The early inflammatory response in a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system: A prospective randomized study

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-32

  Kiaii, Bob ^a   Fox, Stephanie ^a   Swinamer, Stuart A ^a   Rayman, Reiza ^a   Higgins, Jennifer ^a   Cleland, Andrew ^a   Fernandes, Philip ^a   MacDonald, James ^a   Dobkowski, Wojciech B ^a   Stitt, Larry W ^a   Novick, Richard J ^a   Singh, Bhagirath ^a   Bureau, Yves ^a   Summers, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acute inflammatory response; CABG; CPB; Cytokines; Multiplexed technology

Indexed keywords

C REACTIVE PROTEIN; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR CXCR3; GAMMA INTERFERON; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; MONOCYTE CHEMOTACTIC PROTEIN 1; PLASMA PROTEIN; TROPONIN I; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD SAMPLING; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LEUKOCYTE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUTROPHIL; PERICARDIOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; THROMBOCYTE;

EID: 84861157678     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182552ade     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Wan S, Izzat MB, Lee TW, et al. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel CABG reduces cytokine response and myocardial injury. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:52-57.
2. Warren OJ, Smith AJ, Alexiou C, et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 1Vmechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardi-othorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:223-231.
3. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, et al. Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1198-1204. (Pubitemid 30259386)
4. Ben-Abraham R, Weinbroum AA, Dekel B, et al. Chemokines and the inflammatory response following cardiopulmonary bypassVa new target for therapeutic intervention?VA review. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13:655-661. (Pubitemid 37330445)
5. Miller BE, Levy JH. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:355-366. (Pubitemid 27214906)
6. Hill GE. Cardiopulmonary bypass-induced inflammation: is it important? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12:21-25. (Pubitemid 28185981)
7. Biglioli P, Cannata A, Alamanni F, et al. Biological effects of off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery surgery: focus on inflammation, hemostasis and oxidative stress. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:260-269. (Pubitemid 36952192)
8. Warren OJ, Smith AJ, Alexiou C, et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 1Vmechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardi-othorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:223-231.
9. Tsuchida M, Watanabe H, Watanabe T, et al. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on cytokine release and adhesion molecule expression in alveolar macrophages. Preliminary report in six cases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:932-938. (Pubitemid 27396438)
10. Butler J, Rocker GM, Westaby S. Inflammatory response to cardiopul-monary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55:552-559.
11. Westerberg M, Bengtsson A, Jeppsson A. Coronary surgery without cardiotomy suction and autotransfusion reduces the postoperative systemic inflammatory response. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:54-59. (Pubitemid 38833898)
12. Djaiani G, Fedorko L, Borger MA, et al. Continuous-flow cell saver reduces cognitive decline in elderly patients after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:1888-1895. (Pubitemid 350287084)
13. Ascione R, Caputo M, Angelini GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: not a flash in the pan. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:306-313. (Pubitemid 36099080)
14. Beghi C, Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, et al. Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system: results of a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1396-1400.
15. Czerny M, Baumer H, Kilo J, et al. Inflammatory response and myo-cardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17: 737-742. (Pubitemid 30364955)
16. Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, et al. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:845-857. (Pubitemid 14209268)
17. Wan IY, Arifi AA, Wan S, et al. Beating heart revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: evaluation of inflammatory response in a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127: 1624-1631. (Pubitemid 38725440)
18. Bical OM, Fromes Y, Gaillard D, et al. Comparison of the inflammatory response between miniaturized and standard CPB circuits in aortic valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:699-702.
19. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extra-corporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:527-533. (Pubitemid 35286933)
20. Formica F, Broccolo F, Martino A, et al. Myocardial revascularization with miniaturized extracorporeal circulation versus off pump: evaluation of systemic and myocardial inflammatory response in a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1206-1212.
21. Nollert G, Schwabenland I, Maktav D, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmo-nary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2326-2332. (Pubitemid 41718082)
22. Beghi C, Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, et al. Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system: results of a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1396-1400.
23. Benedtto U, Luciani R, Goracci M, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass and acute kidney injury in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:529-536.
24. Edmunds LH. Cardiopulmonary bypass after 50 years. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1603-1606. (Pubitemid 39350420)
25. von Segesser LK, Tozzi P, Mallbiabrrena I, et al. Miniaturization in car-diopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2003;18:219-224.