Comparison of circumferential resection margin clearance criteria with survival after surgery for cancer of esophagus

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 105, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 745-749

  Rao, V S R ^a   Yeung, M M Y ^a   Cooke, J ^a   Salim, E ^a   Jain, P K ^a  

^a CASTLE HILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

circumferential resection margin; esophageal cancer

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURVIVAL; CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONCOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84861092350     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Edwards JM, Hillier VF, Lawson RAM, et al.: Squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus: Histological criteria and their prognostic significance. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 429-433. (Pubitemid 19100013)
2. Patti MG, Owen D:, Prognostic factors in esophageal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1997; 6: 515-531. (Pubitemid 27318302)
3. Robey-Cafferty SS, El-Naggar AK, Sahin AA, et al.: Prognostic factors in esophageal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1991; 95: 844-849.
4. Sagar PM, Johnston D, McMahon MJ, et al.: Significance of circumferential resection margin involvement after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1386-1388. (Pubitemid 23345093)
5. Dexter SPL, Sue-Ling H, McMahon MJ, et al.: Circumferential resection margin involvement: An independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Gut 2001; 48: 667-670. (Pubitemid 32378588)
6. The Royal College of Pathologists: Dataset for the histopathological reporting of oesophageal carcinoma, 2nd edition. The Royal College of Pathologists; 2007.
7. College of American Pathologists: Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus. College of American Pathologists (CAP); 2009.
8. Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM, et al.: Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 376-384.
9. Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, et al.: Prognostic faBTors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: The importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer 2002; 95: 1434-1443.
10. Mulligan ED, Dunne B, Griffin M, et al.: Margin involvement and outcome in oesophageal carcinoma: A 10-year experience in a specialist unit. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30: 313-317. (Pubitemid 38425651)
11. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, et al.: Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 327-334. (Pubitemid 34227032)
12. Griffiths Ewen A, Pritchard Susan A, Mapstone Nicholas P, et al.: Emerging aspects of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer histopathology-An update for the surgical oncologist. World J Surg Oncol 2006; 4: 82.
13. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, et al.: Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 449-457. (Pubitemid 34258342)
14. Sujendran V, Wheeler J, Baron R, et al.: Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circumferential margin positivity and its impact on prognosis in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 191-194.
15. Khan OA, Fitzgerald JJ, Soomro I, et al.: Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 1549-1552. (Pubitemid 36713780)
16. Skinner DB, Dowlatshahi KD, DeMeester TR:, Potentially curable cancer of the oesophagus. Cancer 1982; 50: 2571-2575.
17. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al.: Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986; 2: 1996-1999.
18. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, et al.: Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. Lancet 1994; 344: 707-711. (Pubitemid 24281421)
19. Zafirellis K, Dolan K, Fountoulakis A, et al.: Multivariate analysis of clinical, operative and pathologic features of esophageal cancer: Who needs adjuvant therapy? Dis Esophagus 2002; 15: 155-159. (Pubitemid 35264639)
20. Saha S, Dehn TC:, Ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Dis Esophagus 2001; 14: 32-36. (Pubitemid 32700508)
21. Roh MS, Lee JI, Choi PJ:, Significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Korean J Pathol 2004; 38: 23-28.
22. Griffiths EA, Brummell Z, Gorthi G, et al.: The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in oesophageal malignancy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32: 413-419.
23. Merchant NB, Guillem JG, Paty PB, et al.: T3N0 rectal cancer: Results following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3: 642-647.
24. Pultrum B, Honing J, Groen H, et al.: 2009; Gastrointestinal cancers symposium. Abstract no. 83.
25. Deeter M, Dorer R, Kuppusamy MK, et al.: Assessment of criteria and clinical significance of circumferential resection margins in esophageal cancer. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 618-624.