TEMPEST: An integrative model for health technology assessment

Health Policy and Technology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 35-49

  Currie, Wendy L ^a  

^a Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; PEER REVIEW; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POLITICAL SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84861123743     PISSN: 22118837     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Teisberg E.O., Porter M.E., Brown G.B. Making competition in healthcare work. Harvard Business Review 1994, 131-141.
2. Kaplan R.S., Porter M. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harvard Business Review 2011, 47-64.
3. Starr P. Health care reform and the new economy. Health Affairs 2000, 19(6):23-32.
4. Callaghan G.D., Wistow G. Publics, patients, citizens, consumers? Power and decision making in primary health care. Public Administration 2006, 84(3):583-601.
5. OECD. Health at a glance. Europe 2010. [online] ; 2010. http://www.oecd.org/document/19/0.
6. World Bank. ; 2009. http://data.worldbank.org/topic/health.
7. Goldsmith J. Technology and the boundaries of the hospital: three emerging technologies. Health Affairs 2004, 23(6):149-157.
8. Coye M.J., Kell J. How hospitals confront new technology. Health Affairs 2006, 25(1):163-173.
9. Reisman D. Health tourism 2010, Edward Elgar, UK.
10. Goldzweig C.L., Towfigh A., Maglione M., Shekelle P.G. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Affairs 2009, 282-293.
11. Wilkinson T.M. Medical reasoning and the failure of electronic medical record systems in the United States. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2010, 64(7):839-842.
12. Currie W.L. Integrating healthcare. Integrating healthcare with ICT 2009, 1-35. Radcliffe. W. Currie, D. Finnegan (Eds.).
13. European Commission. European economy. Joint report on health systems. Occasional papers, vol. 74. Report prepared by the European Commission and the Economic Policy Committee (AWG); December 2010.
14. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., MacFarlane F., Bate P., Kyriakidou O., Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science and Medicine 2005, 61:417-430.
15. de Lusignan S., Aarts J. UK's national programme for IT welcomes recommendation for a more sociotechnical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record. Information for Primary Care 2008, 16(2):75-77. [England].
16. Diamond C.C., Shirky C. Health information technology: a few years of magical thinking. Health Affairs 2008, W383-W390.
17. Draborg E., Gyrd-Hansen D., Poulsen P.B., Horder M. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2005, 21(1):89-95.
18. Hammond W.E., Bailey C., Boucher P., Spohr M., Whitaker P. Connecting information to improve health. Health Affairs 2010, 29(2):284-288.
19. Thomas RL. Learning the alphabet of healthcare IT. [online] ; 2006. http://findarticles.com.
20. Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., Donaldson M.S. To err is human: building a safer health system 1999, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
21. Carter J.H. Electronic health records 2008, ACP Press.
22. Health Reform Summit Committee. HRSC on finance. United States Senate (opportunities to increase efficiency in health care: statement by Peter R. Orszag). ; June 16 2008. http://www.cbo.gov.
23. DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., Rao S.R., Donelan K., Ferris T.G., Jha A., et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey. The New England Journal of Medicine 2008, 359(1):50-60.
24. DesRoches Catherine M, Campbell Eric G, Rao Sowmya R, Donelan Karen, Ferris Timothy G, Jha Ashish, Kaushal Rainu, Levy Douglas E, Rosenbaum Sara, Shields Alexandra E, Blumenthal David, . http://www.themedica.com/articles/2009/06/europe-medical-equipment-indus.html.
25. Economist Intelligence Unit. The future of healthcare in Europe; 2011.
26. Halamka J.D. Making smart investments in health information technology: core principles. Health Affairs 2009, (March):W385-W389.
27. Brennan S. The N.H.S. IT project 2005, Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
28. Wanless D. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. Final report of an independent review of the long-term resource requirement for the NHS. London. ; April, 1995. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk.
29. Moore M. Creating public value 2006, Harvard Business School Press, MA.
30. Bloomfield B.P. The role of information systems in the UK national health service: action at a distance and the fetish of calculation. Social Studies of Science 1991, 21:701-734.
31. Integrating healthcare with ICT 2009, Radcliffe, UK. W. Currie, D. Finnegan (Eds.).
32. DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., Vogeli C., Zheng J., Sowmya R., Rao S.R., et al. Electronic health records' limited success suggest more targetted uses. Health Affairs 2010, 29(4):639-646.
33. Esener. ; 2009. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/european/tables.htm.
34. Currie W.L., Guah M.W. A national program for IT in the organizational field of healthcare: a example of conflicting institutional logics. Journal of Information Technology 2007, (September):1-13.
35. Currie W.L., Guah M.W. IT-enabled healthcare delivery: the UK National Health Service. Information Systems Management 2006, (Spring):7-22.
36. Greenhalgh T., Wood G.W., Bratan T., Stramer K., Hinder S. Patients' attitudes to the summary care record and healthspace: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2008, (June):1-11.
37. National Audit Office. The national programme for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. HC 888. Session 2010-2012; 18 May 2011.
38. Svorronos T., Mate K.S. Evaluating large-scale health programmes at district level in resource-limited countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization (Policy and Practice) 2011, 89:831-837.
39. Currie W.L. The art of justifying new technology to top management 1989, Omega.
40. Gaunt N. Initial evaluation of patient interaction with electronic health record 2001, South and West Devon Community ERDIP.
41. Walker J.M., Carayon P. From tasks to processes: the case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Affairs 2009, 28(2):467-477.
42. Brown P.J.B., Warmington V. Data quality probes-exploiting and improving the quality of electronic patient record data and patient care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002, 68:91-98.
43. Gagnon M.-P., Scott R.E. Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: lessons from health technology assessment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2005, S2(Suppl. 2):34-36.
44. Heathfield H., Pitty D., Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in healthcare: barriers and challenges. British Medical Journal 1998, 316:1959-1961.
45. Rossi P., Lipsey M.W., Freeman H.E. Evaluation: a systematic approach 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 7th ed.
46. Currie W. Management strategy for information technology: an international approach 1995, Pitman, London, 310 p.
47. McNulty T., Ferlie E. Re-engineering healthcare: the complexities of organizational transformation 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
48. McNulty T., Ferlie E. Process transformation: limitations to radical organizational change within public service. Organization Studies 2004, 25(8):1389-1412.
49. Willcocks L., Currie W.L. Pursuing the re-engineering agenda in public administration. Public Administration 1997, 75(4):617-650.
50. Currie G., Suhomlinova O. The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: the triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Administration 2006, 84(1):1-30.
51. Boaden R., Harvey G., Moxham C., Proudlove N. Quality improvement: theory and practice in healthcare 2008, NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, UK.
52. Pfeffer J., Sutton R.I. Evidence based management. Public Management 2005, (September):14-25.
53. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecared: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 2005(July/August).
54. Doolin B. Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Information Systems Journal 2004, (14):343-362.
55. British Computer Society. The way forward for NHS health informatics. A report on behalf of the British computer society (BCS) by the BCS health informatics forum strategic panel; 15 December 2006.
56. Empirica. [online] ; 2008. http://www.empirica.com.
57. Eurostat. [online] ; 2011. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/health/introduction.
58. Euromonitor. [online] ; 2011. http://www.euromonitor.com/health-and-wellness.
59. Smith R.D., Chanda R., Tangcharoensathien V. Trade in health-related services. The Lancet 2009, 373:593-601.
60. Reisman D. Health tourism 2010, Edward Elgar, UK.
61. Berg M. The contextual nature of medical information. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999, 56:51-60.
62. Boonstra A., Boddy D., Ball S. Stakeholder management in IOS projects: analysis of an attempt to implement an electronic patient file. European Journal of Information Systems 2008, 17:100-111.
63. De Lusignan S. UK's national programme for IT welcomes recommendations for a more socio-technical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record. Informatics in Primary Care 2008, 16:75-77.
64. DeVore S.D., Figlioll K. Lessons premier hospitals learned about implementing electronic health records. Health Affairs 2010, 29(4):664-667.
65. European Commission. Europe's digital competitiveness report, vols. 1 and 2. SEC; 2009. 1104 p.