-158.
18. Giebel, G., Wind power has a capacity credit a catalogue of 50+ supporting studies. Risø National Laboratory, Report, 2005.
19. Grothe, O., Schnieders, J., Spatial dependence in wind and optimal wind power allocation: a copula based analysis. EWI Working Paper No. 11/05. 2011.
20. Hartkopf, Th., Hagenkort, B., (1998): Kapazitätseffekt der Windkraftanlagen in Hessen.
21. MacCormack J., Hollis A., Zareipour H., Rosehart W. The large-scale integration of wind generation: impacts on price, reliability and dispatchable conventional suppliers. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3837-3846.
22. Nicolosi M. Wind power integration and power system flexibility - an empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany under the new negative price regime. Energy Policy 2010, 38:7257-7268.
23. Nitsch J., Wentzel B. Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau Erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland - Leitszenario 2009 2009, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), German.
24. Paulus M., Borggrefe F. The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany. Applied Energy 2011, 88:432-441.
25. Paulus M., Trüby J. Coal lumps vs. electrons: how do Chinese bulk energy transport decisions affect the global steam coal market?. Energy Economics 2011, 33(6):1127-1137.
26. PROGNOS and EWI, Energy scenarios for the energy summit on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Economics (BMWi), 2007.
27. Roques F. Market design for generation adequacy: healing causes rather than symptoms. Utilities Policy 2008, 16:171-183.
28. VGB Analyse der Nichtverfügbarkeit von Wärmekraftwerken 1996-2005. Technical Report. VGB Powertech e.V 2006.
29. Weigt H. Germany's wind energy: the potential for fossil capacity replacement and cost saving. Applied Energy 2009, 86:1857-1863.