Preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging, with confirmatory biopsy, improves surgical outcomes in women with breast cancer without increasing rates of mastectomy

Breast Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 214-218

  Grady, Ian ^a   Gorsuch Rafferty, Heidi ^b   Hadley, Pat ^c  

^a North Valley Breast Clinic   (United States)

^b Rockingham Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^c MD Imaging   (United States)

Author keywords

breast neoplasms diagnosis; breast neoplasms surgery; magnetic resonance imaging; mastectomy; neoplasm staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AXILLA; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MENOPAUSE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861202744     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01227.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-Year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-1241. (Pubitemid 35176242)
2. Fisher B, Jeong J-H, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N,. Twenty-Five-Year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 567-575.
3. Geller BM, Oppenheimer RG, Mickey RM, Worden JK,. Patient perceptions of breast biopsy procedures for screen-detected lesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1063-1069. (Pubitemid 38561526)
4. Omne-Ponten M, Holmberg L, Burns T, Adami HO, Bergstrom R,. Determinants of the psycho-social outcome after operation for breast cancer. Results of a prospective comparative interview study following mastectomy and breast conservation. Eur J Cancer 1992; 7: 1062-1067.
5. O'Sullivan MJ, Li T, Freedman G, Morrow M,. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3133-3140. (Pubitemid 47594283)
6. Schaefer FK, Eden I, Schaefer PJ, et al. Factors associated with one step surgery in case of non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64: 426-431. (Pubitemid 350123582)
7. Mullenix PS, Cuadrado DG, Steele SR, et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 643-646. (Pubitemid 38596888)
8. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG,. Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging. J Okla State Med Assoc 2006; 99: 505-515.
9. Wallace AM, Daniel BL, Jeffrey SS, et al. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 527-537. (Pubitemid 40432320)
10. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1149-1157. (Pubitemid 44185114)
11. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-1303. (Pubitemid 46513295)
12. Braun M, Polcher M, Schrading S, et al. Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 111: 179-187. (Pubitemid 352009236)
13. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3248-3258.
14. Blair S, McElroy M, Middleton MS, et al. The efficacy of breast MRI in predicting breast conservation therapy. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94: 220-225. (Pubitemid 44289986)
15. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O'Dell CA, Brekke CE,. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 389-397.
16. Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von Heyden D, Funke M, Liersch T,. The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1725-1731. (Pubitemid 39386618)
17. Morrow M,. Limiting breast surgery to the proper minimum. Breast 2005; 14: 523-526. (Pubitemid 41683575)
18. Morrow M, Freedman G,. A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 363-378, vi. (Pubitemid 46070170)
19. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, Harris EE, Schnall MD,. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 386-391. (Pubitemid 351171689)
20. American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th edn. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 19982008.
21. Erguvan-Dogan B, Whitman GJ, Kushwaha AC, Phelps MJ, Dempsey PJ,. BI-RADS-MRI: a primer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W152-160.
22. Agresti A, Coull BA,. Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportion. Amer Stat May 1998; 52: 119-126.