Modelling the hydraulic impact of reintroducing large woody debris into watercourses

Journal of Flood Risk Management

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 164-174

  Thomas, H ^a   Nisbet, T ^a  

^a Forestry Commission Office   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alleviation; Dam; Flood; Modelling

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; DAM; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODPLAIN; FLOW VELOCITY; HYDRAULICS; REINTRODUCTION; RIVER SYSTEM; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; WATER QUALITY; WOODLAND; WOODY DEBRIS;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84861004377     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1753318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01137.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abbe T.B. & Montgomery D.R. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers Res Manage 1996, 12, 201-221.
2. Arcement G.J. & Schneider V.R. 1990) Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and floodplains. Water Supply Paper 2339, United States Geological Survey.
3. CEHW (1999). Flood Estimation Handbook (and accompanying WINFAP-FEH software and FEH CD-ROM digital data). Wallingford: Centre for Hydrology and Ecology.
4. Chow V.T. Open channel hydraulics. New York: Mc-Graw Hill, 1959.
5. Comiti F., Mao L., Preciso E., Picco L., Marchi L. & Borga M. Large wood and flash floods: evidence from the 2007 event in the Davča basin (Slovenia). In: D. De Wrachien, C.A. Brebbia & M.A. Lenzi, eds. Monitoring, Simulation, Prevention and Remediation of Dense and Debris Flows II. Southampton: WIT Press, 2008, pp. 173-182.
6. Fetherston K.L., Naiman R.J. & Bilby R.E. Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest. Geomorphology 1995, 13, 133-144.
7. Gregory K.J., Gurnell A.M. & Hill C.T. The permanence of debris dams related to river channel processes. Hydrol Sci 1985, 30, 371-381.
8. Grette G.B. The abundance and role of large organic debris in juvenile salmonid habitat in streams in second growth and unlogged forests. Seattle: University of Washington, 1985.
9. Gurnell A.M., Gregory K.J. & Petts G.E. The role of coarse woody debris in forest aquatic habitats: implications for management. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 1995, 5, 143-166.
10. Keller E.A. & Swanson F.J. Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surf Process 1979, 4, 361-380.
11. Lienkaemper G.W. & Swanson F.J. Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Can J For Res 1987, 17, 150-156.
12. Linstead C. & Gurnell A.M. 1998). Large woody debris in British headwater rivers: physical habitat and management guidelines. R&D Technical Report W185, School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham.
13. MacDonald A., Keller E.A. & Tally T. The role of large organic debris on stream channels draining redwood forests in north-western California. In: D.K. Harden, D.C. Marron & Se A. MacDonald, eds. Friends of the Pleistocene 1982 Pacific Cell field trip guidebook. Late Cenozoic History and Forest Geomorphology of Humbold County. San Francisco, CA: Woodward Clyde Consultants, 1982, 226-245.
14. Mazzorana B., Zischg A., Largiader A. & Hubl J. Hazard index maps for woody material recruitment and transport in alpine catchments. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2009, 9, (1), 197-209.
15. Murphy M.L. & Koski K.V. Input and depletion of woody debris in Alaska streams and implications for streamside management. N Am J Fish Manage 1989, 9, 427-436.
16. Steinblums I., Froelich H.A. & Lyons J.K. Designing stable buffer strips for stream protection. J For 1984, 82, 49-52.
17. Swanson F.J., Gregory S.V., Sedell J.R. & Campbell A.G. Land-water interactions: the riparian zone. Analysis of coniferous forest ecosystems in the western U.S. R. L. Edmonds. Stroudsberg, PA: Hutchinson Ross, 1982, 267-291.
18. Young W.J. Flume study of the hydraulic effects of large woody debris in lowland rivers. Regulated Rivers Res Manage 1991, 6, 203-211.