The identification of a sensitizing component used in the manufacturing of an ink ribbon

Journal of Immunotoxicology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 193-200

  Anderson, Stacey E ^a   Tapp, Loren ^a   Durgam, Srinivas ^a   Meade, B Jean ^a   Jackson, Laurel G ^a   Cohen, David E ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Ink ribbon manufacturing; Local lymph node assay; Occupational contact dermatitis; Polyvinyl butyral

Indexed keywords

BUTYRALDEHYDE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; INK; POLYVINYL BUTYRAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN BLOOD LEVEL; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPH NODE CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL ECZEMA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PRINTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RASH; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY;

ALLERGENS; ANIMALS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNIZATION; INDUSTRY; INK; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (U.S.); OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TESTS; UNITED STATES;

MURINAE;

EID: 84861049815     PISSN: 1547691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/1547691X.2011.654364     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Basketter, D. A., Lea, L. J., Dickens, A., Briggs, D., Pate, I., Dearman, R. J., and Kimber, I. 1999. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses. J Appl Toxicol. 19:261-266.
2. 2009. BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). U.S. Department of Labor, Career Guide to Industries, 2008-09 Edition, Printing. Available online at: Http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs050.htm, accessed 21 October 2009.
3. Burnett, C. A., Lushniak, B. D., McCarthy, W., and Kaufman, J. 1998. Occupational dermatitis causing days away from work in U.S. private industry, 1993. Am J Ind Med. 34:568-573.
4. Butler, J. E. 2000. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Immunoassay. 21:165-209.
5. Clark, S. C., and Zirwas, M. J. 2009. Management of occupational dermatitis. Dermatol Clin. 27:365-83, vii.
6. De Jong, W. H., De Klerk, A., Beek, M. T., Veenman, C., and Van Loveren, H. 2007. Effect of Prolonged Repeated Exposure to Formaldehyde Donors with Doses Below the EC3 Value on Draining Lymph Node Responses. J Immunotoxicol. 4:239-246.
7. Garabrant, D. H. 1985. Dermatitis from aziridine hardener in printing ink. Contact Derm. 12:209-212.
8. 2010. ICCVAM (Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods). ICCVAM Test Method Evulation Report on Using the Local Lymph Node Assay for Testing Pesticide Formulations, Metals, Substances in Aqueous Solutions, and Other Products. The results of an independent peer review evaluation coordinated by the ICCVAM and the NICEATM. NIH PublicationNo. 10-7512. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 2010. Available online at: Http://www.iccvam.niehs.nih.gov, accessed 13 June 2011.
9. Jolanki, R., Kanerva, L., Estlander, T., and Tarvainen, K. 1994. Concomitant sensitization to triglycidyl isocyanurate, diaminodiphenylmethane and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate from silk-screen printing coatings in the manufacture of circuit boards. Contact Derm. 30:12-15.
10. Keczkes, K. 1984. Does contact sensitivity last? Int J Dermatol. 23:108-109.
11. Klink, K. J., and Meade, B. J. 2003. Dermal exposure to 3-Amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-Triazole (AMT) induces sensitization and airway hyperreactivity in BALB/c mice. Toxicol Sci. 75:89-98.
12. Lee, E. E., and Maibach, H. I. 2001. Is contact allergy in man lifelong? An overview of patch test follow-ups. Contact Derm. 44:137-139.
13. Li, L. F., Sujan, S. A., and Wang, J. 2003. Detection of occupational allergic contact dermatitis by patch testing. Contact Derm. 49:189-193.
14. Livesley, E. J., Rushton, L., English, J. S., and Williams, H. C. 2002. The prevalence of occupational dermatitis in the UK printing industry. Occup Environ Med. 59:487-492.
15. Manetz, T. S., and Meade, B. J. 1999. Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T cell-mediated hypersensitivity responses. Toxicol Sci. 48:206-217.
16. Nethercott, J. R. 1988. Dermatitis in the printing industry. Dermatol Clin. 6:61-66.
17. Nethercott, J. R., and Nosal, R. 1986. Contact dermatitis in printing tradesmen. Contact Derm. 14:280-287.
18. Nethercott, J. R., Jakubovic, H. R., Pilger, C., and Smith, J. W. 1983. Allergic contact dermatitis due to urethane acrylate in ultraviolet cured inks. Br J Ind Med. 40:241-250.
19. NIEHS (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences). 1999. The murine local lymph node assay: A test method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals/compounds. Fed Regist. 64:14006-14007.
20. Nielsen, N. H., Linneberg, A., Menné, T., Madsen, F., Frølund, L., Dirksen, A., and Jørgensen, T. 2001. Persistence of contact allergy among Danish adults: An 8-year follow-up study. Contact Derm. 45:350-353.
21. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2011. Tapp, L. C., Durgam, S., and Mueller, C. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Evaluation of Contact Dermatitis Among Ink Ribbon Manufacturing Employees -New York. Health Hazard Evaluation Report HETA 2007-0261-3122. 2011.
22. Shapiro, M., Mowad, C., and James, W. D. 2001. Contact dermatitis due to printer's ink in a milk industry employee: Case report and review of the allergen paraphenylenediamine. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 12:109-112.
23. Woolhiser, M. R., Munson, A. E., and Meade, B. J. 1999. Role of sensitization routes in the development of Type I hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex in mice. Am J Ind Med. Suppl 1:139-141.
24. Woolhiser, M. R., Munson, A. E., and Meade, B. J. 2000. Comparison of mouse strains using the local lymph node assay. Toxicology. 146:221-227.