Critical appraisal of organ procurement under Maastricht 3 condition;Analyse critique du prélèvement en condition M3 de Maastricht

Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 454-461

  Puybasset, L ^a   Bazin, J E ^b   Beloucif, S ^c   Bizouarn, P ^d   Crozier, S ^a   Devalois, B ^e   Eon, B ^f   Fieux, F ^g   Gisquet, E ^h   Guibet Lafaye, C ⁱ   Kentish, N ^g   Lienhart, A ^j   Nicolas Robin, A ^a   Otero Lopez, M ^k   Pelluchon, C ^l   Roussin, F ^g   Beydon, L ^m  

^a PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^c AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d CHU de Nantes   (France)

^e CENTRE HOSPITALIER RENÉ DUBOS   (France)

^f HÔPITAL SAINTE MARGUERITE   (France)

^g SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

^h Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

ⁱ CNRS   (France)

^j HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

^k HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^l UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^m ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Tissue and organ procurement; Withholding treatment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN DEATH; BRAIN INJURY; FRANCE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGAN DONOR; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;

AIRWAY EXTUBATION; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ANOXIA; BRAIN DEATH; BRAIN INJURIES; COMA; FRANCE; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; REGISTRIES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; STROKE; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;

EID: 84860917854     PISSN: 07507658     EISSN: 17696623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kootstra G., Daemen J.H., Oomen A.P. Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc 1995, 27:2893-2894.
2. Reich D.J., Mulligan D.C., Abt P.L., Pruett T.L., Abecassis M.M., D'Alessandro A., et al. ASTS recommended practice guidelines for controlled donation after cardiac death organ procurement and transplantation. Am J Transplant 2009, 9:2004-2011.
3. Shemie S.D., Baker A.J., Knoll G., Wall W., Rocker G., Howes D., et al. National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada : donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. CMAJ 2006, 175:S1.
4. Organ donation after circulatory death. Report of a consensus meeting. British transplantation society and intensive care society. British Transplantation Society and Intensive Care Society 2010.
5. Devita M.A., Brooks M.M., Zawistowski C., Rudich S., Daly B., Chaitin E. Donors after cardiac death : validation of identification criteria (DVIC) study for predictors of rapid death. Am J Transplant 2008, 8:432-441.
6. Lewis J., Peltier J., Nelson H., Snyder W., Schneider K., Steinberger D., et al. Development of the university of Wisconsin donation after cardiac death evaluation tool. Prog Transplant 2003, 13:265-273.
7. Aubry R., Blanchet V., Viallard M.L. La sédation pour détresse chez l'adulte dans des situations spécifiques et complexes. Med Palliat 2010, 9:71-79.
8. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center policy and procedure manual. Management of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1993 ;3:A1-15.
9. Devita M.A., Snyder J.V. Development of the university of Pittsburgh medical center policy for the care of terminally ill patients who may become organ donors after death following the removal of life support. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1993, 3:131-143.
10. Wind T., Snoeijs M.G., Brugman C.A., Vervelde J., Zwaveling J., van Mook W.N., et al. Prediction of time of death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in potential donors after cardiac death. Crit Care Med 2012, 40(3):766-769.
11. Chan J.D., Treece P.D., Engelberg R.A., Crowley L., Rubenfeld G.D., Steinberg K.P., et al. Narcotic and benzodiazepine use after withdrawal of life support: association with time to death ?. Chest 2004, 126:286-293.
12. Wijdicks E.F., Hijdra A., Young G.B., Bassetti C.L., Wiebe S. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American academy of neurology. Neurology 2006, 67:203-210.
13. Albrecht G.L., Devlieger P.J. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:977-988.
14. Zahuranec D.B., Brown D.L., Lisabeth L.D., Gonzales N.R., Longwell P.J., Smith M.A., et al. Early care limitations independently predict mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2007, 68:1651-1657.
15. Topcuoglu M.A., Oguz K.K., Buyukserbetci G., Bulut E. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in post-resuscitation encephalopathy. Intern Med 2009, 48:1635-1645.
16. Luyt CE, Galanaud D, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Besancenot H, Perlbag V, Laureys S, et al. Pronostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in survivors of cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med 2011;Suppl 1 Abstract 0568.
17. Mayer S.A., Kossoff S.B. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology 1999, 52:1602-1609.