Overestimation of risk ratios by odds ratios in trials and cohort studies: Alternatives to logistic regression

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 184, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 895-899

  Knol, Mirjam J ^a   Le Cessie, Saskia ^b   Algra, Ale ^a,b   Vandenbroucke, Jan P ^b   Groenwold, Rolf H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS;

BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANNABIS SMOKING; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COHORT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MANTEL HAENSZEL TEST; MARRIAGE; METASTASIS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SHORT SURVEY; SIMULATION; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD SURGERY; STATISTICAL MODEL; WALKING;

EID: 84861157331     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.101715     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Greenland S, Thomas DC. On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 547-53.
2. Greenland S, Thomas DC, Morgenstern H. The rare-disease assumption revisited. A critique of "estimators of relative risk for case-control studies". Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:869-83.
3. Knol MJ, Vandenbroucke JP, Scott P, et al. What do case-control studies estimate? Survey of methods and assumptions in published case-control research. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:1073-81.
4. Miettinen O. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:226-35.
5. Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1. (Pubitemid 28532993)
6. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:21.
7. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, et al. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:940-3. (Pubitemid 36555054)
8. Robbins AS, Chao SY, Fonseca VP. What's the relative risk? A method to directly estimate risk ratios in cohort studies of common outcomes. Ann Epidemiol 2002;12:452-4.
9. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:702-6. (Pubitemid 38405384)
10. McNutt LA, Hafner JP, Xue X. Correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1999;282:529. (Pubitemid 29380288)
11. Hayatbakhsh MR, Najman JM, Jamrozik K, et al. Changes in maternal marital status are associated with young adults'cannabis use: evidence from a 21-year follow-up of a birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:673-9. (Pubitemid 43985559)
12. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 643-8. (Pubitemid 41176016)
13. Knol MJ, Duijnhoven RG, Grobbee DE, et al. Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e21248.
14. Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Introduction to stratified analysis. In: Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 258-82.
15. Mantel N. Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22: 719-48.
16. Royall RM. Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators. Int Stat Rev 1986;54:221-6.
17. Miettinen O. Design options in epidemiologic research. An update. Scand J Work Environ Health 1982;8(Suppl 1):7-14. (Pubitemid 12083633)
18. Schouten EG, Dekker JM, Kok FJ, et al. Risk ratio and rate ratio estimation in case-cohort designs: hypertension and cardiovascular mortality. Stat Med 1993;12:1733-45. (Pubitemid 23272638)
19. Austin PC. Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:2-6.
20. Austin PC, Laupacis A. A tutorial on methods to estimating clinically and policy-meaningful measures of treatment effects in prospective observational studies: a review. Int J Biostat 2011; 7: Article 6. DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679. 1285.
21. Groenwold RH, Moons KG, Peelen LM, et al. Reporting of treatment effects from randomized trials: a plea for multivariable risk ratios. Contemp Clin Trials 2011;32:399-402.
22. Lumley T, Kronmal R, Ma S. Relative risk regression in medical research: models, contrasts, estimators, and algorithms: UW biostatistics working paper series 2006. Seattle (WA): University of Washington; 2006. Working paper 293.
23. Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E. Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162: 199-200. (Pubitemid 41373523)