New application about cartel fighting in Turkey: Evaluation of the regret regulation

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 605-616

  Okyar, Mete Cuneyt ^a   Darici, Bulent ^a   Ocal, Fatih Mehmet ^a  

^a SIRNAK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cartel; Competition protection; Concentration indices; National competitiveness; Regret regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861147502     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Palombo L. Banka birlesmeleri ve satin almalari. T Bank Bir Ban Derg 1997;20:1-10 [in Turkish].
2. Simsek AT. Uluslararasi alanda ve Turkiye'de acik karteller ile mucadele, TC Basbakanlik Devlet Planlama Teskilati Mustesarligi Avrupa Birligi ile Iliskiler Genel Mudurlugu Yayinlari (Expertise Thesis), 2006; 2695, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/hukuk/ [in Turkish].
3. Official Gazette. Kartellerin ortaya çikarilmasi amaciyla aktif isbirligi yapilmasina dair yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik8.pdf [in Turkish].
4. Kaldirimci N. 2010 Rekabet mektubu, Competition Authority Yayini, 17.05.2010; http://www.sanayi.gov.tr/Files/Attachments/OtherFiles/rekabet-mektubu-17052010195637.pdf. [in Turkish].
5. Official Gazette. Rekabetin korunmasi hakkinda kanun. 13.12.1994; 4054; 22140;5;34; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/belgeler/belge7/kanun.pdf [in Turkish].
6. Ekelund R, Tollison B, Robert D. Microeconomics, Harper Collins Publishers, New York, 1990; 3;300.
7. Kadirimci N. 2010 Competition Letter, Competition Authority Public, 17.05.2010; http://www.sanayi.gov.tr/Files/Attachments/OtherFiles/rekabet-mektubu-17052010195637.pdf.
8. Arslan AS. Tek saticilik sozlesmelerinin rekabet kanunu çerçevesinde degerlendirilmesi ve muafiyete aykiri tek saticilik sozlesmelerine uygulanacak usul hukumleri, Gazi University Law Faculty J 2008; XII;1-2, 3-37 [in Turkish].
9. Deryal Y. Bazi ilaclarin donusumlu olarak (nobet usulu ile) eczanelerde satilabilecegine iliskin uygulamanin Turk rekabet hukuku acisindan degerlendirilmesi, Hasta Haklari ve Saglikli Yasam Dernegi (HAKSAY) Yayini, 2001; 1-8; http://www.haksay.org/files/yahya14.doc [in Turkish].
10. Gozlukaya F. Teknoloji transferi sozlesmelerine iliskin rekabet hukuku uygulamasi, Competition Authority Public (Expertise Thesis), 2006; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/ tezler/tez73.pdf-
11. DPT Dunyada kuresellesme ve bolgesel entegrasyonlar (EC, NAFTA, PASIFIC) ve Turkiye (EC, EFTA, BSEC, Turkic Republics, ECO, Islam Countries) iliskileri ozel ihtisas komisyonu Turkiye ve Avrupa Entegrasyonu alt komisyonu raporu, 1995; 2377; 441; http://www.dpt.gov.tr/DocObjects/Download/3339/oik441.pdf [in Turkish].
12. Ayranci H. Sozlesme kurma zorunlulugu. Ank Univ Huk Fac Derg 2003;52;229-252 [in Turkish].
13. Sanli KC. Rekabetin korunmasi hakkinda kanun'da ongorulen yasaklayici hukumler ve bu hukumlere aykiri sozlesme ve tesebbus birligi kararlarinin gecersizligi. Competition Authority Public, 1999; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/index.php?Sayfa=tezdetay&İd=87 [in Turkish].
14. Caglayan AI. Rekabet hukukunda pazar gucunun onemi ve olculmesi, Competition Authority Public (Expertise Thesis), 2003; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez26.pdf [in Turkish].
15. Caglayan AI. Rekabet hukukunda pazar gucunun onemi ve olculmesi, Competition Authority Public (Expertise Thesis), 2003; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez26.pdf [in Turkish].
