Coordination dynamics in CSCL based chat logs

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 772-774

  Weinel, Miriam ^a   Reimann, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COORDINATION BEHAVIOR; COORDINATION DYNAMICS; COORDINATION LEVELS; COORDINATION PATTERNS; COORDINATION PROCESS; INTER-INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84861086864     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599600.1599740     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small Groups as Complex Systems. Thousand Oaks, California, U.S.A.: Sage Publications, Inc.
2. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving Coordination in Collaborative Problem-Solving Groups. Journal of the LearningSciences, 9(4), 403-436.
3. Espinosa, A., Lerch, F. J. & Kraut, R. (2004). Explicit versus implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: one siz does not fit all. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: understanding thefactors that drive process and performance (pp. 107-129). Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.
4. Malone, T. W. & Crowston, K. (1990, 7-10 October). What is Coordination Theory and How can it Help DesignCooperative Work Systems? Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
5. Ullman, A., Peters, D. & Reimann, P. (2005, 9-11 November). Developing a research supportive web-basedlearning system. Paper presented at the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA), Adelaide, Australia.