Interactions between soil habitat and geographic range location affect plant fitness

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Stanton Geddes, John ^a   Shaw, Ruth G ^a   Tiffin, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOGRAPHY; LEGUME; LOAM SOIL; NONHUMAN; PLANT FITNESS; PLANT PARAMETERS; PLANT SEED; SANDY SOIL; SOIL; SPECIES HABITAT; CHAMAECRISTA; ECOSYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY;

CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA;

CHAMAECRISTA; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; SOIL;

EID: 84861207243     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036015     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Griggs RF, (1914) Observations on the behavior of some species at the edges of their ranges. Bull Torrey Bot Club 41: 25-49.
2. Kavanagh K, Kellman M, (1986) Performance of Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr. at the centre and northern edge of its range: a comparison. J Biogeogr 13: 145-157.
3. Schoener TW, (1975) Presence and absence of habitat shift in some widespread lizard species. Ecol Monogr 45: 233-258.
4. Warren RJ, (2010) An experimental test of well-described vegetation patterns across slope aspects using woodland herb transplants and manipulated abiotic drivers. New Phytol 185: 1038-1049.
5. Werner EE, Hall DJ, (1977) Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58: 869-876.
6. Bazzaz FA, (1991) Habitat selection in plants. Am Nat 137: S116-S130.
7. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC, (1954) The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press.
8. Brown JH, (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of a species. Am Nat 124: 255-279.
9. Macnair M, (1987) Heavy metal tolerance in plants: A model evolutionary system. Trends Ecol Evol 2: 354-359.
10. Fine PVA, Miller ZJ, Mesones I, Irazuzta S, Appel HM, et al. (2006) The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87 (7 Suppl) pp. S150-S162.
11. Henne PD, Hu FS, Cleland DT, (2007) Lake-effect snow as the dominant control of mesic-forest distribution in Michigan, USA. J Ecol 95: 517-529.
12. Bissett A, Richardson AE, Baker G, Wakelin S, Thrall PH, (2010) Life history determines biogeographical patterns of soil bacterial communities over multiple spatial scales. Mol Ecol 19: 4315-4327.
13. Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD, (1970) Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25: 349-362.
14. Sambatti J, Rice KJ, (2006) Local adaptation, patterns of selection, and gene flow in the Californian serpentine sunflower (Helianthus exilis). Evolution 60: 696-710.
15. Eckhart VM, Singh I, Louthan AM, Keledjian AJ, Chu A, et al. (2010) Plant - soil water relations and species border of Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana (Onagraceae). Int J Plant Sci 171: 749-760.
16. Hereford J, (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am Nat 173: 579-588.
17. Leimu R, Fischer M, (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3: e4010.
18. Etterson JR, (2004) Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the Great Plains. Evolution 58: 1446-1458.
19. Bischoff A, Crémieux L, Smilauerova M, Lawson CS, Mortimer SR, et al. (2006) Detecting local adaptation in widespread grassland species - the importance of scale and local plant community. J Ecol 94: 1130-1142.
20. Turreson G, (1922) The genotypic response of the plant species to habitat. Hereditas 3.
21. Clausen J, Keck D, Hiesey W, (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effects of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 520.
22. Ehlers BK, Thompson J, (2004) Do co-occurring plant species adapt to one another? The response of Bromus erectus to the presence of different Thymus vulgaris chemotypes. Oecologia 141: 511-518.
23. Crémieux L, Bischoff A, Šmilauerová M, Lawson CS, Mortimer SR, et al. (2008) Potential contribution of natural enemies to patterns of local adaptation in plants. New Phytol 180: 524-533.
24. Macel M, Lawson CS, Mortimer SR, Šmilauerova M, Bischoff A, et al. (2007) Climate vs. soil factors in local adaptation of two common plant species. Ecology 88: 424-433.
25. Gaston KJ, (2003) The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford, UK Oxford University Press.
26. Sagarin RD, Gaines SD, (2002) The 'abundant centre' distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecol Lett 5: 137-147.
27. Antonovics J, (1976) The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63: 224-247.
28. Holt RD, Gomulkiewicz R, (1997) How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm. Am Nat 149: 563-572.
29. Lopez S, Rousset F, Shaw FH, Shaw RG, Ronce O, (2009) Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of genetic load after fragmentation. Conserv Biol 23: 1618-1627.
30. Geyer CJ, Wagenius S, Shaw RG, (2007) Aster models for life history analysis. Biometrika 94: 415-426.
31. Shaw RG, Geyer CJ, Wagenius S, Hangelbroek HH, Etterson JR, (2008) Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth. Am Nat 172: E35-47.
32. Foote LE, Jackobs JA, (1966) Soil factors and the occurrence of partridge pea (Cassia fasciculata Michx.) in Illinois. Ecology 47: 968-975.
33. Irwin HS, Barneby RC, (1982) The American Cassiinae. A synoptical revision of the Leguminosae tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassiinae in the New World. New York, NY New York Botanical Garden Press pp. 802-811.
34. Ownbey GB, Morley T, (1993) Vascular Plants of Minnesota: A Checklist and Atlas. Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press.
35. Stanton-Geddes J, Tiffin P, Shaw RG, Role of climate and competitors in limiting fitness across range edges of an annual plant. Ecology (in press).
36. Schluter D, Price TD, Rowe L, (1991) Conflicting selection pressures and life history trade-offs. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 246: 11-17.
37. Galloway LF, Fenster C, (2000) Population differentiation in an annual legume: local adaptation. Evolution 54: 1173-1181.
38. Geber MA, Eckhart VM, (2005) Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 59: 521-533.
39. Griffith TM, Watson MA, (2006) Is evolution necessary for range expansion? Manipulating reproductive timing of a weedy annual transplanted beyond its range. Am Nat 167: 153-164.
40. Marsico TD, Hellmann JJ, (2009) Dispersal limitation inferred from an experimental translocation of Lomatium (Apiaceae) species outside their geographic ranges. Oikos 118: 1783-1792.
41. Prince SD, Carter RN, (1985) The geographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola): III. Its performance in transplant sites beyond its distribution limit in Britain. J Ecol 73: 49-64.
42. Samis KE, Eckert CG, (2009) Ecological correlates of fitness across the northern geographic range limit of a Pacific Coast dune plant. Ecology 90: 3051-3061.
43. Darling E, Samis KE, Eckert CG, (2008) Increased seed dispersal potential towards geographic range limits in a Pacific coast dune plant. New Phytol 178: 424-435.
44. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2.10 ed. Vienna, Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
45. Venables WN, Ripley BD, (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York, NY: Springer.
46. Shaw RG, Geyer CJ, Wagenius S, Hangelbroek HH, Etterson JR, (2007) Supporting data analysis for "Unifying life history analysis for inference of fitness and population growth" Technical report 658. Sch. of Statistics, Univ. of Minnesota.
47. Wolf JB, Wade MJ, (2009) What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 1107-1115.
48. Roach D, Wulff R, (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 209-235.