Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 180-186

  Florio, Pasquale ^a,b   Filippeschi, Marco ^b   Moncini, Irene ^a   Marra, Elena ^c   Franchini, Mario ^d   Gubbini, Giampietro ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b SAN GIUSEPPE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d Palagi Freestanding Unit   (Italy)

^e Madre Fortunata Toniolo Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

abnormal uterine bleeding; dysmenorrhea; endometrium; hysteroscopy; pelvic pain; scar dehiscence

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; DIVERTICULOSIS; DYSMENORRHEA; DYSPAREUNIA; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; HYSTEROGRAPHY; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; HYSTEROSCOPY; ISTHMOCELE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPHOCYTIC INFILTRATION; PATHOGENESIS; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPOTTING; SUTURING METHOD; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERUS BLEEDING; UTERUS DISEASE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

CESAREAN SECTION; CICATRIX; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSCOPY; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; UTERUS;

EID: 84861101151     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283521202     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the isthmocele in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:172-175.
2. Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? Int J Gynecol Pathol 1995;14:16-20.
3. Fabres C, Alam V, Balmaceda J, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of intrauterine lesions in infertile women. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5:375-378.
4. Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:13-16.
5. Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, et al. The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:695-700.
6. Van Horenbeeck A, Temmerman M, Dhont M. Cesarean scar dehiscence and irregular uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1137-1139.
7. Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernández C, et al. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:25-28.
8. Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, et al. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:370.e1-e4.
9. Borges LM, Scapinelli A, de Baptista Depes D, et al. Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with prior cesarean section. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:361-364. This article is important, as it fixes the role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in depicting the features of the isthmocele.
10. Lin YH, Hwang JL, Seow KM. Endometrial ablation as a treatment for postmenstrual bleeding due to cesarean scar defect. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;111:88-89.
11. Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, et al. Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: a prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18:234-237. This was the first prospective study exclusively focused on the usefulness of hysteroscopic surgery in treating secondary infertility due to isthmocele. It also hypothesized that the pathogenesis of the defect was related to the pathological samples of the endometrium in the isthmocele.
12. Florio P, Gubbini G, Marra E, et al. A retrospective case-control study comparing hysteroscopic resection versus hormonal modulation in treating menstrual disorders due to isthmocele. Gynecol Endocrinol 2011;27:434-438. This study compared surgical with medical therapy to improve symptoms (postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic pain localized in suprapubic site) in women with cesarean scar defect.
13. Uppal T, Lanzarone V, Mongelli M. Sonographically detected caesarean section scar defects and menstrual irregularity. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:413-416. The relevance of this study relies in the fact that it is demonstrated by transvaginal ultrasound that the larger the isthmocele, the higher is the incidence of abnormal vaginal bleeding.
14. Shih CL, Chang YY, Ho M, et al. Hysteroscopic transcervical resection. A straightforward method corrects bleeding related to cesarean section scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:278.e1-e2.
15. Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, et al. Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;154:218-222. This study is important because it evaluated the efficacy of resectoscopic surgery in treating uterine bleeding problems in women with isthmocele, and demonstrated that resectoscopic uterine remodeling is an appropriate therapy.
16. Heller DS. Pathologic basis for abnormal uterine bleeding with organic uterine pathologies. Menopause 2011;18:412-415.
17. Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, et al. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:791-800.
18. Rayburn WF, Schwartz WJ 3rd. Refinements in performing a cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996;51:445-451.
19. Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah A, et al. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD004662.
20. Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, et al. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;124:32-36.
21. Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, et al. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:429-434.
22. Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, et al. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:72-77.
23. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:85-89.
24. Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:75-83. The relevance of this study relies in the fact that it assessed the role of sonohysterography in diagnosing the isthmocele, as demarcations of scar defect were more clearly delineated.
25. Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, et al. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:289-292.
26. Poidevin L, Bockner V. A hysterographic study of uteri after cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1958;65:278-283.
27. Bockner V. Hysterography and ruptured uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1960;67:838-839.
28. Surapaneni K, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diverticulum: appearance on hysterosalpingography. R Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:870-874.
29. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section. Fertil Steril 2008;89:974-980.
30. Fernandez E, Fernandez C, Fabres C, et al. Hysteroscopic correction of cesarean section scars in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(4 Suppl):S13.
31. Kawakami S, Togashi K, Sagoh T, et al. Uterine deformity caused by surgery during pregnancy. Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:272-274.
32. Xu DB, He YQ, Liu H, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of women with previous cesarean scar defect. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2010;30:394-396.
33. Reis FM, Cobellis L, Luisi S, et al. Paracrine/autocrine control of female reproduction. Gynecol Endocrinol 2000;14:464-475.
34. Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Kayisli UA, Taylor HS. The role of growth factors and cytokines during implantation: endocrine and paracrine interactions. Semin Reprod Med 2009;27:62-79.
35. Klemm P, Koehler C, Mangler M, et al. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2005;33:324-331.
36. Yalcinkaya TM, Akar ME, Kammire LD, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of symptomatic cesarean scar defect: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med 2011;56:265-270. This was the first study on the usefulness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach in repairing cesarean scar defect.
37. Harper LM, Macones GA. Predicting success and reducing the risks when attempting vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008;63:538-545.
38. Adamyan LV. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;82:347-355.