16. Ozag, F. Yabanci sermayenin piyasa yapisina etkisi (Trans. Hans G. Ehrbar), Salt Lake City, USA. 2002; http://www.econ.utah.edu/~ehrbar/erc2002/pdf/P223.pdf [in Turkish].
17. Altay N, Oguzhan O A. Turk bankacilik sektorunde piyasa yapisi ve rekabet, Rekabet Duzenlemeler ve Politikalar Kongresi Tebligler Kitabi, 25-26 September 2003 Mugla University Competition Authority Public, 2003. http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/etkinlikkitap/etkinlik kitap13.pdf [in Turkish].
18. Yayla M. Turk bankacilik sektorunde yogunlasma ve rekabet: 1995-2005, Bank Duz Denet Kur Bank Finans Piyas Derg 2007;1;35-59 [in Turkish].
19. Yanik M. rekabet hukukunun hakim durum ve hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi uygulamalarinda piyasa giris engelleri, Competition Authority Public, 2003 [in Turkish]. http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez19.pdf.
20. Uyanik P. Pismanlik programlari (leniency programmes). Rek Derg 2002;10:32-51 [in Turkish].
21. Hayek FAV. The road to serfdom (Trans. Feyzioglu T. and Arsan Y.), Liberte Publishing 2004.
22. Uyanik P. Pismanlik programlari (leniency programmes), Rekabet Dergisi, 2002, 10; (April-June), 32-51 [in Turkish].
23. Whish R. Rekabet otoritelerinin faaliyetleri kapsaminda kartel uygulamalarina verilecek goreli agirlik, Rekabet Hukukunda Guncel Gelismeler Sempozyumu-VII Tebligler Kitabi, 17-18.04. 2009; Erciyes University and Competition Authority 2009; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/ etkinlikkitap/etkinlikkitap25.pdf [in Turkish].
24. Kocaer S. Kartellerle mucadelede pismanlik programlarinin uygulanmasi, Competition Authority Public. 2005; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez71.pdf [in Turkish].
25. Hammond S D. Detecting and deterring cartel activity through an effective leniency program, The U.S. Department of Justice Publications, Presented before the International Workshop on Cartels, 21-22 November 2000, Brighton, England. 2000. http://www.justice.gov/atr/ public/speeches/9928.pdf.
26. th Annual Symposium on Associations and Antitrust, 16 February 1999, The Carlton Hotel, Washington, D.C. 1999; http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/2247.pdf.
27. Spratling GR. The corporate leniency policy: answers to recurring questions, The US Department of Justice Publications, Presented at the ABA Antitrust Section 1998 Spring Meeting, 1 April 1998, Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington, D.C. 1998; http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/ speeches/1626.pdf.
28. OECD. Fighting hard core cartels: harm, effective sanctions and leniency programmes, OECD Reports, OECD Publications Service, Paris, France. 2002; http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/49/ 16/2474442.pdf.
29. Boner R, Kruger AR. The basics of antitrust policy: a review of ten nations and the European communities, The World Bank Technical Paper, 1991; 160; http://catalogue.nla.gov.au /Record/ 3023106.
30. Aubert C, Rey P, Kovacic W. The impact of leniency programs on cartels, International Industrial Organization Conference (IIOC) 2004 (Papers, Block II), 23-24 April 2004, Chicago, Illinois. 2003; http://www.ios.neu.edu/iioc2004/papers/f2a1.pdf.
31. Kobayashi BH. Antitrust, agency and amnesty: an economic analysis of the criminal enforcement of the antitrust laws against corporations, George Washington Law Review, Vol.69, Nos.5-6 (October-December), pp.715-744, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 02-04. 2001; http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=16451-E.T:24.08.2010.
32. Fox E, M. Pifotsky R. United States, Global Competition Policy Publications (Ed. Graham-Richardson), pp. 235-269, Washington D.C. 1997; https://www.competitionpolicy international.com/.
33. Arslan E. The possible contributions of development agencies on Turkish economy. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:285-292.
34. Hammond SD. A summary overview of the antitrust divisions criminal enforcement program, New York State Bar Association Annual Meeting, Presented at the New York Marriott Marquis,23 January 2003, New York. 2003; http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/200686.pdf[in Turkish].
