Neural network mechanisms underlying stimulus driven variability reduction

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Deco, Gustavo ^a   Hugues, Etienne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); NEURAL NETWORK MODELS; SIGNAL ENCODING;

% REDUCTIONS; BRAIN AREAS; BRAIN STATE; FANO FACTOR; INFORMATION ENCODING; NETWORK MECHANISM; NEURAL ACTIVITY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; SINGLE CELL RECORDING; VARIABILITY REDUCTION;

NEURONS;

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BINDING COMPETITION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXCITATORY JUNCTION POTENTIAL; GABAERGIC SYSTEM; GABAERGIC TRANSMISSION; INHIBITION KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PHASE TRANSITION; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPIKE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84861121431     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002395     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Softky WR, Koch C, (1993) The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J Neurosci 13: 334-350.
2. Shadlen MN, Newsome WT, (1998) The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J Neurosci 18: 3870-3896.
3. Arieli A, Shoham D, Hildesheim R, Grinvald A, (1995) Coherent spatiotemporal patterns of ongoing activity revealed by real-time optical imaging coupled with single-unit recording in the cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 73: 2072-2093.
4. Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A, (1996) Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical responses. Science 273: 1868-1871.
5. Kenet T, Bibitchkov D, Tsodyks M, Grinvald A, Arieli A, (2003) Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes. Nature 425: 954-956.
6. Fiser J, Chiu C, Weliky M, (2004) Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision. Nature 431: 573-578.
7. Mitchell JF, Sundberg KA, Reynolds JH, (2007) Differential attention-dependent response modulation across cell classes in macaque visual area V4. Neuron 55: 131-141.
8. Mitchell JF, Sundberg KA, Reynolds JH, (2009) Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque visual area V4. Neuron 63: 879-888.
9. Cohen MR, Maunsell JH, (2009) Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nature Neurosci 12: 1594-1600.
10. Churchland MM, Yu BM, Cunningham JP, Sugrue LP, Cohen MR, et al. (2010) Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon. Nature Neurosc 13: 369-78.
11. Borg-Graham LL, Monier C, Fregnac Y, (1998) Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature 393: 369-373.
12. Rajan K, Abbott LF, Sompolinsky H, (2010) Stimulus-dependent suppression of chaos in recurrent neural networks. Phys Rev E 82: 011903.
13. Abbott LF, Rajan K, Sompolinksy H, (2011) Interactions Between Intrinsic and Stimulus-Dependent Activity in Recurrent Neural Networks. In: Ding M, Glanzman D, editors. The Dynamic Brain: An Exploration of Neuronal Variability and Its Functional Significance New York Oxford UP pp. 65-82.
14. Amit DJ, (1995) The Hebbian paradigm reintegrated: Local reverberations as internal representations. Behav Brain Sci 18: 617-626.
15. Amit D, Brunel N, (1997) Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 7: 237-252.
16. Brunel N, Wang XJ, (2001) Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical network model of object working memory dominated by recurrent inhibition. J Comput Neurosci 11: 63-85.
17. Rolls ET, Deco G, (2002) Computational Neuroscience of Vision Oxford Oxford University Press.
18. Rolls ET, Deco G, (2010) The Noisy Brain Oxford Oxford University Press.
19. Deco G, Jirsa VK, Robinson PA, Breakspear M, Friston K, (2008) The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000092.
20. Desimone R, Duncan J, (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann Rev Neurosci 18: 193-222.
21. Reynolds JH, Chelazzi L, Desimone R, (1999) Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J Neurosci 19: 1736-1753.
22. Holt G, Softky W, Douglas R, Koch C, (1996) A comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in vivo in cat visual cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol 75: 1806-1814.
23. Blumenfeld B, Bibitchkov D, Tsodyks M, (2006) Neural network model of the primary visual cortex: From functional architecture to lateral connectivity and back. J Comput Neurosci 20: 219-241.
24. Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, McCormick D, (2003) Turning on and off recurrent balance cortical activity. Nature 423: 288-293.
25. Haider B, Duque A, Hasenstaub A, McCormick D, (2006) Neocortical network activity in vivo is generated through a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition. J Neurosci 26: 4535-4545.
26. Rudolph M, Posposchil M, Timofeev I, Destexhe A, (2007) Inhibition determines membrane potential dynamics and controls action potential generation in awake and sleeping cat cortex. J Neurosci 27: 5280-5290.
27. Fox MD, Raichle ME, (2007) Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Rev Neurosci 8: 700-711.
28. Deco G, Jirsa V, McIntosh A, Sporns O, Koetter R, (2009) The key role of coupling, delay and noise in resting brain fluctuations. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 106: 10302-10307.
29. Abeles M, (1991) Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex New York Cambridge University Press.
30. Deco G, Rolls ET, (2005) Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neurons. J Neurophysiol 94: 295-313.
31. Hugues E, José JV, (2010) A unified and quantitative network model for spatial attention in area V4. J Physiol Paris 104: 84-90.