Regulatory regimes in doctoral education

Changing Practices of Doctoral Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 225-236

  Tennant, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861131151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203870488-26     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Altbach, P. (2004) The United States: present realities and future trends, in J. Sadlak (ed.), Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects, Bucharest:UNESCO, pp. 259-278.
2. Arthur, E. (2002) The Commonwealth’s role in assuring quality in postgraduate research education, in M. Kiley and G. Mullins (eds), Quality in Postgraduate Research: Integrating Perspectives, Canberra: CELTS, pp. 32-40.
3. Bourner, T., Bowden, R. and Laing, S. (2001) Professional doctorates in England, Studies in Higher Education, 26(1): 65-83.
4. Brown, H. (2006) Graduate Enrolment and Degrees: 1986 to 2005, Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools, Office of Research and Information Services.
5. Chubb, I. (2006) The future of research education, in M. Kiley and G. Mullins (eds), Quality in Postgraduate Research: Knowledge Creation in Testing Times, Canberra: pp. 17-26.
6. Council of Australian Deans and Directors of Graduate Studies (2005) Framework for Best Practice in Doctoral Education in Australia, at: www.ddogs.edv.au/download/207271667.
7. Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (2000) Submission to DETYA on the proposed implementation of the Research Training Scheme, at: www.capa.edu.au.
8. Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame, London: Routledge.
9. Goldberger, M., Maher, B. and Flattau, P. (eds) (1995) Research-doctoral Programs in the United States:Continuity and Change, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Hufner, K. (2004) Germany, in J. Sadlak (ed.), Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects, Bucharest: UNESCO, pp. 51-62.
11. Kehm, B. (2004) Developing doctoral degrees and qualifications in Europe: good practice and issues of concern - a comparative analysis, in J. Sadlak (ed.), Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects, Bucharest: UNESCO, pp. 279-298.
12. Lemerle, J. (2004) France, in J. Sadlak (ed.), Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects, Bucharest: UNESCO, pp. 37-50.
13. McIntyre, J. and Symes, C. (eds) (2000) Working Knowledge: The New Vocationalism and Higher Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
14. McWilliam, E., Singh, P. and Taylor, P. (2002) Doctoral education, danger and risk management, Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2): 119-129.
15. McWilliam, E., Taylor, P., Lawson, A. and Evans, T. (2006) University risk management and higher degree research, abstract of symposium, in M. Kiley and G. Mullins (eds), Quality in Postgraduate Research: Knowledge Creation in Testing Times, Canberra ANU, p. 231.
16. Nerad, M. (2006) Globalization and its impact on research education: trends and emerging best practices for the doctorate of the future, in M. Kiley and G. Mullins (eds), Quality in Postgraduate Research: Knowledge Creation in Testing Times, Canberra: ANU, pp. 5-12.
17. Pearson, M. (1999) The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: implications for quality management, improvement and innovation, Higher Education Research and Development, 18(3): 269-288.
18. QAAHE (2007) Report on the Review of Research Degree Programmes: England and Northern Ireland, Mansfield: QAAHE.
19. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAAHE) (2004) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education, Section 1 - Postgraduate research programmes, UK, September, pp. 1-39.
20. Rhoades, G. and Sporn, B. (2002) Quality assurance in Europe and the US: professional and political economic framing of higher education policy, Higher Education, 43: 355-390.
21. Roffe, I. (1999) Innovation and creativity in organisations: a review of the implications for training and development, Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(4/5): 224-241.
22. Tennant, M. (2004) Doctoring the knowledge worker, Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2):432-441.
23. Usher, R. (2002) A diversity of doctorates: fitness for the knowledge economy?, Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2): 143-153.
24. Winter, R., Griffiths, M. and Green, K. (2000) The ‘academic’ qualities of practice: what are the criteria for a practice-based PhD?, Studies in Higher Education, 25(1): 25-37.