Establishing composite SLAs through concurrent QoS negotiation with surplus redistribution

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 938-955

  Richter, J ^a   Baruwal Chhetri, M ^a   Kowalczyk, R ^a   Bao Vo, Q ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

composite SLA negotiation; coordination; quality of service; surplus redistribution; utility decomposition

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; ITERATIVE METHODS;

COMPLEX WORKFLOWS; COMPOSITE SERVICES; CONCURRENT SERVICE; COORDINATION; NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES; NEGOTIATION STRATEGY; SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS; SURPLUS REDISTRIBUTION;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84861191917     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1727     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bichler M, Lin KJ,. Service-oriented computing. Computer 2006; 39 (3): 99-101.
2. Benatallah B, Dumas M, Maamar Z,. Definition and execution of composite web services: The SELF-SERV project. Data Engineering Bulletin 2002; 25 (4): 1-6.
3. Grassi V, Patella S,. Reliability prediction for service-oriented computing environments. IEEE Internet Computing 2006; 10 (3): 43-49. (Pubitemid 43778900)
4. Khalaf R, Leymann F,. On web services aggregation. TES (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2819), Benatallah B, Chan MC, (eds.). Springer: Berlin, 2003; 1-13.
5. Papazoglou MP, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F, Kramer B,. Service oriented computing: A research roadmap. Service Oriented Computing, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Cubera F, Kramer B, Papazoglou M (eds.), Dagstuhl, 2006; 1-29.
6. Vecchiola C, Pandey S, Buyya R,. High-performance cloud computing: A view of scientific applications. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Pervasive Systems, Algorithms and Networks. IEEE CS Press: U.S.A., 2009.
7. Elfatatry A, Layzell P,. Negotiation in service-oriented environments. Communications of the ACM 2004; 47 (8): 103-108.
8. Baruwal Chhetri M, Lin J, Goh S, Yan J, Zhang J, Kowalczyk R,. A coordinated architecture for the agent-based service level agreement negotiation of web service composition. Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, 2006; 90-99. (Pubitemid 44592143)
9. Cardellini V, Cassalicchiio E, Grassi V, Presti F Lo,. Flow-based service selection for web service composition supporting multiple QoS classes. Proceedings of IEEE 2007 International Conference on Web Services. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, 2007; 743-750.
10. Comuzzi M, Pernici B,. A framework for QoS-based web service contracting. ACM Transactions on the Web 2009; 3 (3): 1-52.
11. Raiffa H,. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1982.
12. Jaeger MC, Rojec-Goldmann G, Mühl G,. Qos aggregation for web service composition using workflow patterns. EDOC '04: Proceedings of the Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, Eighth IEEE International. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, U.S.A., 2004; 149-159. (Pubitemid 40574679)
13. Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings NR,. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 1998; 24 (3-4): 159-182. (Pubitemid 128401747)
14. Li C, Sycara K, Giampapa J,. Dynamic outside options in alternating-offers negotiations. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, 2005; 35.2.
15. Brzostowski J, Kowalczyk R,. On fuzzy projection-based utility decomposition in compound multi-agent negotiations. Proceedings of the 12th International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress on Foundations of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; 757-766. (Pubitemid 350270030)
16. Pisinger D,. Algorithms for knapsack problems. PhD Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, 1995.
17. Huang AFM, Lan CW, Yang SJH,. An optimal QoS-based web service selection scheme. Information Science 2009; 179 (19): 3309-3322.
18. Yu T, Zhang Y, Lin KJ,. Efficient algorithms for web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints. ACM Transactions on the Web 2007; 1 (1): 6.
19. Alrifai M, Risse T, Dolog P, Nejdl W,. A scalable approach for QoS-based web service selection. Proceedings of ICSOC 2009. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009; 190-199.
20. Zeng L, Benatallah B, Dumas M, Kalagnanam J, Sheng QZ,. Quality driven web services composition. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM: New York, 2003; 411-421.
21. Ardagna D, Pernici B,. Adaptive service composition in flexible processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2007; 33 (6): 369-384. (Pubitemid 46772854)
22. Jaeger MC, Mühl G,. QoS-based selection of services: The implementation of a genetic algorithm. Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS 2007) Industriebetrge, Kurzbeitrge und Workshops, Braun T, Carle G, Stiller B, (eds.). VDE Verlag: Berlin-Offenbach, 2007; 350-359.
23. Canfora G, Penta MD, Esposito R, Villani ML,. An approach for QoS-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. ACM: New York, 1069-1075.
24. Gao Y, Zhang B, Na J, Yang L, Dai Y, Gong Q,. Optimal web services selection using dynamic programming. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, 2006; 365-370. (Pubitemid 47130242)
25. Blake MB, Cummings DJ,. Workflow composition of service level agreements. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos, 2007; 138-145. (Pubitemid 47565589)
26. Napoli C,. Software agent negotiation for service composition. Proceedings of the First KES International Symposium on Agent and Multi-agent Systems. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; 456-465. (Pubitemid 351283213)
27. Unger T, Leymann F, Mauchart S, Scheibler T,. Aggregation of service level agreements in the context of business processes. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, 2008; 43-52.
28. Haq I, Huqqani A, Schikuta A,. Aggregating hierarchical service level agreements in business value networks. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Business Process Management. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009; 176-192.
29. Nitto E, Penta M, Gambi A, Ripa G, Villani ML,. Negotiation of service level agreements: An architecture and a search-based approach. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Service-oriented Computing. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; 295-306.
30. Nguyen TD, Jennings NR,. Concurrent bi-lateral negotiation in agent systems. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. IEEE Computer Society: Washington, 2003; 844.
31. Shi B, Sim KM,. Coordination and concurrent negotiation for multiple web services procurement. Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Newswood Limited: Hong Kong, 2009; 950-955.
32. Brzostowski J, Baruwal Chhetri M, Kowalczyk R,. Three decision-making mechanisms to facilitate negotiation of service level agreements for web service compositions. Negotiation and Market Engineering, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, NickJennings N, Kersten G, Ockenfels A, Weinhardt C (eds.), Dagstuhl, 2007.