The screling: Occurence of linguistic deficits in acute aphasia post-stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 429-435

  El Hachioui, Hanane ^a   Van De Sandt Koenderman, Mieke W M E ^a,b   Dippel, Diederik W J ^a   Koudstaal, Peter J ^a   Visch Brink, Evy G ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Rijndam Rehabilitation Center Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Cerebrovascular accident; Diagnosis; Language disorders; Phonetics; Screening test; Semantics

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APHASIA; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SEMANTICS; SPEECH DISORDER; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APHASIA; ARTICULATION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SEMANTICS; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861068259     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0955     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke 2010; 41: 1485-1488.
2. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, se-verity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17: 35-43. (Pubitemid 38145906)
3. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med 2001; 249: 413-422. (Pubitemid 34208945)
4. Lazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Variability in language recovery after frst-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg psychiatry 2008; 79: 530-534. (Pubitemid 351571870)
5. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 659-666.
6. Godefroy O, Dubois C, Debachy B, Leclerc M, kreisler A, Lille Stroke P. Vascular aphasias: main characteristics of patients hos-pitalized in acute stroke units. Stroke 2002; 33: 702-705. (Pubitemid 34203993)
7. Inatomi Y, Yonehara T, Omiya S, Hashimoto Y, Hirano T, Uchino M. Aphasia during the acute phase in ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 316-323. (Pubitemid 351555854)
8. Nys gM, Van Zandvoort MJ, De kort PL, Van Der Worp HB, Jansen BP, Algra A, et al. The prognostic value of domain-specifc cognitive abilities in acute frst-ever stroke. Neurology 2005; 64: 821-827. (Pubitemid 40316319)
9. Nys gM, van Zandvoort MJ, de kort pL, Jansen Bp, de haan Eh, kappelle LJ Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 408-416. (Pubitemid 46742330)
10. Flamand-Roze C, Falissard B, Roze E, Maintigneux L, Beziz J, Chacon A, et al. Validation of a new language screening tool for patients with acute stroke: the Language Screening Test (LAST). Stroke 2011; 42: 1224-1229.
11. Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT, Hewer RL. The Frenchay Apha-sia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 166-170.
12. Doesborgh SJ, van de Sandt-koenderman WM, Dippel DW, van Harskamp F, Koudstaal PJ, Visch-Brink EG. Linguistic defcits in the acute phase of stroke. J Neurol 2003; 250: 977-982. (Pubitemid 37041031)
13. Visch-Brink EG, van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, El Hachioui H. ScreeLing. Houten: Bohn Stafeu van Loghum; 2010.
14. Graetz P, De Bleser R, Willmes K. [Dutch edition of the Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT)]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1992 (in Dutch).
15. Goodglass h, kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1972.
16. De Renzi E, Faglioni P. Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex 1978; 14: 41-49. (Pubitemid 8327451)
17. Salter K, Jutai J, Foley N, Hellings C, Teasell R. Identifcation of aphasia post stroke: a review of screening assessment tools. Brain Inj 2006; 20: 559-568. (Pubitemid 43878688)
18. Nadeau SE. Phonology: a review and proposals from a connection-ist perspective. Brain Lang 2001; 79: 511-579. (Pubitemid 34093721)
19. Patterson K, Shewell C. Speak and spell: dissociations and word-class effects. In: Coltheart M, Sartori g, Job R, editors. The cog-nitive neuropsychology of language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates publishers; 1987, p. 273-294.
20. Basso A. Aphasia and its therapy. New York: Oxford University press Inc.; 2003.
21. Doesborgh SJC, van de Sandt-koenderman WME, Dippel DWJ, van Harskamp F, Koudstaal PJ, Visch-Brink EG. The impact of linguistic defcits on verbal communication. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 413-423. (Pubitemid 34476965)
22. Fucetola R, Connor LT, perry J, Leo p, Tucker FM, Corbetta M. Aphasia severity, semantics and depression predict func-tional communication in acquired aphasia. Aphasiology 2006; 20: 449-461.
23. El hachioui h, van de Sandt-koenderman MW, Dippel DW, koud-staal PJ, Visch-Brink EG. A 3-year evolution of linguistic disorders in aphasia after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 2011; 34: 215-221.
24. Butterworth B, Howard D, McLoughlin P. The semantic defcit in aphasia: the relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming. Neuropsychologia 1984; 22: 409-426. (Pubitemid 14095437)
25. Zhu Z, Zhang JX, Wang S, Xiao Z, huang J, Chen hC. Involvement of left inferior frontal gyrus in sentence-level semantic integration. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 756-763.
26. Howard D, Patterson KE. Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St. Edmonds: Thames Valley Co.; 1992.
27. Visch-Brink EG, Stronks DL, Denes G. [The Semantic Association Test]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 2005 (in Dutch).
28. Crutch SJ, Connell S, Warrington Ek. The different representa-tional frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: evidence from odd-one-out judgements. Q J Exp psychol (Col-chester) 2009; 62: 1377-1390.
29. pate DS, Saffran EM, Martin N. Specifying the nature of the pro-duction impairment in a conduction aphasic: a case study. Lang Cogn process 1987; 2: 43-84.
30. Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum As-sociates Ltd; 1992.
31. Bastiaanse R, Maas E, Rispens J. [The Verbs and Sentences test: WEZT]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 2000 (in Dutch).
32. Thompson Ck, Shapiro Lp, Ballard kJ, Jacobs BJ, Schneider SS, Tait ME. Training and generalized production of wh- and NP-movement structures in agrammatic aphasia. J Speech Lang hear Res 1997; 40: 228-244. (Pubitemid 27318752)
33. Chatterjee A, Maher L. grammar and agrammatism. In: Nadeau SE, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Crosson B, editors. Aphasia and language. New York: The Guilford Press; 2000, p. 133-159.