Restoration of grasp following paralysis through brain-controlled stimulation of muscles

Nature

Volumn 485, Issue 7398, 2012, Pages 368-371

  Ethier, C ^a   Oby, E R ^a   Bauman, M J ^b   Miller, L E ^a,c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC; BRAIN; INJURY; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDER; PRIMATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND FUNCTION; HAND MOVEMENT; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MEDIAN NERVE; MICROELECTRODE; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE EXCITATION; NERVE BLOCK; NEUROPROSTHESIS; NONHUMAN; PARALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRIPLEGIA; SPINAL CORD INJURY; ULNAR NERVE;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; MACACA MULATTA; MICROELECTRODES; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; MUSCLES; NERVE BLOCK; PARALYSIS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; QUADRIPLEGIA; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

MACACA MULATTA; PRIMATES;

EID: 84861045873     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature10987     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Keith, M. W. et al. Implantable functional neuromuscular stimulation in the tetraplegic hand. J. Hand Surg. Am. 14, 524-530 (1989).
2. Peckham, P. H. et al. Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: amulticenter study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 1380-1388 (2001).
3. Pohlmeyer, E. A., Jordon, L. R., Kim, P. & Miller, L. E. A fully implanted drug delivery systemfor peripheral nerve blocks in behaving animals. J. Neurosci. Methods 182, 165-172 (2009).
4. International. Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis. http://www.campaignforcure.org (2011).
5. Anderson, K. D. Targetingrecovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J. Neurotrauma 21, 1371-1383 (2004).
6. Popovic, M. R., Popovic, D. B.&Keller, T.Neuroprostheses for grasping. Neurol. Res. 24, 443-452 (2002).
7. Kilgore, K. L. et al.An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis. Follow-upof five patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 79, 533-541 (1997).
8. Evarts, E. V. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 14-27 (1968).
9. Humphrey, D. R., Schmidt, E. M. & Thompson, W. D. Predicting measures ofmotor performance from multiple cortical spike trains. Science 170, 758-761 (1970).
10. Carmena, J. M. et al. Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLoS Biol. 1, e42 (2003).
11. Gupta, R. & Ashe, J. Offline decoding of end-point forces using neural ensembles: application to a brain-machine interface. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 17, 254-262 (2009).
12. Fagg, A. H., Ojakangas, G. W., Miller, L. E. & Hatsopoulos, N. G. Kinetic trajectory decoding using motor cortical ensembles. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 17, 487-496 (2009).
13. Pohlmeyer, E. A., Solla, S. A., Perreault, E. J. & Miller, L. E. Prediction of upper limb muscle activity from motor cortical discharge during reaching. J. Neural Eng. 4, 369-379 (2007).
14. Cherian, A., Krucoff, M. O. & Miller, L. E. Motor cortical prediction of EMG: evidence that a kinetic brain-machine interface may be robust across altered movement dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 564-575 (2011).
15. Pohlmeyer, E. A. et al. Real-time control of the hand by intracortically controlled functional neuromuscular stimulation. IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Rehab. Robotics 454-458 (2007).
16. Pohlmeyer, E. A. et al. Toward the restoration of hand use to a paralyzed monkey: Brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation of forearmmuscles. PLoSONE 4, e5924 (2009).
17. Oby, E. R. et al. in Statistical Signal Processing for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (ed. O'Weiss, K.G.) 369-406 (Academic Press, 2010).
18. Moritz, C. T., Perlmutter, S. I. & Fetz, E. E. Direct control of paralysed muscles by cortical neurons. Nature 456, 639-642 (2008).
19. Adams, M. M. & Hicks, A. L. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 43, 577-586 (2005).
20. Kern, H. et al. Denervated muscles in humans: limitations and problems of currently used functional electrical stimulation training protocols. Artif. Organs 26, 216-218 (2002).
21. Waters, R. L., Adkins, R. H., Yakura, J. S. & Sie, I. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74, 242-247 (1993).
22. Bryden, A. M. et al. An implanted neuroprosthesis for high tetraplegia. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 10, 38-52 (2005).
23. Nightingale, E. J., Raymond, J., Middleton, J. W., Crosbie, J.&Davis, G. M. Benefits of FES gait in a spinal cord injured population. Spinal Cord 45, 646-657 (2007).
24. Agarwal, S. et al. Long-term user perceptions of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 40, 241-252 (2003).
25. Fitzwater, R.A personal user's view of functional electrical stimulation cycling. Artif. Organs 26, 284-286 (2002).