Systematic reviews in nutrition: Standardized methodology

British Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 107, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2012, Pages

  Wanden Berghe, Carmina ^a,b   Sanz Valero, Javier ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CEU CARDENAL HERRERA   (Spain)

^b University General Hospital   (Spain)

^c MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Methods; Omega 3 fatty acids; Research design; Review

Indexed keywords

OMEGA 3 FATTY ACID;

DATA ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DATA EXTRACTION; DATA PROCESSING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; PEER REVIEW; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FATTY ACIDS, OMEGA-3; HUMANS; METHODS; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84861147762     PISSN: 00071145     EISSN: 14752662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512001432     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Airy GB (1861) On the algebraic and numerical theory of errors of observations and the combination of observations [monograph on the Internet]. Cambridge: MacMillan and co. Available at: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/ illustrating/records/on-the-algebraical-and-numerical-theory-of-errorsof- observation/title-pages (accessed 15 February 2011).
2. Glass GV (1976) Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 10, 3-8.
3. Pearson K (1904) Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. BMJ 3, 1243-1246.
4. Glass GV, McGaw B & Smith ML (1981) Meta-analysis in social research [monograph on the Internet]. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Available at http://www.jameslindlibrary. org/illustrating/records/meta-analysis-in-social- research/title-pages (accessed 15 February 2011).
5. Stjernswärd J (1974) Decreased survival related to irradiation postoperatively in early operable breast cancer. Lancet 304, 1285-1286.
6. Stjernswärd J, Muenz LR & von Essen CF (1976) Postoperative radiotherapy and breast cancer. Lancet 307, 749.
7. Delgado Rodriguez M (2010) Revisión sistemá tica de estudios: Metaná lisis. Barcelona: Signo Editores.
8. Rothman KJ, Greenland S & Lash TL (2008) Modern Epidemiology, 3th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
9. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011) The Cochrane Policy Manual [homepage]. Oxford, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at http://www.cochrane.org/ policy-manual/welcome (accessed 15 February 2011).
10. The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2001) Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Changing Practice [serial on the Internet]. Available at http://www. joannabriggs.edu.au/pubs/best-practice. php (accessed 15 February 2011).
11. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic Reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care [monograph on the Internet]. York, UK: National Institute for Health Research, University of York. Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/index-guidance.htm (accessed 16 February 2011).
12. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) [Database on the Internet] (2011) Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? db¼mesh (accessed 16 February 2011).
13. Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS). [Database on the Internet] (2010) Sao Paulo: Virtual Health Library. Available at http://decs.bvs.br/I/homepagei.htm (accessed 16 February 2011).
14. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Module (2011) Handbook (Spanish version) [homepage]. Barcelona, Spain: Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano. Available at: http://www. cochrane.es/?q¼es/handbook (accessed 23 February 2011).
15. González de Dios J, Balaguer Santamar?́a A. (2007) Revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis (I): conceptos básicos. Evid Pediatr [serial on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.evidenciasenpediatria.es/DetalleArticulo/-LLP3k9qg zIh7aNQBiadwmV2uN pzhRtGoySyIrAFidII1cH-sSbFkbmyd 7FSp9aUz2s8mhuZE3MdxEj-U4cn17g#articulo- completo (accessed 23 February 2011).
16. Gérvas J & Pérez Fernández M (2001) La revisión por pares en las revistas cient?́ficas. Aten Primaria 27, 432-439.
17. American Medical Association (2011) JAMAevidence: Core topics in evidence-based medicine [homepage]. Available at http://jamaevidence.com/index (accessed 15 February 2011) Chicago, USA: American Medical Association & The McGraw-Hill Companies.
18. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2011) U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) [homepage]. Rockville, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, USPSTF. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix. htm (accessed 19 February 2011).
19. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) (2011) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) [homepage]. Edinburgh, UK: NHS QIS. Available at http://www. sign.ac.uk/index.html (accessed 22 February 2011).
20. Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) (2011) Tools for each step of the EBM process [homepage]. Oxford, UK: CEBM, University of Oxford. Available at http://www. cebm.net/index.aspx?o¼1023 (accessed 22 February 2011).
21. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). (2010) The CONSORT Statement [homepage]. The CONSORT Group. Available at http://www.consort- statement.org/consort-statement/(accessed 22 February 2011).
22. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17, 1-12. (Pubitemid 26120810)
23. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2010) Evidence Base [homepage]. Health Development Agency, NICE. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/whoweare/aboutthehda/evidencebase/ evidence-base.jsp (accessed 22 February 2011).
24. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) (2003) Guidelines for Authors of CADTH Health Technology Assessment Reports [monograph on the Internet]. Ottawa, Canada: CADTH. Available at http://www.cadth.ca/index. php/en/related-links/authors-guide (accessed 22 February 2011).
25. Moher D and The PRISMA Group. Liberati A & Tetzlaff J, et al. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [homepage] the PRISMA Statement. Available at: http://www.prisma-statement.org/ index. htm (accessed 21 August 2011).
26. Atienza Merino G, Maceira Rozas MC, Paz Valiñas L. (2008) Las revisiones sistemáticas, gu?́as cl?́nicas [monograph on the Internet]. A Coruña, Spain: Fisterra, atención primaria en la Red, Available at http://www.fisterra.com/guias2/fmc/rrss.asp (accessed 15 February 2011).
27. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. (2008), version 5·0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.
28. Systematic Reviews Collaborative Tool (SysCollab) [Computer program] Granada, Spain: University of Granada.
29. CASPe (2011) Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español (CASPe) [homepage]. Alicante, Spain: CASPe. Available at http://www.redcaspe.org/ (accessed 23 February 2011).