Multiple spreaders affect the indirect influence on Twitter

WWW'12 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web Companion

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 597-598

  Shuai, Xin ^a   Ding, Ying ^a   Busemeyer, Jerome ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex contagion; Social influence; Twitter

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX CONTAGION; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TWITTER;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SPREADERS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84861023006     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2187980.2188145     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. D. Centola and M. Macy. Complex contagion and the weakness of long ties. Technical report, 2005.
2. Y. Ding. Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5:187-203, 2011.
3. D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In WWW '11, pages 695-704, Hyderabad, India, 2011.
4. J. Tang, J. Sun, C. Wang, and Z. Yang. Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In KDD '09, pages 807-816, Paris, France, 2009.
5. R. Xiang, J. Neville, and M. Rogati. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In WWW '10, pages 981-990, Hong Kong, China, 2010.
6. V. I. Yukalov and D. Sornette. Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement. Theory and Decision, 70:283-328, 2011.