35. Kocaer S. Kartellerle mucadelede pismanlik programlarinin uygulanmasi. Competition Authority Public, 2005; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez71.pdf [in Turkish].
36. Kocaer S. Kartellerle mucadelede pismanlik programlarinin uygulanmasi, Competition Authority Public, 2005; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez71.pdf [in Turkish].
37. Wils WPJ. The commission notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases: a legal and economic analysis. Europ Law Rev 1997;22;125-140.
38. Darici B, Ocal FM. The structure of European financial system and financial integration. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:133-145.
39. Alodali MFB. E-Multicipality application in Turkey and Sakarya metropolitan city. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:211-224.
40. Maguire C. The European Commission's new leniency notice: roses and thorns, Global Competition Review (April-May), 2002; 5; 2; 36-39. http://www.globalcompetitionreview. com/features/issues/issue/80/april-may-2002/.
41. Maguire C. The European Commission's new leniency notice: roses and thorns, Global Competition Review (April-May), 2002;5;2;36-39. http://www.globalcompetitionreview. com/features/issues/issue/80/april-may-2002/.
42. Kocaer S. Kartellerle mucadelede pismanlik programlarinin uygulanmasi, Competition Authority Public, 2005; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/tezler/tez71.pdf [in Turkish].
43. Kekevi H G. Pismanlik yonetmeligi: garp cephesinde yeni bir sey var. Rek Derg 2009;10;73-116 [in Turkish].
44. Official Gazette, Rekabeti sinirlayici anlasma, uyumlu eylem ve kararlar ile hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi halinde verilecek para cezalarina iliskin yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik9.pdf [in Turkish].
45. Official Gazette, Rekabeti sinirlayici anlasma, uyumlu eylem ve kararlar ile hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi halinde verilecek para cezalarina iliskin yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik9.pdf [in Turkish].
46. Official Gazette, Rekabeti sinirlayici anlasma, uyumlu eylem ve kararlar ile hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi halinde verilecek para cezalarina iliskin yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik9.pdf [in Turkish].
47. Official Gazette, Rekabeti sinirlayici anlasma, uyumlu eylem ve kararlar ile hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi halinde verilecek para cezalarina iliskin yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik9.pdf [in Turkish].
48. Official Gazette, TR Constitutional Court, Danistay besinci dairesi'nin itirazi hakkinda karar, 2009; 2007/31, 2009/109; 09.07.2009 [in Turkish].
49. Official Gazette, Rekabeti sinirlayici anlasma, uyumlu eylem ve kararlar ile hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi halinde verilecek para cezalarina iliskin yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik9.pdf [in Turkish].
50. Bilgi University, Rekabet hukuku yaptirim politikasinda yeni donem: ceza ve pismanlik yonetmelikleri, Konferans Tanitim Brosuru, 2009; http://www.bilgi.edu.tr/pages/common Downloads/RekabetHukukuKonferansi14Mayis.pdf [in Turkish].
51. Pamukkale University. Rekabet ekonomisi ve politikasi sempozyumu-iii, 8-9 Ekim 2010, 2010; http://rekabetekonomisi.pau.edu.tr [in Turkish].
52. Erciyes University. Rekabet Hukuku'nda Guncel Gelismeler Sempozyumu-VIII, 14-15 May 2010, 2010; http://hukuk.erciyes.edu.tr [in Turkish].
53. Competition Authority, 11. Yillik Faaliyet Raporu, Competition Authority Public, 2009; http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/faaliyetraporu/falrap23.pdf [in Turkish].
54. Official Gazette. Rekabeti sinirlayici anlasma, uyumlu eylem ve kararlar ile hakim durumun kotuye kullanilmasi halinde verilecek para cezalarina iliskin yonetmelik. 15.02.2009; 27142, http://www.rekabet.gov.tr/dosyalar/yonetmelik/yonetmelik9.pdf [in Turkish].
55. Demirbas A. Social, economic, environmental and policy aspects of biofuels. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:75-109.