Changing of SYNTAX score performing fractional flow reserve in multivessel coronary artery disease

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 368-375

  Novara, Marco ^a   D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio ^a   Gonella, Anna ^a   Bollati, Mario ^a   Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe ^b   Moretti, Claudio ^a   Omedè, Pierluigi ^a   Sciuto, Filippo ^a   Sheiban, Imad ^a   Gaita, Fiorenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

coronary angiography; fractional flow reserve; functional SYNTAX score; SYNTAX score

Indexed keywords

PACLITAXEL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BARE METAL STENT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; DYSLIPIDEMIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SMOKING; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; STENT THROMBOSIS; SYNTAX SCORE; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861189613     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: 15582035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283536adc     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wijns W, Kohl P, Danchin N, et al. ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2501-2555.
2. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:961-972.
3. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. Eurointerv 2005; 1:219-227.
4. Ong AT, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, et al. The SYnergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in-phase. Am Heart J 2006; 151:1194-1204. (Pubitemid 44172867)
5. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, et al. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the SYNTAX study. Eurointerv 2009; 5:50-56.
6. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optical medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503-1516. (Pubitemid 46588415)
7. Pijls NH, Van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2105-2111. (Pubitemid 46771047)
8. Lima RS, Watson DD, Goode AR, et al. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:64-70. (Pubitemid 36760762)
9. Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, et al. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2008; 300:1765-1773.
10. Fisher JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90:210-215. (Pubitemid 34804552)
11. Garg S, Girasis C, Sarno G, et al. The SYNTAX score revisited: a reassessment of the SYNTAX score reproducibility. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75:946-952.
12. Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, et al. Fractional flow reserve. An useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92:3183-3193.
13. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1703-1708. (Pubitemid 26193622)
14. Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Siebert U, Pijls NH, FAME Study Investigators. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. Am Heart J 2007; 154:632-636. (Pubitemid 47429585)
15. Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96:877-884. (Pubitemid 41362506)
16. Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF, et al. One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:2623-2629. (Pubitemid 41746681)
17. Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy P, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:438-442. (Pubitemid 41040283)
18. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:213-224.
19. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. 2-year follow-up of the FAME study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:177-184.
20. Sant'Anna FM, Silva EE, Batista LA, Ventura FM, Barrozo CAM, Pijls NH. Influence of routine assessment of fractional flow reserve on decision making during coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:504-508. (Pubitemid 46215556)
21. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiography versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:2816-2821.
22. Nam CW, Mangiacapra F, Entjes R, et al. Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:1211-1218.
23. Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, et al. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenters LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus Erodable Stent coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:272-277.
24. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001; 104:157-162. (Pubitemid 32655831)
25. Jeremias A, Whitbourn RJ, Filardo SD, et al. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 2000; 140:651-657.
26. Thygessen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007; 116:26634-32653.
27. Bland J, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346:1085-1087.
28. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optical medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008; 117:1283-1291. (Pubitemid 351365675)
29. Wijns W, Kolh P. Appropriate myocardial revascularization: a joint viewpoint from an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon. Eur Heart J 2009; 30:2182-2185.
30. Park DW, Park SW, Park KH, et al. Frequency and risk factors for stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation during long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:352-356.
31. Ong AT, Serruys W, Aoki J, et al. The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1135-1141. (Pubitemid 40432449)
32. Malenka DJ, Leavitt BJ, Hearne MJ, et al. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circulation 2005; 112:1371-1376.
33. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2174-2183.
34. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Drug-eluting stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:331-341. (Pubitemid 351159232)