Data-domain correlation approach for joint hydrogeologic inversion of time-lapse hydrogeologic and geophysical data

Geophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Johnson, Timothy C ^a   Versteeg, Roelof J ^a   Huang, Hai ^a   Routh, Partha S ^b  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Seismic Technology Development ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROGEOLOGY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; PETROPHYSICS;

CONDUCTIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; GEOPHYSICAL MONITORING; GEOPHYSICAL PARAMETERS; GEOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES; HYDROGEOLOGIC PARAMETER; HYDROGEOLOGIC PROPERTIES; MONITORING APPLICATIONS; PETROPHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CORRELATION; DATA INVERSION; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GEOPHYSICS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDROGEOLOGY; MONITORING; PARAMETERIZATION;

EID: 84861192010     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3237087     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Archie, G.E., 1942, The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics: Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 146, 54-62.tae, TAIMAF, 0096-4778
2. Certes, C. de Marsily, G., 1991, Application of the pilot point method to the identification of aquifer transmissivities: Advances in Water Resources, 14, 284-300.awr, AWREDI, 0309-1708, 10.1016/0309-1708(91)90040-U
3. Day-Lewis, F.D. Singha, K. Binley, A.M., 2005, Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resisitivity tomograms: Resolution-dependent limitations: Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, B08206.jgr, JGREA2, 0148-0227, 10.1029/2004JB003569
4. Deutsch, C.V. Journel, A.G., 1992, GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user's guide: Oxford University Press, Inc.
5. Gallardo, L.A. Meju, M.A., 2003, Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2-D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data: Geophysical Research Letters, 30.gpr, GPRLAJ, 0094-8276, 10.1029/2003GL017370
6. 2007, Joint 2D cross-gradient imaging of magnetotelluric and seismic travel-time data for structural and lithological classification: Geophysical Journal International, 169, 1271-1272.gji, GJINEA, 0956-540X, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03366.x
7. Gunther, T. Rucker, C. Spitzer, K., 2006, Three-dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography: 2 - Inversion: Geophysical Journal International, 166, 506-517.gji, GJINEA, 0956-540X, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03011.x
8. Hanke, M. Hansen, P.C., 1994, Regularization methods for large-scale problems: Surveys on mathematics for industry, 3, 253-315.smi, SMINER, 0938-1953
9. Hansen, P.C. O'Leary, D.P., 1993, The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems: SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 14, 1487-1503.8sm, SJOCE3, 1064-8275, 10.1137/0914086
10. Harbaugh, A.W. McDonald, M.G., 1996, User's documentation for MODFLOW-96, An update to the U. S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-485.
11. Huebner, K.H. Thornton, E.A. Byrom, T.G., 1995, Elements and interpolation functions: The finite element method for engineers: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 145-146.
12. Hyndman, D.W. Harris, J.M., 1996, Traveltime inversion for the geometry of aquifer lithologies: Geophysics, 61, 1728-1737.gpy, GPYSA7, 0016-8033, 10.1190/1.1444090
13. Kemna, A. Vanderborght, J. Kulessa, B. Vereeken, H., 2002, Imaging and characterization of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models: Journal of Hydrology, 267, 125-146.9rl, JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00145-2
14. LaBrecque, D.J. Yang, X., 2002, Difference inversion of ERT data: A fast inversion method for 3-D in situ monitoring: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 5, 83-89.c8e, ZZZZZZ, 1083-1363
15. Miller, C.R. Routh, P.S. Brosten, T.R. McNamara, J.P., 2008, Application of time-lapse ERT imaging to watershed characterization: Geophysics, 73, no. 3, G7-G17.gpy, GPYSA7, 0016-8033, 10.1190/1.2907156
16. Moysey, S. Singha, K. Knight, R., 2005, A framework for inferring field-scale rock physics relationships through numerical simulation: Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L08304.grj, 10.1029/2004GL022152
17. Oldenborger, G.A. Knoll, M.D. Routh, P.S. LaBrecque, D.J., 2007, Time-lapse ERT monitoring of an injection/withdrawal experiment in a shallow unconfined aquifer: Geophysics, 72, no. 4, F177-F187.gpy, GPYSA7, 0016-8033, 10.1190/1.2734365
18. Rucker, C. Gunther, T. Spitzer, K., 2006. Three-dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography: 1 - Modeling: Geophysical Journal International, 166, 495-505.gji, GJINEA, 0956-540X, 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03010.x
19. Singha, K. Gorelick, S.M., 2006a, Effects of spatially variable resolution of field-scale estimates of tracer concentration from electrical inversions using Archie's law: Geophysics, 71, no. 3, G83-G91.gpy, GPYSA7, 0016-8033, 10.1190/1.2194900
20. 2006b, Hydrogeophysical tracking of three-dimensional tracer migration: The concept and application of apparent petrophysical relations: Water Resources Research, 42, W06422.wre, WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/2005WR004568
21. Slater, L. Zaidman, M.D. Binley, A.M. West, L.J., 1997, Electrical imaging of saline tracer migration for the investigation of unsaturated zone transport mechanisms: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 1, 291-302.b8u, ZZZZZZ, 1027-5606
22. Tripp, A.C. Hohmann, G.W. Swift, C.M., 1984, Two-dimensional resistivity inversion: Geophysics, 49, 1708-1717.gpy, GPYSA7, 0016-8033, 10.1190/1.1441578
23. Zheng, C. Wang, P.P., 1999, MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; Documentation and user's guide: U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Contract Report SERDP-99-1.