US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 497-502

  Maglinte, Gregory A ^a   Hays, Ron D ^a,b   Kaplan, Robert M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; Factor scoring coefficients; General population norms; Health related quality of life; Population survey; Sf 36

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; BODILY PAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL COMPONENT SUMMARY SCORE; MENTAL HEALTH; NATIONAL HEALTH MEASUREMENT STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PAIN; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSICAL COMPONENT SUMMARY SCORE; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SHORT FORM 36 VERSION 2; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTAL MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DEMOGRAPHY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; POSTAL SERVICE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861177244     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hays RD, Stewart AL. The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients. Psychol Assess 1990;2:22-30.
2. Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, Wells KB, Nelson EC, Kamberg CJ, et al. Summary and discussion of MOS measures. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992:345-71.
3. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey update. Spine 2000;25:3130-9.
4. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993.
5. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME. User's manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. 2nd ed. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2007.
6. Kazis LE, Lee A. Measurement comparisons of the Medical Outcomes Study and Veterans SF-36 Health Survey. Health Care Financ Rev 2004;25(4):43-58.
7. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1994.
8. Hays RD, Prince-Embury S, Chen H. R-36 HSI: RAND-36 Health Status Inventory. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1998.
9. Farivar SS, Cunningham WE, Hays RD. Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36v2 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.1. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:54.
10. U.S. Census Bureau. The 2009 Statistical Abstract: PDF version. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2009edition.html; Accessed May 26, 2009.
11. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obsesity in the United States, 1999-2004. J Am Med Assoc 2006;295:1549-55.
12. Weisfeldt ML, Zieman SJ. Advances in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Health Aff 2007;26(1):25-37.
13. Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, Hanmer J, Buechner J, Cherapanov D, et al. US norms for six generic health-related qual-ity-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement Study. Med Care 2007;45(12):1162-70.
14. SAS Institute Inc. SAS software version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2003.
15. Liu H, Cella D, Gershon R, Shen J, Morales LS, Riley W, et al. Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63(11):69-78.
16. Andersen RM, Davidson PL. Improving access to care in America: individual and contextual indicators. In: Andersen RM, Rice TH, Kominski GF, editors. Changing the U.S. healthcare system. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001:3-30.
17. Hanmer J, Hays RD, Fryback DG. Mode of administration is important in U.S. national estimates of health-related quality of life. Med Care 2007;45(12):1171-9.
18. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36v2 Health Survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 1994;32:551-67.
19. Hays RD, Kim S, Spritzer KL, Kaplan RM, Tally S, Feeny D, et al. Effects of mode and order of administration on generic health-related quality of life scores. Value Health 2009;12:1035-9.