Using acceptance tests to validate accessibility requirements in RIA

W4A 2012 - International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Watanabe, Willian Massami ^a   Fortes, Renata P M ^a   Dias, Ana Luiza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

acceptance testing; continuous integration; web accessibility

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE TESTING; ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; AUTOMATIC EVALUATION TOOL; INTEGRATION PROCESS; JAVASCRIPT; QUALITY REQUIREMENTS; RICH INTERNET APPLICATIONS; TEST SCENARIO; WEB ACCESSIBILITY; WEB APPLICATION; WEB PROJECTS;

JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; SOFTWARE TESTING; WEBSITES;

ACCEPTANCE TESTS;

EID: 84861011002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207016.2207022     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. IEEE standard for software verication and validation plans. Technical report, 1986.
2. B. C. Araújo, A. C. Rocha, A. Xavier, A. I. Muniz, and F. P. Garcia. Web-based tool for automatic acceptance test execution and scripting for programmers and customers. In Proceedings of the 2007 Euro American conference on Telematics and information systems, EATIS '07, pages 56:1-56:4, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
3. K. Beck. Test-driven development : by example. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2003.
4. Y. Borodin, J. P. Bigham, G. Dausch, and I. V. Ramakrishnan. More than meets the eye: a survey of screen-reader browsing strategies. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A '10, pages 13:1-13:10, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
5. G. Brajnik. Beyond conformance: The role of accessibility evaluation methods. In Web Information Systems Engineering - WISE 2008 Workshops, volume 5176 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 63-80. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2008.
6. G. Brajnik, Y. Yesilada, and S. Harper. Testability and validity of wcag 2.0: the expertise eect. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, volume 1 of ASSETS '10, pages 43-50, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
7. S. Bratt. Breaking barriers to a read/write web that empowers all. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A '10, pages 1:1-1:1, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
8. F. Cannizzo, R. Clutton, and R. Ramesh. Pushing the boundaries of testing and continuous integration. In Proceedings of the Agile 2008, pages 501-505, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society.
9. M. Cooper. Accessibility of emerging rich web technologies: web 2.0 and the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), W4A '07, pages 93-98, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
10. M. Fowler and M. Foemmel. Continuous integration, http://www. martinfowler.com/articles/-continuousIntegration.html, 2005.
11. A. P. Freire, R. P. M. Fortes, M. A. S. Turine, and D. M. B. Paiva. An evaluation of web accessibility metrics based on their attributes. In SIGDOC '08: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, pages 73-80, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
12. A. P. Freire, R. Goularte, and R. P. M. Fortes. Techniques for developing more accessible web applications: a survey towards a process classication. In SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, pages 162-169, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
13. A. P. Freire, C. M. Russo, and R. P. M. Fortes. A survey on the accessibility awareness of people involved in web development projects in brazil. In W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 87-96, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
14. J. Gehtland, D. Almaer, and B. Galbraith. Pragmatic Ajax: A Web 2.0 Primer. Pragmatic Bookshelf, 2006.
15. B. Gibson. Enabling an accessible web 2.0. In Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), W4A '07, pages 1-6, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
16. P. Hsia, J. Gao, J. Samuel, D. Kung, Y. Toyoshima, and C. Chen. Behavior-based acceptance testing of software systems: a formal scenario approach. In Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1994. COMPSAC 94. Proceedings., Eighteenth Annual International, pages 293 -298, nov 1994.
17. B. Kelly, D. Sloan, S. Brown, J. Seale, H. Petrie, P. Lauke, and S. Ball. Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 138-147, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
18. B. Kelly, D. Sloan, L. Phipps, H. Petrie, and F. Hamilton. Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity?: a framework for applying the wcag in the real world. In W4A '05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pages 46-54, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
19. H. K. N. Leung and P. W. L. Wong. A study of user acceptance tests. Software Quality Control, 6:137-149, October 1997.
20. F. Matheson. Designing for a moving target. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, volume 1 of NordiCHI '06, pages 495-496, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
21. M. Naftali, W. Watanabe, and D. Sloan. W4a 2010: a web accessibility conference report from the google w4a student award winners. SIGWEB Newsl., pages 1:1-1:5, September 2010.
22. J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack, editors. Usability inspection methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1994.
23. L. G. Reid and A. Snow-Weaver. Wcag 2.0: a web accessibility standard for the evolving web. In W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 109-115, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
24. P. Thiessen and S. Hockema. Wai-aria live regions: ebuddy im as a case example. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), W4A '10, pages 33:1-33:9, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
25. J. M. Umbach. Web 2.0 - the new commons. Feliciter. Canadian Library Association. HighBeam Research., January 2006.
26. C. A. Velasco, D. Denev, D. Stegemann, and Y. Mohamad. A web compliance engineering framework to support the development of accessible rich internet applications. In W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 45-49, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
27. M. Vigo, M. Arrue, G. Brajnik, R. Lomuscio, and J. Abascal. Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 99-107, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
28. W3C. Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation, May 1999.
29. W3C. Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.0. W3C Recommendation, December 2008.
30. W3C. Wai-aria 1.0 authoring practices - an author's guide to understanding and implementing accessible rich internet applications. W3C Working Draft, September 2010.
31. W3C. Accessible rich internet applications - (wai-aria) version 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation, January 2011.
32. T. Watanabe. Experimental evaluation of usability and accessibility of heading elements. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 157-164, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
33. W. M. Watanabe, D. F. Neto, T. J. Bittar, and R. P. M. Fortes. Wcag conformance approach based on model-driven development and webml. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC '10, pages 167-174, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.