Accuracy of primary systematic template guided transperineal biopsy of the prostate for locating prostate cancer: A comparison with radical prostatectomy specimens

Journal of Urology

Volumn 187, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2044-2050

  Huo, Andrew S Y ^a   Hossack, Tania ^c   Symons, James L P ^a   Pebenito, Ruth ^a   Delprado, Warick J ^b   Brenner, Phillip ^c   Stricker, Phillip D ^c  

^a GARVAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b DOUGLASS HANLY MOIR PATHOLOGY   (Australia)

^c ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

biopsy; organ size; prostate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SIZE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE SIZE; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC TEMPLATE GUIDED TRANSPERINEAL BIOPSY;

EID: 84861099176     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.066     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. K.K. Hodge, J.E. McNeal, M.K. Terris Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 1989 71
2. F. Rabbani, N. Stroumbakis, B.R. Kava Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies J Urol 159 1998 1247
3. L.A. Eskew, R.L. Bare, D.L. McCullough Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate J Urol 157 1997 199
4. J.C. Presti Jr, J.J. Chang, V. Bhargava The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial J Urol 163 2000 163
5. R.J. Babaian, A. Toi, K. Kamoi A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy J Urol 163 2000 152
6. G.S. Merrick, S. Gutman, H. Andreini Prostate cancer distribution in patients diagnosed by transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy Eur Urol 52 2007 715
7. J.E. McNeal, D.G. Bostwick Anatomy of the prostate: implication for disease D.G. Bostwick, Pathology of the Prostate 1990 Churchill-Livingstone New York 1 14
8. M.E. Chen, D.A. Johnston, K. Tang Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: biopsy strategy implications Cancer 89 2000 1800
9. B.K. Isariyawongse, L. Sun, L.L. Banez Significant discrepancies between diagnostic and pathologic Gleason sums in prostate cancer: the predictive role of age and prostate-specific antigen Urology 72 2008 882
10. A.P. Kirkham, M. Emberton, C. Allen How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? Eur Urol 50 2006 1163
11. O. Akin, E. Sala, C.S. Moskowitz Transition zone prostate cancers: feature, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging Radiology 239 2006 784
12. M.R. Engelbrecht, P. Puech, P. Colin Multimodality magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer J Endourol 24 2010 677
13. M. Mullerad, H. Hricak, L. Wang Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging Radiology 232 2004 140
14. H. Hricak MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pre-treatment evaluation of prostate cancer Br J Radiol 78 suppl. 2005 S103
15. J.J. Futterer, S.W. Heijmink, T.W. Scheenen Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging Radiology 241 2006 449
16. N. Girouin, F. Mège-Lechevallier, A. Tonina Senes Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable? Eur Radiol 17 2007 1498
17. P. Puech, E. Potiron, L. Lemaitre Dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 74 2009 1094
18. A. Villers, P. Puech, D. Mouton Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings J Urol 176 2006 2432
19. M.E. Chen, D. Johnston, A.O. Reyes A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume Am J Surg Pathol 27 2003 1291
20. R. Arora, M.O. Koch, J.N. Eble Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate Cancer 100 2004 2362
21. A.M. Wise, T.A. Stamey, J.E. McNeal Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 60 2002 264
22. S.E. Eggener, P.T. Scardino, P.R. Carroll Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities J Urol 178 2007 2260
23. G. Onik, M. Miessau, D.G. Bostwick Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4321
24. V. Ficarra, G. Novella, G. Novara The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy Eur Urol 48 2005 932
25. W.E. Barzell, M.R. Melamed Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate-a 4-year experience Urology 70 2007 27