Impact of CO 2 emissions policy and system configuration on optimal operation of an integrated fossil-renewable energy park

Society of Petroleum Engineers - Carbon Management Technology Conference 2012

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 765-773

  Kang, C A ^a   Brandt, A R ^a   Durlofsky, L J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURES; ELECTRICITY PRICES; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION SYSTEM; EMISSION LEVEL; EMISSION PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATED ENERGY SYSTEMS; MASS BALANCE; NON-LINEAR RESPONSE; OPERATING ECONOMICS; OPERATING PROFIT; OPTIMAL OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES; POLICY SCHEMES; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS; RENEWABLES; SYSTEM COMPONENTS; SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS; TIME VARYING; WIND GENERATION;

CARBON; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; FOSSIL FUELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARKS; PROFITABILITY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84861013141     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Abramson, M., Audet, C., Couture, G., Dennis, J., and Le Digabel, S. The NOMAD Project. http://www.gerad.ca/nomad/. Accessed May 2011.
2. Al-Juaied, M. and Whitmore, A. 2009. Realistic costs of carbon capture. Discussion paper 2009-08. Energy Technology Innovation Research Group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/19185/realistic-costs-of-carbon- capture.html.
3. Black, J. 2010 (rev. 2). Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants: Volume 1: Bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. Report DOE/2010/1397, NETL, Pittsburgh, PA.
4. California State Legislature. 2006. SB1368: Emission Performance Standards. http://www.energy.ca.gov/emission-standards/.
5. 2 capture. Energy Procedia 1: 4289-4296. 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.
6. 2 capture. Energy Procedia 4: 2604-2611. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.
7. 2 capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations. Energy. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.031
8. 2 capture & storage and its implications for retrofitting the U.S. installed base. Energy & Environmental Science 2: 193-205.
9. 2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 45 (8): 2465-2472.
10. Jüdes, M., Vigerske, S., and Tsatsaronis, G. 2009. Optimization of the design and partial-load operation of power plants using mixed-integer nonlinear programming. In Optimization in the Energy Industry, ed. J. Kallrath, P. Pardalos, S. Rebennack and M. Scheldt. Chap. 9, 193-220. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. 2 capture and wind. Energy. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.015
12. Kim, T. Comparative analysis on the part load performance of combined cycle plants considering design performance and power control strategy. Energy 29 (1): 71-85.
13. Le Digabel, S. 2011. Algorithm 909: NOMAD: Nonlinear optimization with the MADS algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 37 (4): 44:1-44:15.
14. 2 abatement costs to base plant efficiency. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (3): 427-438.
15. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H., Loos, M., and Meyer, L., eds. 2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. North American Power Group Ltd. Projects: Two Elk Energy Park. http://www.napg-ltd.com/projects.html. Accessed October 2011.