Use of linear physical programming and Bayesian updating for design issues in reverse logistics

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1349-1359

  Pochampally, Kishore K ^a   Gupta, Surendra M ^b  

^a SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collection centres; end of use products; fuzzy logic; linear physical programming; remanufacturing; repairing

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN UPDATING; CLEAN AIR; DECISION MAKING MODELS; DESIGN ISSUES; END-OF-USE PRODUCTS; LINEAR PHYSICAL PROGRAMMING; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; REMANUFACTURING; REPAIRING; REVERSE LOGISTICS; REVERSE SUPPLY CHAINS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; FUZZY LOGIC; SUPPLY CHAINS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84861070412     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.571933     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Chan, FT, Chan, HK, and, Chan, MH. 2003. An integrated fuzzy decision support system for multi-criterion decision making problems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217 (1): 11-27.
2. Gungor, A, and, Gupta, SM. 1999. Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 36 (4): 811-853. (Pubitemid 30527322)
3. Hopgood, AA. 1993. Knowledge-based systems for engineers and scientists, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
4. Ilgin, MA, and, Gupta, SM. 2010. Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. Journal of Environmental Management, 91 (3): 563-591.
5. Knemeyer, AM, Ponzurick, GT, and, Logar, MC. 2002. A qualitative examination of factors affecting reverse logistics systems for end-of-life computers. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32 (6): 455-479.
6. Krajewski, LJ, Ritzman, LP, and, Malhotra, MK. 2010. Operations management: processes and supply chains, 9th, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
7. Messac, A, Gupta, SM, and, Akbulut, B. 1996. Linear physical programming: a new approach to multiple objective optimization. Transactions on Operational Research, 8 (2): 39-59.
8. Pochampally, KK, Nukala, S, and, Gupta, SM. 2009. Strategic planning models for reverse and closed-loop supply chains, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
9. Saaty, TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Saaty, TL. 1996. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
11. Tsaur, S, Chang, T, and, Yen, C. 2002. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, 23 (2): 107-115.
12. Wang, M, and, Liang, G. 1995. Benefit/cost analysis using fuzzy concept. The Engineering Economist, 40 (4): 359-376.
13. Zadeh, LA. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8 (3): 338-353.