A comparison between routine construction and post-disaster reconstruction with case studies from New Zealand

Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2006 - Procs 22nd Annual ARCOM Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 523-530

  Le Masurier, Jason ^a   Rotimi, James O B ^a   Wilkinson, Suzanne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Coordination; Legislation; Reconstruction; Regulation

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT; CONSTRUCTION PROCESS; COORDINATION; DEGREE OF COORDINATION; DISASTER MITIGATION; EMERGENCY SITUATION; NEW ZEALAND; RECONSTRUCTION PROCESS; RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; REGULATION; SMALL SCALE;

DISASTERS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 84861176026     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. AELG (2005). Resources Available for Response and Recovery of Lifeline Utilities, Technical Publication for Auckland Regional Council, New Zealand
2. Angus, L. (2004). The Direction for Recovery in New Zealand. In: NZ Recovery Symposium, Napier, New Zealand, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, New Zealand.
3. Angus, L. (2005). New Zealand's Response to the 1994 Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for a Safer World. In: World Conference of Disaster Reduction, Kobe-Hyogo, Japan
4. Coghlan, A. (2004). Recovery Management in Australia: A community-based approach. NZ Recovery Symposium, Napier, New Zealand, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, New Zealand.
5. Comerio, M. C. (2004). Public Policy for Reducing Earthquake Risks: a US perspective. Building Research and Information 32(5): 403-413.
6. Feast, J. (1995). Current Planning and Construction Law: The practical consequences for rebuilding Wellington after the quake. In: Wellington after the quake, EQC / CAE, New Zealand
7. Hopkins, D. C. (2004). Assessment of Resources Required for Reinstatement. NZ Recovery Symposium, Napier, New Zealand, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, New Zealand.
8. Jigyasu, R. (2004). Sustainable Post-Disaster Reconstruction Through Integrated Risk Management. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Post-disaster reconstruction, Coventry University, UK.
9. MCDEM (2004). Recovery Planning. Information for CDEM Groups. Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management, New Zealand.
10. MCDEM (2005a). Focus on Recovery: A holistic framework for recovery in New Zealand. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, New Zealand.
11. MCDEM (2005b). Recovery Management. Director's Guidelines for CDEM Groups. Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management, New Zealand.
12. Page, I. (2004). Reconstruction Capability of the New Zealand Construction Industry. NZ Recovery Symposium, Napier, New Zealand, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, New Zealand.
13. Rolfe, J and Britton, N (1995). Organisation, government and legislation: Who coordinates recovery? In: Wellington after the quake, EQC / CAE, New Zealand
14. Sullivan, M. (2003). Integrated Recovery Management: A new way of looking at a delicate process. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 18(2), 4-27.