Differences between landline and mobile‐only respondents in a dual‐frame mental health literacy survey

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 192-193

  Holborn, Alicia T ^a   Reavley, Nicola J ^a   Jorm, Anthony F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PUBLIC HEALTH; TELEPHONE;

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84861122914     PISSN: 13260200     EISSN: 17536405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00857.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Newman, L., Telephone survey methods: implications of the increasing mobile-only population for public health research. Aust N Z J Public Health 35:5 (2011), 491–492.
2. Pennay DW. Profiling the ‘mobile phone only’ population. Results from a dual-frame telephone survey using a landline and mobile phone sampling frame. Proceedings of the Australian Consortium for Social and Political Research, Inc (ACSPRI) Social Science Methodology Conference; 2010 Dec 13; Sydney, Australia; 2010.
3. Reavley, N, Jorm, AF, Young people's recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment and outcome: Findings from an Australian national survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 45:10 (2011), 890–898.
4. Reavley, N, Jorm, AF, Recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment and outcome: findings from an Australian National Survey of Mental Health Literacy and Stigma. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 45:11 (2011), 947–956.
5. Kessler, RC, Andrews, G, Colpe, LJ, Hiripi, E, Mroczek, DK, Normand, LT, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32 (2002), 959–976.